Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
38 EC top speed with 525's? >

38 EC top speed with 525's?

Notices

38 EC top speed with 525's?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-31-2012 | 03:32 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by verbi69
Thanks,

I talked with the owner of the whippled 500 boat and he did confirm the boat ran 80.
Theres a 48 EC in Ontario that has triple 700's... not sure on top speed but its probably one of the fastest cruisers ever made!
breakitout is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-2012 | 03:13 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Linwood, Saginaw Bay
Default

Originally Posted by AB69Z
Im also looking at moving into at 38 EC. Any input from someone who has moved from offshore to one of these? anybody trailer theirs?
Went from a 93mph 35 Lightning to this, and never looked back. It is awesome in the big water, and you can stand up and pee.
We trailer it with a TopKick DuraMax and it pulls fine, but gets squirrelly over 65mph with the tanks full. Never a dull moment.
Again, any input on an Arneson conversion with the 496HO's?
Carder
Carder is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2012 | 07:03 AM
  #23  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Default

Originally Posted by Carder
Went from a 93mph 35 Lightning to this, and never looked back. It is awesome in the big water, and you can stand up and pee.
We trailer it with a TopKick DuraMax and it pulls fine, but gets squirrelly over 65mph with the tanks full. Never a dull moment.
Again, any input on an Arneson conversion with the 496HO's?
Carder
What kind of input are you looking for? You should contact Rik at Arneson. If you are currently running BIIIs you should see a significant increase in top speed and cruise efficiensy. Possibly 10 mph.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Reply
Old 02-07-2012 | 12:09 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Linwood, Saginaw Bay
Default

I'm curious if it has ever been done on a 38.
I have a bad history of being someone else's free guinea pig for unproven R and D...
... don't want to make that mistake again.
Carder is offline  
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 06:55 AM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carder
I'm curious if it has ever been done on a 38.
I have a bad history of being someone else's free guinea pig for unproven R and D...
... don't want to make that mistake again.
Fill in the step, large dia. 4 blade elephant ear props (at least 18'), get them as low as possible, & notch the hatch on the inside to clear the air cleaners. There you have it!
Slug-ger is offline  
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 11:22 AM
  #26  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Default

Originally Posted by Slug-ger
Fill in the step, large dia. 4 blade elephant ear props (at least 18'), get them as low as possible, & notch the hatch on the inside to clear the air cleaners. There you have it!
Why do want to fill in the step and run old technology props deep in the water? How do you mount ASDs deep? Makes no sense to me. All the diesel ECs with ASDs and the other boats with surface drives run cleavers and it works perfectly. The Fountain hulls, sport and EC hulls have run with ASDs and other surface drives before. I fail to see how it's new. I've never seen a Fountain with a different hull, just because it ran a surface drive.

Carder, if you are seriously considering this, the guys to talk to, are Fountain Performance Marine and Rik. ASDs on Fountains are nothing new, they know how to do it. If the sport series and EC 48 can run surface drives, whether it being ASDs ,#6 and so on, why not the EC38. It's the same kind of hull. Also, according to Rik, notched transoms are in most cases not an issue - if it is, usually a minor one. Just remember that dialing in is a must, there is no such thing as plug and play drive installations.

Fountain guys, do you have an input here?

Last edited by A.O. Razor; 02-09-2012 at 11:46 AM.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Reply
Old 02-09-2012 | 04:23 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A.O. Razor
Why do want to fill in the step and run old technology props deep in the water? How do you mount ASDs deep? Makes no sense to me. All the diesel ECs with ASDs and the other boats with surface drives run cleavers and it works perfectly. The Fountain hulls, sport and EC hulls have run with ASDs and other surface drives before. I fail to see how it's new. I've never seen a Fountain with a different hull, just because it ran a surface drive.

Carder, if you are seriously considering this, the guys to talk to, are Fountain Performance Marine and Rik. ASDs on Fountains are nothing new, they know how to do it. If the sport series and EC 48 can run surface drives, whether it being ASDs ,#6 and so on, why not the EC38. It's the same kind of hull. Also, according to Rik, notched transoms are in most cases not an issue - if it is, usually a minor one. Just remember that dialing in is a must, there is no such thing as plug and play drive installations.

Fountain guys, do you have an input here?
Rik knows my boat very well. Had the installer listened to Rik in the beginning I'm sure it would have worked out differently. The drives were installed too high on the transom due to the 38'S UNUSUALLY HIGH DEEP STEP yes, it is different than other 38"s. In my sitiutaion an ideal install would have been to either fill in the step or make a water deflector to close up some of the step so the angle of attack off the bottom would have been correct. What you are not accounting for in your post is that the step on the 38 sport fish & ec are higher. There is a significant weight difference in the front of both boates that change its planning characteristics compared to the sport boats. If you want surface drives & the speed that goes with them theres no doubt in my mind Rik & who ever he works with can make it happen correctly.He is the man, and the Arnesons are awsome when there installed correctly.

Carver, if you will measure your the center of your propshaft to the running surface you will see that it is 4 to5 inches below the running surface, thats so it will plain out due to cg's heavy in the front. I am currently having 525's installed as we speak, hoping for 70+.
Slug-ger is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2012 | 04:19 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Canada
Default

Anyone else have any input on owning one of these?? Spring is coming and i don't want to be boatless
AB69Z is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2012 | 09:50 PM
  #29  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 2
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by AB69Z
Anyone else have any input on owning one of these?? Spring is coming and i don't want to be boatless
I recently purchased a 2004 38EC through Fountain Performance Marine. I did a lot of research prior to this purchase. I couldn't find any other cruiser this size that had the performance characteristics this boat has.
SR-71 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2012 | 09:59 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 2
From: NC
Default

"I am currently having 525's installed as we speak, hoping for 70+."

Very interested to know how your boat performs with your upgrades. Please keep us informed.

edit:

I contacted Rik at Arneson Surface Drives. He said two 38EC's have been retrofitted with these drives. (I'm guessing Slug-ger's 38 may be one of them.) Rik also stated there are two configurations of the 38EC's hull, one with a transom notch and one without, and stated the one without the notch is not a problem, and he said the one with a notch will work also. The Arneson Bravo conversion kits run $23,125 each.

Big question in my mind is what the performance differences would be when attached to the various 38EC engines (496's, HP500's, or 525's). My thought is, higher performance figures and lesser maintenance costs may make these drives a good deal over time., but I'm new to this game. Any thoughts?

Last edited by SR-71; 02-26-2012 at 09:09 AM.
SR-71 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.