Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Fountain (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/fountain-37/)
-   -   42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/fountain/137567-42-ex-vs-42-lightning.html)

Back4More 08-10-2006 10:03 AM

42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
Why is the Lightning 5mph faster?
I would think that the Ex is lighter in weight and more aerodynamic.

Stormrider 08-10-2006 10:06 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
Different Bottoms?

Marginmn 08-10-2006 10:22 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
I think they have the same bottoms on the new models. Are you sure there is that much if any difference in speed?

Downtown42 08-10-2006 11:10 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
No diff in speed here. :rolleyes:

http://www.fountainpowerboats.com/boats/sport.htm

42 EXECUTIONER
Speed: 84+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives



42 LIGHTNING
Speed: 84+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives



42 POKER RUN
Speed: 95+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Staggered Mercury 525 hp w/ ITS Short Sportmasters



47 LIGHTNING
Speed: 88+ mph
Recommended Power:
Triple Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives

Marginmn 08-10-2006 11:33 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
Bingo - tks Downtown.

Rebel_Heart 08-10-2006 09:55 PM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
That's the exact speed I found when I took one out for a test ride - 84.

FeverMike 08-10-2006 10:00 PM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
I was reading some Cig threads and the Cig guys with new twin step top guns claim they run around 86-89 depending on the load and water with Merc 525's. I personally compare the 42 Ex and Lightning Fountain to a 38 Cig and they really do have about the same length of hull in the water.
What are your guys take on this?
thanks, Mike

Fanatic 08-10-2006 11:08 PM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 

Originally Posted by FeverMike
I was reading some Cig threads and the Cig guys with new twin step top guns claim they run around 86-89 depending on the load and water with Merc 525's. I personally compare the 42 Ex and Lightning Fountain to a 38 Cig and they really do have about the same length of hull in the water.
What are your guys take on this?
thanks, Mike

I have a friend who has a 2002/3 twin step gun with 575's and he says it runs 90.

I think the Top gun t/s hulls are dangerous though.

http://media.putfile.com/ejection

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...9&postcount=25

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...8&postcount=30

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...1&postcount=33

Fountains are safer and faster, period.

I don't think so. I hear the Cig guys and all the other Fountain haters saying that all the time, but look carefully at the pictures below. Notice the water line up to the point of the nose on each boat.

FeverMike 08-11-2006 07:35 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
That water line is at rest...running at speed is what counts. I am not dissing Fountain by any means...I own a Fountain and would own a 42 Fountain in a heartbeat. It is just surprising that a 38 TS/TG Cig is running mid to upper 80's with twin 525's. That is a huge heavy wet hull to be at those speeds. I thought they ran 80 on a good day. I guess Cig got there hull desgin together. Anyway, I know a guy in MD that has a 2002/3 38 Cig Gun with 575's and it ran 90 when he got it but I believe he added chillers, smaller pully and the computer was re-mapped and now he runs upper 90's. The Joker here on OSO has a 38 TS/TG Cig with 575's that would run 93mph. A new 42 Fountain with the new 600's will run 90-92mph.

Stormrider 08-11-2006 08:16 AM

Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning
 
FM, I believe waterline is measured at rest.
3yrs ago we were docked next to a 2003 TG TS w/ 525efi's and he claimed 86-87 tops.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.