Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning >

42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Notices

42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-10-2006 | 10:03 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 20
From: Lake Michigan
Default 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Why is the Lightning 5mph faster?
I would think that the Ex is lighter in weight and more aerodynamic.
Back4More is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
Stormrider's Avatar
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Different Bottoms?
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 10:22 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 393
From: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

I think they have the same bottoms on the new models. Are you sure there is that much if any difference in speed?
Marginmn is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 11:10 AM
  #4  
Downtown42's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,950
Likes: 0
From: 1 Flu Ovr KuKos Nest-WI
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

No diff in speed here.

http://www.fountainpowerboats.com/boats/sport.htm

42 EXECUTIONER
Speed: 84+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives



42 LIGHTNING
Speed: 84+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives



42 POKER RUN
Speed: 95+ mph
Recommended Power:
Twin Staggered Mercury 525 hp w/ ITS Short Sportmasters



47 LIGHTNING
Speed: 88+ mph
Recommended Power:
Triple Mercury 525 EFI w/ Bravo XR Drives
Downtown42 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 11:33 AM
  #5  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 393
From: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Bingo - tks Downtown.
Marginmn is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 09:55 PM
  #6  
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: LOTO
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

That's the exact speed I found when I took one out for a test ride - 84.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
FeverMike's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 9
From: Tampa
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

I was reading some Cig threads and the Cig guys with new twin step top guns claim they run around 86-89 depending on the load and water with Merc 525's. I personally compare the 42 Ex and Lightning Fountain to a 38 Cig and they really do have about the same length of hull in the water.
What are your guys take on this?
thanks, Mike
FeverMike is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2006 | 11:08 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 3
From: Chesapeake, Va.
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

Originally Posted by FeverMike
I was reading some Cig threads and the Cig guys with new twin step top guns claim they run around 86-89 depending on the load and water with Merc 525's. I personally compare the 42 Ex and Lightning Fountain to a 38 Cig and they really do have about the same length of hull in the water.
What are your guys take on this?
thanks, Mike
I have a friend who has a 2002/3 twin step gun with 575's and he says it runs 90.

I think the Top gun t/s hulls are dangerous though.

http://media.putfile.com/ejection

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...9&postcount=25

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...8&postcount=30

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...1&postcount=33

Fountains are safer and faster, period.

I don't think so. I hear the Cig guys and all the other Fountain haters saying that all the time, but look carefully at the pictures below. Notice the water line up to the point of the nose on each boat.

Last edited by Fanatic; 08-09-2007 at 11:51 PM.
Fanatic is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-2006 | 07:35 AM
  #9  
FeverMike's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 9
From: Tampa
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

That water line is at rest...running at speed is what counts. I am not dissing Fountain by any means...I own a Fountain and would own a 42 Fountain in a heartbeat. It is just surprising that a 38 TS/TG Cig is running mid to upper 80's with twin 525's. That is a huge heavy wet hull to be at those speeds. I thought they ran 80 on a good day. I guess Cig got there hull desgin together. Anyway, I know a guy in MD that has a 2002/3 38 Cig Gun with 575's and it ran 90 when he got it but I believe he added chillers, smaller pully and the computer was re-mapped and now he runs upper 90's. The Joker here on OSO has a 38 TS/TG Cig with 575's that would run 93mph. A new 42 Fountain with the new 600's will run 90-92mph.
FeverMike is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-2006 | 08:16 AM
  #10  
Stormrider's Avatar
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: 42 Ex vs. 42 Lightning

FM, I believe waterline is measured at rest.
3yrs ago we were docked next to a 2003 TG TS w/ 525efi's and he claimed 86-87 tops.
Stormrider is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.