Tunnel Ram Engines
1 Attachment(s)
Lately there has been a lot of talk regarding tunnel ram engines. I'm surprised they haven't been used by more people. Some guys think they are a high performance engine leftover from the jet boat era.....not true. If you are able to reach your desired performance in the 6-700 h.p. range, tunnel ram engines are a great alternative to supercharging.
Even Mercury has implemented short runner, large plenum, ram type intakes into their high performance EFI engines. I personally have run a set of 555 cu.in. engines with dart tunnel rams for the past 9 years. They've been reliable & performed well. They made 720 HP on 89 octane fuel pushing my 35 Fountain to an average of 97 mph. I recently had them installed in my 38 Fountain which ran a solid 92 mph. I'm looking for more pics and comments on tunnel ram engines. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
ZUL's 750 N/A tunnel rams that are in "Out of Control" Cig TS/TG are probably some of the baddest engines I have EVER heard.
I think one major turn off is the need to go to scoops on the engine hatch. I'd rather have scoops for additional clearance than all the more engine parts and weight associated with superchargers. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
2 Attachment(s)
Here's a Procharged Tunnel Ram 540 that fits under the hatch with no scoop. The sound usually gives away what is hidden underneath.
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
With new cylinder head technology with higher velocity intake ports it's easy to make 700-800 HP with a single 4 barrel set up. But, with a tunnel ram coupled with these new high speed airflow cylinder heads 800 horsepower + is very achievable. I done quite a few of these setups and yes...a set of well set up carbs and the engines are dockable and very dependable as well.
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
2 Attachment(s)
ONESICKGLADIATOR's old 36 Gladiator had a pair of 800+hp Tunnel Ram Zul's. They were the most exotic sounding, non blower motor I have ever heard.
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Stan Pike's 30 foot Sutphen Inferno (Old Sport Class Boat) ran a Tunnel Ram set up on it, in the late 70s, if I remember correctly
They had problems every once on in a while getting it up on plane. Lucky Strike -Steve, you may remember the set up better then I do? Thank you Jim |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Zul is the man on tunnel ram motors
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Yeah,all the pro-stock guys run TUNNEL RAM guess who used to run pro stock???? tripps
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
ant time you can get the fuel a liitle higher up it helps with the adomazation, i dont know if i spelled that right.............anyway,,,,,,,,,tunnel rams are great it is just that blowers have come so far in tech it is just easier to supercharge something than tune a wicked tunnel ram set up.........a blower motor is a lot easier to tune than a na motor in my opinion...............
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
2 Attachment(s)
My 540, built by Blue Thunder.
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
1 Attachment(s)
Hey, why not tunnel ram, EFI and blowers all at once? :evilb:
Seriously though, tunnel rams rule on any V-8. Height and cost are the only reasons not to use them. Take a peek at the latest sheet metal intakes for carbs if your local drag racing engine builder will let you. Some crazy stuff going on in those plenums. Hi Dean! |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Kelly o that is a nice engine what tunnel ram are you using and is it a m3 or m4 pro-charger om looking to do that combo this winter on my htm it has a 598 in it right now
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by tomcat
Hey, why not tunnel ram, EFI and blowers all at once? :evilb:
Seriously though, tunnel rams rule on any V-8. Height and cost are the only reasons not to use them. Take a peek at the latest sheet metal intakes for carbs if your local drag racing engine builder will let you. Some crazy stuff going on in those plenums. Hi Dean! |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
1 Attachment(s)
GLENNS just had Wesseldyk build him a pair of 565cid engines with hyraulic roller cams, 315cc AFR CNC ported heads, 9.3 comp ratio and 34* of timing. and tunnel rams that so far on WESCO's dyno have made 700hp on the nose @5400rpm.
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
like that serpentine set up
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Thanks guys for all the pics and comments - they have been great. I would like to hear some more on performance characteristics. Thanks in advance! :cool:
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
3 Attachment(s)
Here's some Zul motors. Ck out the fuel injection he made .He"s been playing around with some different fuel injection stuff, he also has one with the throttle body's ,Electronic fuel injection made around 848 on pump gas. :drink:
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
how much low end do you lose with this set up?
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by dennis r
Kelly o that is a nice engine what tunnel ram are you using and is it a m3 or m4 pro-charger om looking to do that combo this winter on my htm it has a 598 in it right now
It's a Holley Pro Dominator intake. M4 unit, big pulley...7psi boost. Idles and runs very well with Nickerson prepped carbs. Little rich in secondaries to be safe. 900-950hp. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by tripps
Yeah,all the pro-stock guys run TUNNEL RAM guess who used to run pro stock???? tripps
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Hey Rob, many boat guys are using the Dart cast tunnel ram, but check out the long runners on that sheet metal intake. Do you know any more about that engine?
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by nocigarette
ant time you can get the fuel a liitle higher up it helps with the adomazation, i dont know if i spelled that right.............anyway,,,,,,,,,tunnel rams are great it is just that blowers have come so far in tech it is just easier to supercharge something than tune a wicked tunnel ram set up.........a blower motor is a lot easier to tune than a na motor in my opinion...............
It's "atomization" where the fuel droplets are made small enough by flow turbulence so they burn properly. Tunnel rams really work well from 4000 rpm's and above (like 7000). Since most of the Marine engines top out at around 5800 or so they are not always the best choice. Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by wannabe
Let me splain it for you:
It's "atomization" where the fuel droplets are made small enough by flow turbulence so they burn properly. Tunnel rams really work well from 4000 rpm's and above (like 7000). Since most of the Marine engines top out at around 5800 or so they are not always the best choice. Wannabe Thank you Jim |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
2 Attachment(s)
My favorite.....
