![]() |
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 |
Interesting...that 36 is a slow poke:lolhit::boat:
|
Originally Posted by Tsunami LC
(Post 3234764)
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 |
I'd say the 388 is the ticket!
|
Originally Posted by dkwestern
(Post 3234898)
True. However Flight Clubs 36 hit 140 with 850's. Skaters #'s on the website seem to be off a bit.
|
Originally Posted by Tsunami LC
(Post 3234764)
From the Skater website, models with 850's:
32 140MPH+ 36 120-125MPH+ 368 140MPH+ 40 135MPH No numbers given on the 388 The info on their website, is terrible at best. The insurance companies won't even use it for reference. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsugh2.gif The 368 & 388 are "supposed" to be the fastest all around hulls, but since they are all 99% custom built, there could be an exception to the rule at every size, depending on the setup. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsughno.gif |
What did the 32 with Merc 850's run from the Miami boat show in '04 or '05?? Yellow boat, tested in PRA mag I believe.
I also read on here (for ref) that a 368 with Merc 600's/#6 drives ran 127, out east. |
Originally Posted by BLee
(Post 3234937)
The info on their website, is terrible at best. The insurance companies won't even use it for reference. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsugh2.gif
The 368 & 388 are "supposed" to be the fastest all around hulls, but since they are all 99% custom built, there could be an exception to the rule at every size, depending on the setup. http://smiliesftw.com/x/hsughno.gif There was a 388 1075 boat at LOTO, that Blume semed to know. |
I would think that the additional tunnel width & length of the 36 & 388 would make up for the weight disadvantage & then again layup comes into play. The results might also differ if you were comparing boats w/ 850's then compared the same 2 boats w/ 1000+ hp. There's obviously an minimum / optimum HP to weight ratio for each model & IMO once surpassed there maybe diminishing returns meaning the bigger HP will benefit the larger boats more than the smaller ones.
|
Originally Posted by NASCAT
(Post 3235060)
I would think that the additional tunnel width & length of the 36 & 388 would make up for the weight disadvantage & then again layup comes into play. The results might also differ if you were comparing boats w/ 850's then compared the same 2 boats w/ 1000+ hp. There's obviously an minimum / optimum HP to weight ratio for each model & IMO once surpassed there maybe diminishing returns meaning the bigger HP will benefit the larger boats more than the smaller ones.
Like I said, I think all things being equal the 32 will be faster (in the proper conditions). With that said, obviously the bigger boats have a huge advantage once the conditions get rougher... |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.