Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
1997 35 Lightning speed >

1997 35 Lightning speed

Notices

1997 35 Lightning speed

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-11-2012 | 01:09 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Default 1997 35 Lightning speed

I have come across a smokin deal on a 1997 35' Lightning single step. The only sticking point is that it has 454 MPI Mags (385 HP). How fast can I realistically expect this boat to do? I also have a line on a 99 32' fever, with newly rebuilt 502s. I have read on here that the 32 feels like a lot less boat on the water, vs the 35. Also, I already have a 3/4 ton diesel, so towing either of them wouldn't be an issue.
I boat in North Texas mostly, Lake Lewisville, Possum Kingdom, and Texoma occasionally, so i really don't see much "big water" outside of cruiser wakes. I am leaning towards the 35, just curious if it's going to be a dog getting on plane, and what I'm looking at for top speed. I would be happy in the low 70s, just not sure it's going to get there with that setup. Thanks in advance for the help!
txtraveller2002 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2012 | 06:52 AM
  #2  
sommerfliesby's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 10
From: Frankfort, IL
Default

Absolutely it will run in the low 70s. Candyman here on the board has the same setup on a 97...I've ridden with him and driven the boat...you will not notice the difference getting on plane, for certain, and the boat was only 2-3 mph slower than mine with 502 EFIs.
sommerfliesby is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2012 | 07:44 AM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 32
From: Oneida Lake NY
Default

I agree 100 percent. Kills me how the 502 makes everyone think the 454 is garbage. Both mag engines are great! 30 hp per side and you are worried? if someone had changed the stickers on the intake to 502 mag I bet you wouldn't even know the difference.


The 32 is a good boat. But the 35 has much better resale, sits better in the water. I can't speak for the ride, but I can tell you my 38 is worlds over a 35 in rough so I imagine the 35 would have that advantage on the 32.
4bus is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-2012 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 4bus
I agree 100 percent. Kills me how the 502 makes everyone think the 454 is garbage. Both mag engines are great! 30 hp per side and you are worried? if someone had changed the stickers on the intake to 502 mag I bet you wouldn't even know the difference.


The 32 is a good boat. But the 35 has much better resale, sits better in the water. I can't speak for the ride, but I can tell you my 38 is worlds over a 35 in rough so I imagine the 35 would have that advantage on the 32.
I completely agree with you on the 454 vs the 502. I currently have a 502 in my boat now, and it power seems to flatten out on the top end, and I've read several people feel the same, that the last few hundred RPMs don't seem to make much difference in speed. I know the 454 doesn't do that, I didn't think it would be that big of a difference, i just wanted to make sure before I pulled the trigger on the purchase. Thanks for the reply guys!
txtraveller2002 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-2012 | 01:40 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: cinn,ohio
Default

go for the 35. you won't know the defference . low 70 , no problem
tim brown is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-2012 | 08:37 PM
  #6  
Reggie's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: West Liberty Iowa, 7 MM LOTO
Default

I owned a 32 before my 35, the 32 was a great boat, my first with twin engines, but I really liked the ride of the 35 over the 32 worlds apart.
I had 525's SC in my 35 and it ran 80 MPH with one person light on fuel.
The 32 had 454 mags, and it ran 74 MPH, same deal.
Reggie is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2012 | 10:56 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Osage Beach, MO
Default

I've got Reggies old 35 here for sale, maintained with an open checkbook, motors refreshed by our shop, blowers sent off to the blower shop, drives gone through all this spring, maybe 15-20hrs on boat since this work done. Upgraded JL stereo w/ dash remote. Here's a link with info and pics.

http://www.performanceboatcenter.com...sp?boat_id=602

Glenn
GL@PBC is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2012 | 11:11 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: baltimore MD
Default

Originally Posted by G@G
I've got Reggies old 35 here for sale, maintained with an open checkbook, motors refreshed by our shop, blowers sent off to the blower shop, drives gone through all this spring, maybe 15-20hrs on boat since this work done. Upgraded JL stereo w/ dash remote. Here's a link with info and pics.

http://www.performanceboatcenter.com...sp?boat_id=602

Glenn
Glenn.. what will this boat run top end?
nordy racer is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2012 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: lake norman nc
Default

Is it me or does everyone have problems seeing " Scrolling through" the pics at PBC? they disappear on me when scrolling.
mj2562@bellsouth.net is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2012 | 09:13 PM
  #10  
Reggie's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: West Liberty Iowa, 7 MM LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by nordy racer
Glenn.. what will this boat run top end?
80 mph, but she's a strong strong runner, she'll hang with the big boys. Hated getting rid of that boat, had her for 9 years, longest I've ever owned a boat. We traded for longer Beak. This boat is worth look, for a 1997, she's a solid 9 out of 10.
Reggie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.