Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Why Apache are so expensive? >

Why Apache are so expensive?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Why Apache are so expensive?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-28-2007 | 09:38 PM
  #271  
el indio's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by BOBCATMATHEWS
Now you sir are a true tool,the kid is having a lil' fun, and you blow it out of context,he can be very funny.
well now they often call him Speedo but his real name is mister EARL.....as in earl the pearl check out video on apache threads.....m.m........
el indio is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 07:04 AM
  #272  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 5
From: Turku, Finland
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Sunkin
Don't know about that but the 39 Squadron certainly wouldn't be Don's winningest design- so few were made and even fewer were race boats. My guess would be the 35.
I´d agree with Chris on this one.

Also the Wider 33 might be a older style widebody Cig 36 which also has the same beam as the Scarabs...and the look...
Offtopic:
The highest hull number I´ve seen on a Squadron XII 39 is a 1981 model and no 8 of that year, a heavy mother that is bytheway...the bare hull weighs over 6500lbs ...compare that to a race 38 CUV at 5800 complete With Lambos and Sixes...and a Apache41 at 8600...

Last edited by MikeyFIN; 10-29-2007 at 07:11 AM.
MikeyFIN is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 07:10 AM
  #273  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: key west,fl
Default

Originally Posted by el indio
well now they often call him Speedo but his real name is mister EARL.....as in earl the pearl check out video on apache threads.....m.m........
I had a little buzz on last night, i remember some posts from earl,i am amazed i could type anything!
BOBCATMATHEWS is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 08:58 AM
  #274  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN
I´d agree with Chris on this one.

Also the Wider 33 might be a older style widebody Cig 36 which also has the same beam as the Scarabs...and the look...
Offtopic:
The highest hull number I´ve seen on a Squadron XII 39 is a 1981 model and no 8 of that year, a heavy mother that is bytheway...the bare hull weighs over 6500lbs ...compare that to a race 38 CUV at 5800 complete With Lambos and Sixes...and a Apache41 at 8600...
My 33 with race construction, carbon fiber hull, fully rigged, twin fuel tanks and interior weighs in at 9000 lbs.
turbo2256b is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 11:36 AM
  #275  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 5
From: Turku, Finland
Default

Wow thats a lot..the 41 weight I took from El Indios quote once (?).
Not an Epoxy boat is it?
How much without the interior?
MikeyFIN is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 11:44 AM
  #276  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN
Wow thats a lot..the 41 weight I took from El Indios quote once (?).
Not an Epoxy boat is it?
How much without the interior?
My 36' is 9500 lbs. and a full pleasure version.

I think most of the pleasure 41's were sub 12-15K weights. El Indio's being one of the light ones. Not bad for a work boat!
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 11:49 AM
  #277  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Default

When I want to bicker back & forth with teenagers, all I have to do is walk down the hall to their bedrooms. Much easier than typing!
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 11:50 AM
  #278  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by turbo2256b
My 33 with race construction, carbon fiber hull, fully rigged, twin fuel tanks and interior weighs in at 9000 lbs.
What year is it?
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 11:51 AM
  #279  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by MikeyFIN
Wow thats a lot..the 41 weight I took from El Indios quote once (?).
Not an Epoxy boat is it?
How much without the interior?
IIRC, Mark has posted a weight of around 8500# wet & ready. I remember the pics from under the deck- you could tell someone's shoe size if they were standing on top.
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 12:01 PM
  #280  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
Default

I was told all the weight lost with the carbon fiber lay up was added back in the structure of the boat thusly ended up weighing what a standard pleasure version would weigh. I think it will hold 300 gals of gas too. Interior only consists of two 6' settees and a 8' v birth. Two hanging lockers that are going to be removed have something different planned. There is loss of head room and foot room due to the 4 full stringers in the deck and the 5 full ones in the hull. Then theres the full bulk headss about every 18".
turbo2256b is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.