Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
Few questions on the 35's >

Few questions on the 35's

Notices

Few questions on the 35's

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-18-2012 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 55
From: Cape coral, FL
Default Few questions on the 35's

Hey guys, hows it goin? I have a few questions as I begin to start thinking about a fountain purchase. This is a purchase that will take some time as other than my house it will be the most money I ever spent.

List of questions as I believe I want a lightning or ex 35 or 38.
I know the lightning is twin step vs single on ex.
I know the lightning has, vacuflush, fridge, swim ladder and anchor locker and the ex does not.

Has anyone added anchor locker to an ex?

Did they stagger the 496 in the ex?
Did anyone ever get a 38 lightning with 496's?
Did they make 38 ex's?
Is it true in 2007 they stopped using real wood in construction?

Anything else I should know about major changes between say 04 and 07 or so.

Im leaning towards 496's because of the gas and go reliability Ive heard of. reading on this board a lot it seems to be the most economical engine put in the fountains. Anyone with better info please chime in.

Any help from the fountain experts would greatly be appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike
Crude Intentions is offline  
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 06:56 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

you have to get a 2007 38 with 525s 97 mph best boat fountain ever made! Ok just sayin that because mine is for sale!
ratedx is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 09:13 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 964
Likes: 489
From: Mass
Default

Has anyone added anchor locker to an ex? Don't think so

Did they stagger the 496 in the ex? No
Did anyone ever get a 38 lightning with 496's? Yes, there was one for sale not too long ago
Did they make 38 ex's? No
Is it true in 2007 they stopped using real wood in construction? No, there is wood in Fountain's construction

Anything else I should know about major changes between say 04 and 07 or so. I believe the new interiors started in 2007/2008 on some models

Im leaning towards 496's because of the gas and go reliability Ive heard of. reading on this board a lot it seems to be the most economical engine put in the fountains. Anyone with better info please chime in.
I have 496's in my 35 Lightning and couldn't be happier

Good luck in your hunt.
techman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 09:43 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 55
From: Cape coral, FL
Default

Techman thanks for your reply. Answered everything. Looks like I'll be saving a little longer for the lightning.
Crude Intentions is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 09:50 AM
  #5  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 964
Likes: 489
From: Mass
Default

If you narrow the choice down to a 35 Lightning or 35 Executioner, there is no question the Lightning is the better boat. It is more modern in every aspect and the benchmark for performance boats in the size range. With the 35 Lightning you also get a few more choices from side by side to staggered and the later models have the newer style cockpits and interiors.

There Executioner is a great boat but based on a much older design. Not that there is anything wrong with that. But the twin step on the bottom of the lightning is like getting more speed for free.

Keep us posted on your hunt.
techman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 12:33 PM
  #6  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Techman,

What does your boat run with the 496's?
sp3132 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 01:16 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,312
Likes: 1,818
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by techman
I have 496's in my 35 Lightning and couldn't be happier

Good luck in your hunt.
I seen that 38 for sell again, I'll try to look it up.

Seemed to me that it would be a great combo if you put a lot of hours on the boat.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 964
Likes: 489
From: Mass
Default

My boat runs 81 WOT at 5150 rpm's running 1.50 XR's and stock B1 28" 4 blades. Most 496 boats run X's not XR's with 1.36 gears and larger props but do about the same top end maybe a little faster since the X's don't have as much parasitic losses as the beefier XR's.

I went with the XR's in case I wanted to up the HP someday. Since these boats have aggressive X-Dim's its easy to surface the props and you have to be your own rev limiter in rough conditions. So having the beefier XR's gives me a little more peace of mind when loading and unloading the props when flying across the wave tops.
techman is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.