![]() |
ALL 32' FEVER owners PLEASE CHECK IN
What in your opinion are the pros and cons of this model?
So far we're concerned about the 108 gallon fuel tank on our 1997 model, that's not alot of seat time before fill ups. ( at cruise speed 35-45 mph how long are we looking at ? ) Maybe Reggie figured the boat already sat far too low in the arse that putting a proper 130+ gallon tank on for the twins may have sunk her L! TOP SPEED with 502 MAG MPI's - what are you seeing, what prop/pitch are you running? tab/trim set? Anyone who rebuilt their 502's what did you go with? or if you opted for a complete engine swap what benifits did you see? How many have water problems due to the low arse which looks kinda kool but has all those viewing running for help. Did you tear off your rubrails back to mid length and re-seal with 3M 5200 sealant? ( seems to be the norm ) Let's hear all the GOOD , the BAD, & the UGLY about this model in this thread from those that have enjoyed their 32 FEVER's for a few years if not more Cheers Spenc |
I did not realize the tank was that small, the 29's have a 140 gallon tank on the singles, do the twin models have that size tank? It seems it would sit even lower.
|
Someone on here posted they had a sales brochure of 1997 that quoted 119 gallon tank.
|
I talked to Tony Vick today at Fountain who went back through the specs and confirmed the 97 32' shows 108 gallon tank, they mentioned it was something alot of owners have complained about over the years. 108 gallon/119 gallon, that's VERY small for a twin.. you're not gone 1/2 an hour and looking for fuel
let's keep it to the questions guys.. pros/cons what do you like what do you not like etc etc |
Mine says 120 right on the tank sticker.
|
Originally Posted by rexcramer1
(Post 3405926)
I did not realize the tank was that small, the 29's have a 140 gallon tank on the singles, do the twin models have that size tank? It seems it would sit even lower.
|
Funny when I called fountain they told me 130 gal.:mad:
|
Originally Posted by rexcramer1
(Post 3405926)
I did not realize the tank was that small, the 29's have a 140 gallon tank on the singles, do the twin models have that size tank? It seems it would sit even lower.
|
Bad,,,,,,, no room to work in the engine bay, (I am 5' 10" 220lbs).
Bad,,,,,,, no good way to get up on the bow Good,,,,,Gets on plan quick, handles better then one would think. BTW Everyone worries about the vents in the back letting water in. If you take a look, it's not like those things feed right in, they are tubes that run UP and forward, and so that the real height is a lot higher then it looks. |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 3406301)
Bad,,,,,,, no room to work in the engine bay, (I am 5' 10" 220lbs).
Bad,,,,,,, no good way to get up on the bow Good,,,,,Gets on plan quick, handles better then one would think. BTW Everyone worries about the vents in the back letting water in. If you take a look, it's not like those things feed right in, they are tubes that run UP and forward, and so that the real height is a lot higher then it looks. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.