looking for 32 fever
05-10-2011 | 10:45 AM
#24
Registered
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,311
Likes: 1,817
From: Merritt Island, FL
05-10-2011 | 11:37 AM
#25
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 417
Likes: 13
From: Birch Run, MI
I feel for you guys, I have been pricing 29's, but man, there are nice 32's going for the same price as a 29 with an HP500.
Making me rethink my strategy for sure. The only thing I am not sure of on the 32 is how low it sits in the water and the smaller cockpit, but the additional cabin space is nice.
Making me rethink my strategy for sure. The only thing I am not sure of on the 32 is how low it sits in the water and the smaller cockpit, but the additional cabin space is nice.
05-10-2011 | 11:43 AM
#26
Registered
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,311
Likes: 1,817
From: Merritt Island, FL
I feel for you guys, I have been pricing 29's, but man, there are nice 32's going for the same price as a 29 with an HP500.
Making me rethink my strategy for sure. The only thing I am not sure of on the 32 is how low it sits in the water and the smaller cockpit, but the additional cabin space is nice.
Making me rethink my strategy for sure. The only thing I am not sure of on the 32 is how low it sits in the water and the smaller cockpit, but the additional cabin space is nice.
As for how low, not as bad as a TWIN 29.
05-10-2011 | 01:41 PM
#27
Banned
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: New York
05-10-2011 | 08:35 PM
#29
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 417
Likes: 13
From: Birch Run, MI
I agree twin 29's just have too much weight crammed into too little room back there. I have read on this forum several times that the 32 and 27 have about the same size cockpit while the 29 and 35 have about the same size. I have not been in a 32 since I started looking seriously so I could be wrong.
