Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Fountain (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/fountain-37/)
-   -   Fountain 42 Lightning (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/fountain/182737-fountain-42-lightning.html)

On Time 03-25-2008 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by runafever (Post 2498789)
Yes, staggard only. 42s are only offered in staggard.

Depends on the price. 496's are fine engines, and should last several hundred hrs. Most of us cruise at 50 mph or so, right? 496's should get you there without being at WOT.

runafever 03-25-2008 01:42 PM

I wouldnt be scared of a 496 ho boat with some CMIs if the price was right. Good fuel economy and boat will still run in the 60s without running it on the dash.

Perlmudder 03-25-2008 01:45 PM

im impressed that a 42 footer with 850 hp will do 75. what do other boats run with 496s (baja, formula, velocity, etc)?

runafever 03-25-2008 01:53 PM

Staggard motors, drive height, and a real efficient hull.The Numbers I have posted are pretty optimistic however. Add gas, coolers, bedding and whatever else and I think that 75 is still attainable with a blueprinted set of props. Still a good package I think.

gerritm 03-25-2008 02:32 PM


Originally Posted by Perlmudder (Post 2498951)
im impressed that a 42 footer with 850 hp will do 75. what do other boats run with 496s (baja, formula, velocity, etc)?

My old boat, a 2005 32' Sunsation Dominator ran around 80 mph with twin 496 mag ho's. Might squeeze a couple of more mph with labbed props.It weighed about 6500 # versus 11K for the 42'. Fountain has a very efficient hull and drive setup. I have 525's in my 42' Ex and would not recommend the 496's. Poor re-sale and I don't think you are going to gain that much in fuel economy. Unless you drive the boat in cruise mode at 40 to 50 and plan on keeping it for a long time. I think the extra stress on the motors to push the boat to get on plane will out weigh the small benefits in gas mileage.

later 03-25-2008 03:20 PM

friend has 05 42 ex 496 loto stock as a rock 72- 74mph, no real problem getting and staying on plane

pookie 03-25-2008 04:30 PM

One big advantage is engine life rather than gas milage. 496's as stated above will go several hundred hours before a rebuild or major work compared to 200-300 hours for even modestly bigger power.

gerritm 03-25-2008 06:27 PM


Originally Posted by pookie (Post 2499218)
One big advantage is engine life rather than gas milage. 496's as stated above will go several hundred hours before a rebuild or major work compared to 200-300 hours for even modestly bigger power.

Not if they are running at the top of their RPM band and straining to push that weight, I have no experience with the 496 set up in that large a boat, only giving my opinion after having them in a smaller, lighter boat. There is no substitue for weight, length, and HP. I would not be satisfied with that set up.

tomtbone1993 03-25-2008 06:32 PM

do you guys forget they put 454's and 465's in the old straight hull 42's?


They also put 496's in new 38 Cigs

The boat would be slower than a 525 boat, but would be a very reliable mid to low 70's boat

monstaaa 03-25-2008 08:29 PM

we have a guy in my marina that repowered with 496's. 18000 lb 40' searay. runs in the 40's and has around 800 hrs since we repowered it 3 1/2 years ago. now thats a load and strain.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.