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by tomcat
Hey Rob, many boat guys are using the Dart cast tunnel ram, but check out the long runners on that sheet metal intake. Do you know any more about that engine?
Rob :drink: |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
With new cylinder head technology with higher velocity intake ports it's easy to make 700-800 HP with a single 4 barrel set up. But, with a tunnel ram coupled with these new high speed airflow cylinder heads 800 horsepower + is very achievable. I done quite a few of these setups and yes...a set of well set up carbs and the engines are dockable and very dependable as well.
Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by wannabe
What would you say if I could give you NA engines that put out 800 hp on pump gas, idle at 600 rpm, have an "economy" mode for cruising that saved you 7-10% on fuel, cost no more than a good 800 hp engine does (say 18-20k) would this interest you Mrhorsepower? Or anyone else?
Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by Catmando
There's a drag boat(Loose Cannon I believe) that has an 813ci Ford "Mountain Motor" built by someone in Georgia. Hot boat mag ran an article on drag boats with this boat and motor mentioned. Do you know the engine builder?
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Wannabe, what are the specs on your 18k motor, cubic inch, pistons, headers,carb, etc. how many have you built and what boats are they currently in?
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by wannabe
What would you say if I could give you NA engines that put out 800 hp on pump gas, idle at 600 rpm, have an "economy" mode for cruising that saved you 7-10% on fuel, cost no more than a good 800 hp engine does (say 18-20k) would this interest you Mrhorsepower? Or anyone else?
Wannabe 8.9 to 1 compression one carb 875 horses at 6250 rpm Fords:D |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by 2112
I already have these;
8.9 to 1 compression one carb 875 horses at 6250 rpm Fords:D These engines will have the latest EFI. Wiggler- engines are in development, going out to SEMA to do some market intelligence next week. Mrhorsepower- I know you build your own engines, was just testing the waters. Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by wannabe
Carb=Old technology
These engines will have the latest EFI. Wiggler- engines are in development, going out to SEMA to do some market intelligence next week. Mrhorsepower- I know you build your own engines, was just testing the waters. Wannabe What is the name of your company/shop? Or do you work for Sterling? Seen your from Milford,Mi. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by wannabe
Carb=Old technology
These engines will have the latest EFI. Wiggler- engines are in development, going out to SEMA to do some market intelligence next week. Mrhorsepower- I know you build your own engines, was just testing the waters. Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Carbs may be "old" technology but if they where such CaveMan technology Prostock wouldn't making the type of power they do. I wouldn't knock carbs. I can make the same power with a carb than EFI for alot less money. We also currently hold the IHRA World's fastest single 4 barrel record out of my shop @ 6.70 @ 207 with a powerglide trans. NO power adder( NOS , blower ect.) all engine. I do agree EFI is nice and I am doing more and more of it but carbs can still make some AWESOME Horsepower. PM Wannabe with some details on your EFI system.
Wannabe |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
With EFI you have to amortize the expense of development over many units of the same design, i.e. cubic inch, heads, cam, rpm, compression ratio, etc. for it to make economic sense.
Then, there is the per unit expense of computer, sensors, throttle body, etc. Although you may save fuel (in the future), with EFI you have to pay upfront (now)- so the savings are diminished by the time value of money (TVM). Then there are difficulties diagnosing problems with an EFI engine (for the guy without the laptop and associated hardware/software). And, more sensors and electronics to fail. When the crank sensor fails........you have to be towed. Although the carb runs slightly sub-optimized it may be more reliable. Pistons are old technology, V8's are old technology, heads with only 2 valves are old technology. Yes fuel injection is ultimately better from a horsepower, fuel efficiency, idle perspective- but- often carbs serve the purpose just fine.....at a reasonable price. Now back to tunnel rams with carbs/efi. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by vtec
With EFI you have to amortize the expense of development over many units of the same design, i.e. cubic inch, heads, cam, rpm, compression ration, etc. for it to make economic sense.
Then, there is the per unit expense of computer, sensors, throttle body, etc. Although you may save fuel (in the future), with EFI you have to pay upfront (now)- so the savings are diminished by the time value of money (TVM). Then there are difficulties diagnosing problems with an EFI engine (for the guy without the laptop and associated hardware/software). And, more sensors and electronics to fail. When the crank sensor fails........you have to be towed. Although the carb runs slightly sub-optimized it may be more reliable. Pistons are old technology, V8's are old technology, heads with only 2 valves are old technology. Yes fuel injection is ultimately better from a horsepower, fuel efficiency, idle perspective- but- often carbs serve the purpose just fine.....at a reasonable price. Now back to tunnel rams with carbs/efi. |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
1 Attachment(s)
Here's Wette Vette's 598....picked up 4 mph by going from Single plane 1250 Dominator to Tunnel ram and 2X1050 Dominators over the winter in single engine cat.... :drink: How's that for a real world comparison... :D oh yeah, and the boat accelerates harder just about everywhere (except maybe planing off) :D :D
|
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by jdnca1
Here's Wette Vette's 598....picked up 4 mph by going from Single plane 1250 Dominator to Tunnel ram and 2X1050 Dominators over the winter with no other changes in single engine cat.... :drink: How's that for a real world comparison... :D oh yeah, and the boat accelerates harder just about everywhere (except maybe planing off) :D :D
Wouldnt if the motor had a lot of blowby the evac going to the aircleaner cause detination with the oil getting in the intake charge? |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by Strip Poker 388
sounds like it needed more air :drink:
Wouldnt if the motor had a lot of blowby the evac going to the aircleaner cause detination with the oil getting in the intake charge? |
Re: Tunnel Ram Engines
Originally Posted by mrhorsepower1
Wannabe,
What is the name of your company/shop? Or do you work for Sterling? Seen your from Milford,Mi. Wannabe |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.