Diesel-Powered 52-foot Outerlimits Hits 94 mph
#21
Excellent job to the entire OL crew..that is awesome..94mph out of a 52' long boat..closest thing out there is the 50 Hustler at around 87mph..much smaller boat...and the heavier 52' NT at 76mph....
Im curious with a pair..would 82mph be obtainable...very cost effective package.
Any engine bay shots.. Thanks Jeff
Im curious with a pair..would 82mph be obtainable...very cost effective package.
Any engine bay shots.. Thanks Jeff
#22
Registered

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 539
Likes: 26
#23
Thread Starter
Correspondent


Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,742
Likes: 4,339
Dean,
I don't but I'll find out and report back on Monday. That said, I suspect that even with epoxy/carbon/kevlar lay-up it's a hefty beast, which will make the performance that much more impressive. Stay tuned.
Funny thing ... I just talked my girlfriend out of a diesel BMW and into a gasoline version of the same model. I need to loose my anti-diesel bias!
I don't but I'll find out and report back on Monday. That said, I suspect that even with epoxy/carbon/kevlar lay-up it's a hefty beast, which will make the performance that much more impressive. Stay tuned.
Funny thing ... I just talked my girlfriend out of a diesel BMW and into a gasoline version of the same model. I need to loose my anti-diesel bias!
#25
Banned
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Tx
#26
Banned
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Tx
"...Funny thing ... I just talked my girlfriend out of a diesel BMW and into a gasoline version of the same model. I need to lose my anti-diesel bias!" [Fixed your typo]
Yes that was a mistake. You won't find a cleaner, more powerful car diesel than the 3.0L BMW engine. 35mpg is hard to match with the gas motor...in fact it can't be done. Less than 7sec to 60 with a diesel is not too shabby either.
Yes that was a mistake. You won't find a cleaner, more powerful car diesel than the 3.0L BMW engine. 35mpg is hard to match with the gas motor...in fact it can't be done. Less than 7sec to 60 with a diesel is not too shabby either.
#27
Banned
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Tx
Excellent job to the entire OL crew..that is awesome..94mph out of a 52' long boat..closest thing out there is the 50 Hustler at around 87mph..much smaller boat...and the heavier 52' NT at 76mph....
Im curious with a pair..would 82mph be obtainable...very cost effective package.
Any engine bay shots.. Thanks Jeff
Im curious with a pair..would 82mph be obtainable...very cost effective package.
Any engine bay shots.. Thanks Jeff
#29
Registered

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
I hate to say it, but this inline-6 is better than V8 is urban legend. I spoke to a Cummins engineer once, and asked him about why they use I6's instead of V8's. His response was "packaging", and slight cost reduction. There have been V8 diesel marine engines over the years by Catapillar, Cummins, and others, that ran just fine.
Michael
#30
Registered

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
At Cat we use 90* V's instead of 60*. A 60* would be perfectly balanced in a V12 configuration. But with the 90* we can have better harmonics in V8, V16, and V20 configurations. It's a compromise.


