35 lightning twin step bottom
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE, LOTO
Does anyone know if they have done any changes to the 35 twin step bottom? I have a 2000 and I was wondering if they have changed anything over the years other than the x. When they went to the staggered setup did they change anything like step size or location?
The staggered set up is so much faster than the side by side, but couldn't you get the cg set up the same in both styles. Say in a side by side go with aluminum motors and move some weight around.... Just brainstorming. So that being said, then the additional speed would be from moving the drives together to get them farther up. By looking at pictures based off of the bottom of the swim platform the tops of the drives are in roughly just as high in a staggered as a later model side by side. Maybe Reggie will chime in.
The staggered set up is so much faster than the side by side, but couldn't you get the cg set up the same in both styles. Say in a side by side go with aluminum motors and move some weight around.... Just brainstorming. So that being said, then the additional speed would be from moving the drives together to get them farther up. By looking at pictures based off of the bottom of the swim platform the tops of the drives are in roughly just as high in a staggered as a later model side by side. Maybe Reggie will chime in.
#3
No change in step size or location from my 03 to my 09 and pretty sure there was no changes before 03.
The difference between the handling and performance of the two boats is "staggering". Staggered boat does everything better except docking and cockpit space, and motors are so much more fun to access and wrench on.
The difference between the handling and performance of the two boats is "staggering". Staggered boat does everything better except docking and cockpit space, and motors are so much more fun to access and wrench on.
#6
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE, LOTO
I definatley have to agree with the ease of working on stuff. I had to change the bilge pumps when I bought mine and I thought i pulled every muscle in my neck and shoulders trying to reach stuff.
Thanks for the call this morning Reggie. I appreciate all the info you gave me.
Thanks for the call this morning Reggie. I appreciate all the info you gave me.
#7
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,345
Likes: 1,850
From: Merritt Island, FL
I definatley have to agree with the ease of working on stuff. I had to change the bilge pumps when I bought mine and I thought i pulled every muscle in my neck and shoulders trying to reach stuff.
Thanks for the call this morning Reggie. I appreciate all the info you gave me.
Thanks for the call this morning Reggie. I appreciate all the info you gave me.
Or is it double super secret, need to know only?
#8
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE, LOTO
Most of the info was about drive height and set up. He thinks I could put 2" shorties and herrings and pick up a few more mph. The bottoms on the 35's have not changed at all. The staggered weight distribution sounds like its not so much in the foreward to back and more side to side. Moving the motors closer to the center makes them handle better and have less tendancy to want to chine walk.




