Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Twin Or Triple In A 40-42 Feet??? >

Twin Or Triple In A 40-42 Feet???

Notices
General Boating Discussion
View Poll Results: in a 40-42 boat if you had to choose
twin
74
83.15%
triple
15
16.85%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Twin Or Triple In A 40-42 Feet???

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-24-2008 | 04:55 PM
  #21  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,232
Likes: 582
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

GLH! I knew you would chime in, but not with that type of answer!

Last edited by jeff32; 01-24-2008 at 06:14 PM.
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2008 | 04:56 PM
  #22  
tomtbone1993's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,491
Likes: 7
From: LAKE CONROE, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Rare Breed
Ask Dereberry how many I blew in my trip, it didnt do to bad @ 700hp ea., re-did them to alittle over 800hp, and blew ( built drives with good parts) pretty much every weekend!
I have not had my engines Dynoed but I would guess between 620 - 650HP

My 29 Fountain with 502's went through 2 drives in 3 years.

A new big stepped bottom hull I would want staggered. Older straight hull, I like the triples, just rides Smooth...hence the name of my rig Smooth Operator
tomtbone1993 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2008 | 07:55 PM
  #23  
bajaholic's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 370
From: 20.5 mm LOTO
Default

I have trip HO's. If money was no option, I would have rather had big twins (700's or larger) and get the same or better speed. However, with HO's I get realiability, performance and overall lower cost.

The trip handles MUCH better @ manuevering (can use the third engine as the compensator when getting into slips etc.

Overall mileage is way better than twins. (They work alot easier for the same amount of speed). thus lower rpms, less gas etc.

Down side, everything costs triple, maintenance, props etc...
bajaholic is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2008 | 10:53 PM
  #24  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 618
Likes: 33
From: North Barrington
Default

Originally Posted by fountain 47 sc
I have triples on a 47 and I know that wasn't the question but there are a few clear advantages. There is less stress on each motor and drive. I trim the center out a little further than the outers because when equally trimmed it does have more stress (more fuel, runs hotter, lower rpm). If it is trimmed higher they run better. I think I use the same amount of fuel as twins but a huge advantage is much lower power per motor and dramatically increased engine life.
By trimming the center drive further out, wouldn't it mal-align the tie bars and toe out the noses of the outer drives?
AO31 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2008 | 10:01 PM
  #25  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,232
Likes: 582
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

funny tread! I asked the same questions to a couple guy here, and they all chose twin in the first place, then I told them about the positive point you guys with triple pointed out, and they almost all changed their mind! They'd go triple! Primairly for reliability reason and getting cheap''stock OEM'' drives and engines in case it goes bad...

I never thought it would turn this way! But I sure want to test drive a triple before I change my formula... saw a couple nice 419 formulas and 42 lightning...Sonic also...
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 12:01 AM
  #26  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Grand Lake (E-Dock Junior Varsity)
Default

spent a weekend on a loaner baja 410 with trip 525s.. never again.. the fuel consumption was absolutely absurd. $100 a mile. the nice thing (sorta) was when we had the 1/2 mile idle in and out of the cove, we could just run the center motor and it did just fine. it was a heavy heavy boat though.. if i had to do it in that size, i think id go with big twins vs triples. seems like it used up sooo much room in the cockpit. you could add a second set of bolsters in the room youd save from not running triples..
plus the cost of yet ANOTHER motor when it comes to maintenance..
thats my two cents, never owned a triple and doubt i ever would..
waterboy222 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 05:37 AM
  #27  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,232
Likes: 582
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

the last 2 post are exactly opposite, and that is the funny part! I think both of you are right! That's why I guess I'd really have to test drive before buying...
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 06:19 AM
  #28  
BBB725's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 1
From: Wi/ Fl Keys
Default

I've had both and the ride is better in the triple and it uses more fuel, but be honest if everyone was worried about fuel economy you would be in alot smaller boat. The biggest issue will be trying to sell it, make sure you buy it at a good price.
BBB725 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 07:54 PM
  #29  
trips2win's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: LOTO
Default

funny thread everyone has different ideas of the power and size and make of our boats and purpose, thats what makes this one of the best stress relief, for me that is, its what makes us smile the most when we turn keys is the right answer and i do like mine.
trips2win is offline  
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 09:30 PM
  #30  
BRD
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Mentor , Ohio
Default

Heard thru the grapevine there is an awesome triple 800/#5 Saber 41 coming up on the market in Grand Haven Michigan ...
BRD is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.