Notices
General Boating Discussion

New Engines: 557 or 572

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-19-2006 | 09:22 AM
  #91  
ratman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 7
From: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by JCPERF
And according to Smokey, all the rod does is connect the piston to the crank.
don't be hatin...smakey was way ahead of his time you biotches
ratman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2006 | 09:29 AM
  #92  
ratman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 7
From: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

didn't smokey say there is no substitue for cubic inches?
my new mills are 598ci 4.625 str and 4.530 bore, i figure after a handful of rebuilds they will be square 4.625 X 4.625. im gonna rev then 6200 rpms. we'll see how well the 4 5/8 stroke holds up.
ratman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2006 | 10:55 AM
  #93  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by ratman
don't be hatin...smakey was way ahead of his time you biotches
Only because he cheated like crazy!
mrhorsepower1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2006 | 01:20 PM
  #94  
Strip Poker 388's Avatar
Rob
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 21,637
Likes: 12
From: Ms
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Only because he cheated like crazy!
A different interruptitaion of the rules He was good at it.
__________________
.

The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
Strip Poker 388 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2006 | 12:22 PM
  #95  
MrCIG's Avatar
Charter Member#330
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,377
Likes: 6
From: CHICAGO, IL
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Ok Tall deck 10.2, 4.56 Bore x 4-3/8 crank. What rod Length would you recommend. Naturally aspirated Flat top pistons.

Thanks
Mark
__________________
If you like it rough do it OFFSHORE!!!
MrCIG is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2006 | 01:36 PM
  #96  
Viper31's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Millersville,MD
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by JCPERF
These 557s that make 1100HP went 178 hours since i built them with the big lifters and Isky springs.And they got murdered too.
JC, did you use Isky roller lifters on those mills?
Viper31 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2006 | 01:58 PM
  #97  
RHC's Avatar
RHC
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Sandusky Bay
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Only because he cheated like crazy!
It ain't cheatin if ya don't get caught!!!!

RHC
RHC is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2006 | 02:45 PM
  #98  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by RHC
It ain't cheatin if ya don't get caught!!!!

RHC
True Roger......but it sure is nice when you don't have to and still win!
mrhorsepower1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2006 | 05:24 PM
  #99  
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 214
From: St.Peters,Mo/5mm LOTO/LEOPA
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Originally Posted by GPM
If it's the light weight block you might not want to use it.
How do you tell if you have a lightweight block? What is wrong with it?
flat rate is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-2006 | 02:32 PM
  #100  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: franklin,Tenn.
Default Re: New Engines: 557 or 572

Mark, id go 6.635. Happy b- day. Brian
scarrab30 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.