Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
what gas consumption reading per engine could be logical? >

what gas consumption reading per engine could be logical?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

what gas consumption reading per engine could be logical?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,217
Likes: 573
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default what gas consumption reading per engine could be logical?

15 gal/hour per engine for example at 5000 rpm... does that make sense to you?

That is what my floscan tells me but I feel it must be more than that...

Any idea on that?
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:44 PM
  #2  
chuckbeecher
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere from the Laguna Madre to JAX and beyond
Default

Which engine and h.p.?
Type boat?

Last edited by chuckbeecher; 09-04-2007 at 08:47 PM.
chuckbeecher is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default

check the other thread.
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:46 PM
  #4  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,217
Likes: 573
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

454-485 hp in F35-7 1989
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Mt Pleasant, sc
Default

A good rule of thumb is 10% of Hp @ Wot = GPH.
tigweld is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:50 PM
  #6  
chuckbeecher
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere from the Laguna Madre to JAX and beyond
Default

From past experience I would say it is burning 46-54 gph.
The above would be correct if near max rpm.
My 502/465s burned right at 47 gph wide open throttle.
They were carb motors..efi should be a tad more effecient.
chuckbeecher is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 08:55 PM
  #7  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,217
Likes: 573
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

46-54 per engine or for both?
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 09:05 PM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default

Originally Posted by tigweld
A good rule of thumb is 10% of Hp @ Wot = GPH.
true, but most often under that real world. I've seen it and verified it more than once.

my 350 HP 454 mags would burn ~ 28 GPH WOT (accurately calibrated (<2%) Floscan)
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default

Originally Posted by jeff32
46-54 per engine or for both?
no, that's why I told you in the other thread YOU'RE READING 1/2!

your real GPH is about 30 GPH WOT on those 385's

been there done this! I just can't tell you off the top of my head after a few years and on my 5th 12 hour night shift which switch to change!

call tech! they are fantastic and will give you the answer!
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 09-04-2007 | 10:14 PM
  #10  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Default

If you are making 450 HP at 5000 RPM. My math says at .5 lbs of gas per HP you will use 225 lbs divided by approx 7 lbs per gallon = 32 gal per hr per engine. The FloScan should be reading in range of 29-35 gal per hour per engine
BenPerfected is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.