Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
2006 vs 2007 38 hull bottom >

2006 vs 2007 38 hull bottom

Notices

2006 vs 2007 38 hull bottom

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-07-2018, 07:55 AM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cape coral, FL
Posts: 4,189
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Gen III? From all research I did on 35-42 fountains the last hull iteration was 2004. That was the last year the 42 was modified. Engine configuration doesn't change the bottom. Hell the mid to late 90s 42s were available side by side, stagger or trips. I think once the 38 got the larger steps in 02 or whenever it stayed that way through production. Same with the 35. Once it was a twin step it didn't change. Same with the single step. R3 told me the single step 35 was same bottom for all of its production. Just the X changed
Crude Intentions is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 06:49 AM
  #12  
Charter Member
Charter Member
Thread Starter
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I.C.U.Lookin
Gen III? From all research I did on 35-42 fountains the last hull iteration was 2004. That was the last year the 42 was modified. Engine configuration doesn't change the bottom. Hell the mid to late 90s 42s were available side by side, stagger or trips. I think once the 38 got the larger steps in 02 or whenever it stayed that way through production. Same with the 35. Once it was a twin step it didn't change. Same with the single step. R3 told me the single step 35 was same bottom for all of its production. Just the X changed
ICU,
Gen III is what i read somewhere, just trying to educated myself on 38's Thanks for your input
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 10:37 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 6,651
Received 1,329 Likes on 742 Posts
Default

Gen III does make since if straight hulls were I, small step II and the large step III.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 01:52 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I put Stellings extension boxes on a 2003 38 semi-stagger and was happy with results. After getting it dialed is with
props and spacers the boat ran 98 with bone stock engines. The boat also had -2 Merc shorties on it. The boat handled great and got on plane like any boat with a high x dimension. It ran great with 4,5, or 6 blade props. The boat ran 94 at the Shootout and always won its class. As far as I know the hulls are all the same from 02 on.
ARB38 is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 02:57 PM
  #15  
Charter Member
Charter Member
Thread Starter
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARB38
I put Stellings extension boxes on a 2003 38 semi-stagger and was happy with results. After getting it dialed is with
props and spacers the boat ran 98 with bone stock engines. The boat also had -2 Merc shorties on it. The boat handled great and got on plane like any boat with a high x dimension. It ran great with 4,5, or 6 blade props. The boat ran 94 at the Shootout and always won its class. As far as I know the hulls are all the same from 02 on.
ARB38,
Thanks for the info, was that with 525's? And your final configuration was Stelling boxes with -2 Merc shorties and what size spacers?
Thanks,
Dean
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 01-08-2018, 06:51 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The boat did have 525’s. The original set up was to have the prop shafts 1 1/4 inches above the bottom of the boat. That was to high. I ended up with a 1/2 spacer which put the prop shafts at 3/4 inch above the bottom and that was the best setup. The boat was great and really surprised a lot of people how good it was to just have 525’s.
ARB38 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 05:54 AM
  #17  
Charter Member
Charter Member
Thread Starter
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARB38
The boat did have 525’s. The original set up was to have the prop shafts 1 1/4 inches above the bottom of the boat. That was to high. I ended up with a 1/2 spacer which put the prop shafts at 3/4 inch above the bottom and that was the best setup. The boat was great and really surprised a lot of people how good it was to just have 525’s.
ARB,
Sounds like you really had her dialed in! Do you happen to have pictures of your final set-up?
Once again, thanks for all your knowledge!
Dean
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 11:45 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Dean, sorry but I do not have any pictures of when I put on the extension boxes. Is a little bit of a project to put them on and get the boat dialed in. The boat was good without them so most people would not care about the gains from the boxes. It ran 91 without the boxes so not to bad. The newer boats with ITS should be pretty close with a little dialing in with props.
ARB38 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:51 PM
  #19  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here it is Al.
Attached Thumbnails 2006 vs 2007 38 hull bottom-e2d5b26f-ae6e-4411-9bca-de8c0f9aeb04.png  
indysupra is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 03:01 PM
  #20  
Charter Member
Charter Member
Thread Starter
 
Dean Ferry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Is. Fl. USA
Posts: 7,212
Received 393 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARB38
Dean, sorry but I do not have any pictures of when I put on the extension boxes. Is a little bit of a project to put them on and get the boat dialed in. The boat was good without them so most people would not care about the gains from the boxes. It ran 91 without the boxes so not to bad. The newer boats with ITS should be pretty close with a little dialing in with props.
ARB,
Thanks for all the info.
Dean
__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Dean Ferry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.