Like Tree0Likes

twin 550hp on a 28 Skater guess mph?

Reply
Old 07-10-2002, 01:13 PM
  #31
Registered
 
SR-24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OK
My Boats: 2003, Baja, 33' Outlaw
Posts: 410
Default

I'm just curious as to why there is so much concern about there being two big blocks in that Skater. Are the Skaters really light boats or something? The 30' Eliminator goes well over 100 with twin big blocks.
SR-24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 01:49 PM
  #32
Registered
 
skatermike24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St.Cloud , Florida Osceola County
My Boats: 1995 Skater 24
Posts: 879
Default

Cause you don't normally see a 28 with inboard power!
Most 28's are rigged with outboards.
skatermike24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 01:57 PM
  #33
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CigDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
My Boats: Cigarette 35 Cafe Racer
Posts: 21,346
Default

What Mike said...

...And typically it's advisable not to have the engines/drives outweigh the boat. The 28 is something like 2100# empty. That's a nice big, concentrated mass pretty far aft.
CigDaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 02:57 PM
  #34
Registered
 
Brad Zastrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: McHenry, Illinois
Posts: 2,244
Default

I have admired your work and enthusiasm for this project but, this boat will be a handful to drive. The 28 Skater has the fuel tanks in the back half of the boat and the hull was normally rigged with 350 lb. outboards. Even three outboards will weigh far less than than one big block and out drive. I will also assume that the big blocks are right at the transom rather than moved foward with driveshafts to balance the boat. I assume this because there is not enough room to move them forward. I have to ask....does this thing even float? Three outboards make the 28' float nose high as it is. The boat is far too tail heavy. I do speak from a small amount of expierence as my boats are a 30' Motion with triple Mercs and a 35' Motion with twin 1000hp engines. Even the 35 has 3' driveshafts to balance the boat. The o/bs would have been a better choice. My outboard boat will out run anything to 100 mph and keep on going to 114. Use less fuel, more reliable, tremendous throttle response (destroys PWC from a dead start drag race). The big gun is for the really wicked top speed in the big water. I still say 115mph if the porpoise does not become crazy.
Brad Zastrow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 04:07 PM
  #35
Official OSO boat whore
Charter Member
Trade Score: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mequon, WI
My Boats: 8' row boat
Posts: 6,157
Default

Brad-arn't you hacking the canopy off your motion?
Cord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 04:45 PM
  #36
ali-cat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would think you would run in the 140's. My 36 which is completely open with 575's & 6's does between 110-116. Let me know. You have a completely enclosed canopy. Looks sharp
Let us know!!!!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2002, 06:52 PM
  #37
Registered
 
Cattitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK, Grand, Beaver, LOTO
My Boats: '97 Scarb Thunder, '06 Formula 330ss for sale
Posts: 1,213
Default Other "successful" applications

Hi guys- I know not everyone is a fan of west cost boats but before this ambitious project gets poo-poo'd too much...

Aren't there documented 28 Daytonas with twin steel big blocks doing 115-130 (Hotboat about a year back)

MNFast boat has a 28 Advantage cat with twin steel 502's that has seen 90's and no offense but some of that length is swim platform.

The canopy has to add some weight up front, have the fuel tanks been relocated?

I'm no expert but it seems there is some precedent and logic here. It may not be the safest or fastest setup but a fast cruiser with the potential to generate bigger numbers and the inherent smiles when the conditions permit?

Last edited by Cattitude; 07-10-2002 at 06:56 PM.
Cattitude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2002, 07:29 PM
  #38
Registered
Thread Starter
 
timucin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: istanbul
Posts: 1,577
Default

cattitude:
fuel tanks have been relocated,we took them to the front as much as possýble.using plastýc fuel tanks(not sure about the compound but not chrome or steel)
engines are all aluminum except blocks.
batteries are at the front

thought too much about taking the engines to the front by using shafts;actually ordered and received the neccessary parts but I think I will not need them besides it needs a serious redesign work at the back of the boat.
will try and see with this config.
timucin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2002, 10:11 AM
  #39
Uncle Toys
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

timucin – Hope you don’t mind me bringing this back to the top. I was searching for something else when I ran across your thread. This is super interesting. Any updates?

p.s. Sure do appreciate all the help your country has given us during these trying times!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2002, 01:20 PM
  #40
T2x
Allergic to Nonsense
Platinum Member
 
T2x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Granite Quarry, NC
My Boats: 1966 !8' Switzer Wing "Miss Diablo" 1968 Switzer Wing "Dust'n the Wind 2",, 1960 Powercat 15C , 1977 17' Molinari w/Evinrude CCC
Posts: 5,004
Default

Random thoughts:
After looking at those props and drives........ I'm reducing my speed estimate to 125.

The key question so far is........................ Will it float?

The comparison to California cats is not a good one....... Left coasters stick V-8's in anything.......That doesn't make it sensible......nor particularly desireable. The 28 is an outboard design (as in original concept by builder). The boat was specifically tailored for 2 (not 3) 2.5 Merc outboards. The 28's with 300x's are slightly tail heavy as it is...... both at rest and in rough seas........

The flatbed boat hauler is priceless................

The comments on the 2.5's in Turkey make me wonder about the fuel over there, as mine run like tops.......with virtually no problems. Granted the TPI settings are critical on these motors and you better have a Mercury computer to assure that all electronic functions are in acceptable ranges. After that the engines are basically bullet proof.

Good luck and be safe.

T2x

Last edited by T2x; 09-17-2002 at 01:29 PM.
T2x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rbhudelson
General Boating Discussion
23
06-12-2007 08:41 PM
skaterjim
General Boating Discussion
30
09-12-2006 05:24 PM
Shane
General Boating Discussion
49
12-17-2004 09:46 PM
timucin
General Boating Discussion
8
03-12-2003 08:41 PM
timucin
General Q & A
26
06-12-2002 07:02 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.