Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Mercury Racing 565 Not ‘Recalled’ >

Mercury Racing 565 Not ‘Recalled’

Notices

Mercury Racing 565 Not ‘Recalled’

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-14-2012, 08:44 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
ActiveThunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida
Posts: 3,528
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I like the new engines.

Last edited by ActiveThunder; 03-15-2012 at 08:22 AM.
ActiveThunder is offline  
Old 03-14-2012, 11:44 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 6,651
Received 1,329 Likes on 742 Posts
Default

Do these use the same headers as the 525's?
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Old 03-15-2012, 01:25 PM
  #23  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
ACTIVESHACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aspen, CO
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
Do these use the same headers as the 525's?
In the pics. I've seen they appear to be the same. Mercury has to be aware of the defects with these by now.
ACTIVESHACK is offline  
Old 03-16-2012, 12:29 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by C_Spray
Hmmm... "Recall" is exactly the term car manufacturers use when they ask customers to return products in order to replace some component with a better one. Interesting that valve seats would be an issue in big blocks after almost 50 years of development.

Anyway - Kudos to Mercury Racing for standing behind their product. It's a good thing that they caught the problem early.
Agreed.

2 thoughts

1. Cut the "wordsmithing." Just be straight up.

2. Stand up job on taking care of your customers and keeping us believing in your products.

To be fair - any component can be an issue- Ilmor had a spring problem early on and went to every client affected and changed them out on the spot.

You dont have to mince words when doing the right thing.
Give it to us straight up and well respect you even more than we already do.

Uncle Dave

Last edited by Uncle Dave; 03-16-2012 at 12:38 PM.
Uncle Dave is offline  
Old 03-16-2012, 01:25 PM
  #25  
Correspondent
Correspondent
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,769
Received 2,748 Likes on 1,234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Dave
Agreed.

2 thoughts

1. Cut the "wordsmithing." Just be straight up.

2. Stand up job on taking care of your customers and keeping us believing in your products.

To be fair - any component can be an issue- Ilmor had a spring problem early on and went to every client affected and changed them out on the spot.

You dont have to mince words when doing the right thing.
Give it to us straight up and well respect you even more than we already do.

Uncle Dave
Hi Dave,

I don't want to revisit this in depth. But if you read back, one of people who posted suggested that product "update" is more accurate than "recall," and based on the situation itself and the lexicon used in the automobile world (and the software wold but that's a weak comparison, I admit), I too, believe "update" more accurate.

No "wordsmithing." The goal is word accuracy.

I'll draw the same analogy I drew before, and leave it alone because I don't hope to change minds, merely support my decisions:

In journalism, when you run a "correction" you vow to work harder next time. When you run a "retraction" someone loses his job. And yet the public uses the terms interchangeably all the time.

Of course, you are entitled to disagree. All the best.
Matt Trulio is offline  
Old 03-16-2012, 01:51 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Im under the impression you are passing along the message accurately as its given to you - rather than crafting it for Mercury Marine.

I could easily be wrong.

Fair enough though in any case.

Thank you Matt.


Uncle Dave

Last edited by Uncle Dave; 03-16-2012 at 02:04 PM. Reason: added "thanks"
Uncle Dave is offline  
Old 03-16-2012, 04:22 PM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Traverse City MI
Posts: 3,592
Received 278 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

I think the real problem here is how UGLY the engine is.....When is Mercury going to "UPDATE" that problem!!!

Matt, you did the right thing by informing us whats going on, and we all appreciate that. Thanks
offshorexcursion is offline  
Old 03-16-2012, 09:43 PM
  #28  
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
 
C_Spray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
I think the real problem here is how UGLY the engine is.....When is Mercury going to "UPDATE" that problem!!!
Done. The valve seats made it look much better.:
Attached Thumbnails -ilmor_mv8_570.jpg  
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
C_Spray is offline  
Old 03-17-2012, 06:49 AM
  #29  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Perfect Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 518
Received 42 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C_Spray
Done. The valve seats made it look much better.:
I agree... Perfect!
__________________
Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
Perfect Storm is offline  
Old 03-17-2012, 07:08 AM
  #30  
Registered
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

Why all of the fuss over a word? Some people need to go boating more I think. If Mercury Racing is comfortable allowing a customer to run these engines until the first service interval then they must be comfortable that there will not be a catastrophic failure. I am sensing some bitterness and maybe jealousy here.

I also like this engine with the exception of the top cover. If there is a cover like that it is usually to hide something ugly.......
thirdchildhood is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.