NH House Bill 162
01-07-2006 | 08:55 PM
#71
Registered
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 0
From: In the Mountains
Re: NH House Bill 162
Originally Posted by ^HB162^
I'd like to help you out, but it just aint so. If they slow down and play by the rules, they are welcome to stay. I love to sit on my deck on a weekend and watch them go by, some are just beautiful. There was a new Nor-Tech last summer, best looking boat I ever seen. They say it will go 130.
That's the biggest crock of chit I've ever read in this Forum. I can't even begin to count how many times I read on Don's website on how the objective was to rid "the Lake" of those evil GFBLs. There was even an account of how closed meetings were taking place to plan strategy. I knew you wouldn't have the sack to admit what your true objective is.
Oh, and by the way, your grammar should state either: a) best looking boat I have ever seen OR b) best looking boat I ever saw.
No charge for the English lesson.....
01-07-2006 | 09:01 PM
#72
VIP Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Windham, NH
Re: NH House Bill 162
Originally Posted by pm203
Well, I know Fays does, but he should spend more time cleaning up his $hithole marina. Maybe we should notify the EPA of his toxic yard. Thurstons does because they rent boats and think its better for their business .(Its ok though that they rent boats daily to people who dont know how to drive or navigate with them). Lakeport doesnt support HB162 and is an avid fighter against it. .As far as the Marine patrol leader? He probably was pressured by some senseless politician and is waiting for the outcome. I dont believe he supports it. He said that if the law passes he would uphold it. Most likely just wants to keep his job and you cant blame him for that.
__________________
Chris G.
Chris G.
