2009 GM marine line up ..!
#11
The GM LSA is nice, but in my opinion Raylar's LSM-550 would be a much better way to go! Basically the same power with no supercharger and no need to run premium fuel. It suprises me GM would release a 'marine' engine that requires premium (I assume that means 91 octane minimum). I know I can't get that at any of the marinas near us. Our marina has 89, and that is all the LSM-550 requires.
Yep, more cubic inches (450 Vs 376) and fewer parts to break (no supercharger) makes a lot more sense to me! Now if I could only afford a couple...
http://www.raylarengine.com/550_engine.html
Yep, more cubic inches (450 Vs 376) and fewer parts to break (no supercharger) makes a lot more sense to me! Now if I could only afford a couple...

http://www.raylarengine.com/550_engine.html
#12
Registered

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 19
From: Washington, MO
Wild is right! I have to think with the weight savings and going from 640 to 1100 HP, low to mid 90's is very possible. Probably turn fairly tall 5-blade props and get better mid-range mpg than the stock 6.2's!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formulabill
Poker Runs and Boating Events
31
06-01-2009 08:47 PM
KennyOffShore
Offshoreonly Industry News
0
04-16-2008 02:25 PM




