Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
99 47 Trip 800Scs >

99 47 Trip 800Scs

Notices

99 47 Trip 800Scs

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-05-2011, 04:58 PM
  #31  
VIP Member
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Quinlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tulsa, GLOC
Posts: 4,085
Received 591 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 47 lightning
the cheapest part of owning a 47 is the fuel .but would not have it any other way .had the 38s and 42s my fuel consumption at 60 mph is 90 gal per hr at 3500rpm 3x800 sc
Finally somebody WITH this setup.
It is a bad mo fo.
I was told by the previous owner 125 Mph I laughed out loud. kind of pizzed him off lol
maybe mid Teens?
Also what prop are you running? and is the middle L or R?
Quinlan is offline  
Old 10-05-2011, 05:00 PM
  #32  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri - 28mm
Posts: 2,253
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 47 lightning
the cheapest part of owning a 47 is the fuel .but would not have it any other way .had the 38s and 42s my fuel consumption at 60 mph is 90 gal per hr at 3500rpm 3x800 sc
My 2002 47 with triple 500 EFI's crushed the 1993 42 with triple 525SC's on fuel and it was faster.
eddie is offline  
Old 10-05-2011, 06:01 PM
  #33  
Registered
 
JasonSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,333
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eddie
My 2002 47 with triple 500 EFI's crushed the 1993 42 with triple 525SC's on fuel and it was faster.
Ed, how did the last 47' compare to fuel usage over the 33' Baja?
JasonSmith is offline  
Old 10-05-2011, 06:19 PM
  #34  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
tomtbone1993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAKE CONROE, TX
Posts: 15,491
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eddie
My 2002 47 with triple 500 EFI's crushed the 1993 42 with triple 525SC's on fuel and it was faster.
would it be safe to say step hull vs straight hull??
tomtbone1993 is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:41 AM
  #35  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lees Summit ~ LOTO 10MM
Posts: 2,981
Received 121 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonSmith
Ed, how did the last 47' compare to fuel usage over the 33' Baja?
endeavor1 is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:42 AM
  #36  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lees Summit ~ LOTO 10MM
Posts: 2,981
Received 121 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomtbone1993
would it be safe to say step hull vs straight hull??
Yes, 93 vs 2002
endeavor1 is offline  
Old 10-06-2011, 10:29 PM
  #37  
PF Marine
Platinum Member
 
Coolerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,787
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by JasonSmith
Ed, how did the last 47' compare to fuel usage over the 33' Baja?
Now there's an interesting question.... curious to here the response!
Coolerman is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 03:06 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
Yamaha 225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 424
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi guys.

This thread was interesting!! First of all, I can say that I am the one who made the video of the 2001 47/900 boat. I tested it for a potential customer, who changed his mind (for another reason than this particular boat) and did not buy a powerboat at all. Needless to say, the video footage we did could make people out there happy, so I made the video towards other clients. (one of my first home made videos, very amateur like but anyway...!) The price is of course not the same anymore.

The case is that for a boat enthusiast, this boat is so special, that you just can't be without it. I guess the same thing goes for owners of an original Dodge Charger with the high wing or a Mustang 500 etc. When you open the hatches, it is breathtaking. The rigging quality is (in my opinion) much better than the newer Fountains, all the shiny bits and that STELLING exhaust is fantastic. Three No 6 drives is also hard core. I just WANT THAT F****** boat!!!

That said, the consumption is not interesting, it is just to own and be happy to own a beast like this which is the "thing". I know the white 47 with 3x800s is out there at a cheap price. I would buy it. It has original Merc 800s. The sound and torque and rooster tail etc is just phenomenal. The consuption is also phenomenal, but what the heck, you are a MAN and you have 2400 horsepower and 3 large diametre propellers to push it! It is worth it.

I guess it all depends on what kind of boating you usually do. I myself use to turn my motors like 80-100 houres every season, so to me, a beast like this would be "a bit expencive to run", but for garage-boaters, this trip big power set up could be just fine. Many powerboaters run 25 houres a year! Or even less...

Remember that these boats are in reality no longer in production. And put a new 1100/1350 right next to a 900 SC..... It would look outright boring, even if it would be 100 times easier to live with. You will never buy a powerboat because you need it anyway, it is just a fun playtoy for you and your friends and family.

I would love to see someone buy either of these boats just to keep them original and in mint condition. The one I ran had a total cost of over 950.000 USD in 2001. Probably done in your "pre- 9/11" era! It doesn't matter which way you put it, THIS IS THE REAL **** of powerboats, and it is also A FOUNTAIN. No boats can compare when it comes to handling. It is like buying a mint condition Lamboghini Diablo. It just work like hell at over 200 mph. Few other cars of that era does.

Erik

Last edited by Yamaha 225; 10-07-2011 at 03:12 AM.
Yamaha 225 is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 06:43 AM
  #39  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri - 28mm
Posts: 2,253
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coolerman
Now there's an interesting question.... curious to here the response!
The 1993 was a straight bottom triple 525 SC's.

The 33 Outlaw was a 2001 with 496 HO MAG's.

The 2002 47 Fountain was triple 500 EFI's.

I'd have to go back and look at my gas tax refund paper work. If I had to say I think I burned around $3,500 a year on the 33 and we boated about 100 hours a year with it. The same 100 hours on the 47 cost me about $5,200. I'd have to go back and look at the total gallons. Insurance on the 47 was around $1,300 and it was $600 on the 33. Going down the main channel on a Saturday afternoon at 80+ is priceless. Fuel bill for the 1993 42 was over $8k running the boat from May - August - that was 93 octane too. Not sure on the hours as the boat didn't have hour meters, but it wasn't turned off much. The ride on the 42 was awesome too.
eddie is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:11 PM
  #40  
VIP Member
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Quinlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tulsa, GLOC
Posts: 4,085
Received 591 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

I think low 80s will by it. Probably even less.
Quinlan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.