![]() |
Originally Posted by PARADOX
(Post 3397718)
2005 IS NEWER style.
I'm working on a "No leak" header design. Getting close. If I have some time, I will find when CMI sold the Co. and some changes happened. There is a way to "fix" (or at least help) that problem with the 1/4" gap. :) |
Originally Posted by Dave M
(Post 3397701)
Well, now I'm confused. I read that "newer" style did not have the outer tubes directly to the flange. My 525 is a 2005 model.
|
Originally Posted by bert4332
(Post 3398085)
Definitely share your fix to the 525 header problem!!!
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution. This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger. Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube. In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also. Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP. |
Originally Posted by TWIN-SPINS
(Post 3398166)
the newer style does not,,,does not ,,,have the outer tube welder to the flange,,
Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best. |
Originally Posted by Dave M
(Post 3398249)
That's what I thought. But Paradox said that CMI says that the 1/4" gap is the problem. Wouldn't that would mean that the "newer" sytle is prone to cracks too?
Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best. Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap. I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems. |
Originally Posted by PARADOX
(Post 3398290)
Dave
Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap. I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems. The procedure you described includes adding material to the area of the gap. The GAP is the weak point So, the newer style is prone to cracking issues too. |
is this related mostly to the 525's
|
Originally Posted by JMPH
(Post 3398810)
is this related mostly to the 525's
|
Originally Posted by Baja_man
(Post 3398828)
Mainly 525....more so with staggard 525's....but limited too just those.
Many CMI headers have problems. 496's, 500's ,525's, 600, 700. and even others. 525's are one of the most sold. Thus, most referenced. |
I thought this "gap" is what CMI called their "cool collar" design that was supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread in the world of water cooled marine tube headers ... rendering those designs without it inferior and obsolete? The direct welded tubes like the old E-Top style are better, now? Are the one's with the "gap" cracking predominantly interally or externally at that junction from one tube to two tubes? I guess I'm confused now. :confused:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.