![]() |
Anybody have or ever use a Garmin 431
Anybody have or use one? Thinking about that or getting a used 176c. What one would be better. Also the 431 says it has maps, are they good enough and helpful.
|
i know the dimensions but I just dontw want it to be huge either
|
I have the Garmin 545s and love it. I bought the extra maps along with the Bluechart Vision. Used it down at Tickfaw and I had a bunch of folks following me to avoid all the shallow spots and under water wrecks. Small enough to be on my dash with out taking away from the other gauges.
|
thanks looks to be same size as the 431. I got a fountain and just dont want it to look gawdy
|
I have the Garmin 440. Not a bad unit, wish I could have gotten the 500 series, but it didn't fit. I have the Bluechart Vision as well. Without that, it's a fairly plain unit. MegaGPS had a big sale, and practically gave away the Bluechart card.
|
the only differance I could find between the 431 and the 500 series was the 500 series came preloaded with coastal areas instead of inland lakes that the 431 does.
|
Originally Posted by VtSteve
(Post 3405759)
I have the Garmin 440. Not a bad unit, wish I could have gotten the 500 series, but it didn't fit. I have the Bluechart Vision as well. Without that, it's a fairly plain unit. MegaGPS had a big sale, and practically gave away the Bluechart card.
|
Originally Posted by jmeng
(Post 3405824)
Interesting. I have the 440 and find that the built in maps are great. Shows the channel, water depths, buoys, marina's, etc. Haven't seen a reason to buy the chip.
Originally Posted by Fountain4402
(Post 3405803)
the only differance I could find between the 431 and the 500 series was the 500 series came preloaded with coastal areas instead of inland lakes that the 431 does.
|
Originally Posted by VtSteve
(Post 3405986)
My Navionics app for 10 bucks on my phone gives better graphics.
One thing I don't like about 440 (and I assume all the new Garmin's are the same) is the number of steps you have to go through to "go to" a way point. The old Garmin's were much easier. |
Originally Posted by jmeng
(Post 3406172)
Guess its just a matter of me not knowing what I'm missing. Just so I understand, is it prettier graphics or more info?
One thing I don't like about 440 (and I assume all the new Garmin's are the same) is the number of steps you have to go through to "go to" a way point. The old Garmin's were much easier. My question does the 400 series pre loaded maps have depth |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.