Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........
#61
Alot of this has to do with the builder and balance.
Builder installs mega HP motors, #6 drives and adds 3 more batteries. What does that do to the original balanced design of that boat - likely stern heavy?
Ever heard a builder say: "If you want A/C then I need to add 2 more batteries so the boat stays in balance"?
I am not sure who designs all the big names in boats, but AT is a Harry Schoell design and the Cig Top Gun is Michael Peters.
Now, if Cig or AT gets an order for a boat, and the guy wants big power and #6 drives, do you think either of these manufacturers call the designer and see what needs to be done to offset the added weight so the boat is as the designer intended?
Builder installs mega HP motors, #6 drives and adds 3 more batteries. What does that do to the original balanced design of that boat - likely stern heavy?
Ever heard a builder say: "If you want A/C then I need to add 2 more batteries so the boat stays in balance"?
I am not sure who designs all the big names in boats, but AT is a Harry Schoell design and the Cig Top Gun is Michael Peters.
Now, if Cig or AT gets an order for a boat, and the guy wants big power and #6 drives, do you think either of these manufacturers call the designer and see what needs to be done to offset the added weight so the boat is as the designer intended?
#62
There is more to it than that. The Fountain Factory is 2 hours away and so is Joey Griffin - my engine builder and most know the relation of Joey Griffin & Fountain. That said, I have spent some time down there to ask questions. Fountain uses twin step design because they want their boats to be the fastest / safest boat they can build.
But the following is what I learned at Tres' school:
The single step hull design makes for a skittish ride, plus the pivot point when turning is farther forward. Multiple steps generally ride better and are more predictable in turns and the pivot point is rearward (where the weight is) and thus turns more confidently.
I assume that if you want a better riding more predictable turning boat especially at high speeds, then most builders are going to use and "dial in" what works better.
If you doubt me, I'll be glad to refer you to Tres Martin.
But the following is what I learned at Tres' school:
The single step hull design makes for a skittish ride, plus the pivot point when turning is farther forward. Multiple steps generally ride better and are more predictable in turns and the pivot point is rearward (where the weight is) and thus turns more confidently.
I assume that if you want a better riding more predictable turning boat especially at high speeds, then most builders are going to use and "dial in" what works better.
If you doubt me, I'll be glad to refer you to Tres Martin.
While the pivot point of a single step (in this case example, the AT), is further forward than a twin step anything, you can take this to the bank: The single step will ALWAYS pivot on that one step, guaranteed; at 30, 50, 90, 110, -whatever mph. OCCASIONALLY, a multiple step boat, with confusion between the driver input, seas, load, fuel, weight transfer, speed, trim settings, etc, will pick a different pivot point (step) than the driver expects. This will not happen with a single step bottom design. Can you swap ends on a single step bottom? You bet. Can you do it on a multiple step bottom? Yes. Can you do it on a straight bottom? Yep, can be done. (With the proper training and experience, i.e. gained from Tres' class, you can make any boat do just about any turn, but you have to know how to turn, how to equal the pressure on both sides of the hull, etc. etc.)
(Great media: The Donzi videos that were shot for Miami Vice promos REALLY show how a multiple step boat turns. You can clearly see the transom taking a different track than each of the steps, and you see the water stream/cut off of each step. Those videos were done in FLAT water. If you are in ROUGH water, each of those steps is not going to be in contact with the water at all times. In that case, a step that is in the air, not water, will NOT be acting as pivot point.)
Also, just for example, an AT is going to have a pivot point further forward, based on weight distribution/COG as compared to ANY TS/TG, as the AT has a full finished cabin, comparatively having considerable more nose weight than a 1/2 cabin derivative boat.
Again, this is not a better than/worse than situation; just something to account for.
You were in the boat when Tres (purposely) whipped the 180* turn in Rich's AT. What did you think? Was it skittish? Would you have liked that same turn in your boat? Just curious.
Last edited by Sydwayz; 12-22-2007 at 10:38 AM.
#63
____________________________
Great thread Gerrard!
Last edited by Sydwayz; 12-22-2007 at 10:34 AM.
#64
Well it sucks if your an AT owner that say has 496's and are sick of going 75 mph and want to put in some big power and 6 drives, not only do you have to rework the transom the whole bottom has to be re worked if it can be.
#65
Registered
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Great thread, Monstaaa has shared an example with the 24 and 28 skater. It is a good example highlighting that speed is effected as much or more by hull design than length and even weight.
There is so much more to a great boat ride than how fast or smooth it rides. There must be a thousand different things that play a part. Personal preference varies as much as the boats themselves.
So aside for speed it is all subjective, handling, how smooth the ride is, how good in the rough. Even quality becomes subjective at times.
There is so much more to a great boat ride than how fast or smooth it rides. There must be a thousand different things that play a part. Personal preference varies as much as the boats themselves.
So aside for speed it is all subjective, handling, how smooth the ride is, how good in the rough. Even quality becomes subjective at times.
#66
#68
This has been a great thread...
This applies to all boats, and the chances of someone going to larger power, upgrading to 6's, adding a tranny, more batteries and so on..it obviously would be WAY more cost effective to sell the boat, and start fresh.
My experience with 2000 single step Top Gun that I owned vs the Single step 2003 37 A.T. is not even close, as to ride quality, steering at certain speeds (twin step TG is excellent-just so you Cig guys didnt get your panties all in a bunch
)...Too much hear say on this thread, unless you've owned one or driven one. Where's the 38PP when you need them.
#69
It's funny how you say that, 4 years ago when I wanted to sell my 42 Sonic to get something faster almost everybody on here was telling me to add superchargers or big power to my 42.drop 100k for 10 mph on a flat bottom boat
where were you then.
I would be interested to know what other builders change the bottom for what power is ordered, from what Terry Sobo told me my 98 50 Nortech has the same bottom a 2008 has, just the cockpit liner has changed. I would think that if alot of builders do it when you are buying a used boat you better make sure it has close to the same stuff it was ordered with.
#70
Banned
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
But the following is what I learned at Tres' school:
The single step hull design makes for a skittish ride, plus the pivot point when turning is farther forward. Multiple steps generally ride better and are more predictable in turns and the pivot point is rearward (where the weight is) and thus turns more confidently.
The single step hull design makes for a skittish ride, plus the pivot point when turning is farther forward. Multiple steps generally ride better and are more predictable in turns and the pivot point is rearward (where the weight is) and thus turns more confidently.
Last edited by mccaffertee; 12-22-2007 at 01:03 PM.



