Notices

Used Boat "Hours"

Old 01-01-2013, 10:31 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 967
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brett_p
Depends on the age, 300 hours on a 10 year old motor isn't bad. 30 hours a year for example however 300 hours on a 2 year old motor is bad
Keeping the golden rule of salt water in mind (if it ain't running it's rotting) I would prefer the 2yr old motor with 300 hours.

One of the local PD's had 502 powered Scarabs that would run anywhere from 3,000 to 5,000 on a set of engines.

Happy New Years,
RB
Powerquest230 is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:14 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Remember, stock bbc 454/502 require a top end rebuild at every 250-350hrs, that's approx. $2500. 500-600hrs require bottom end, that's not cheap, so consider the hours and ask if top and bottom rebuilds where done timely. 496 is different, and a lot more stout, I think it's 800hrs for the first rebuild.

Good Luck
bert4332 is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:37 PM
  #23  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chalmette, LA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by POWERPLAY J
So answer the question. How is a 2 year old engine with 300hrs worse than a 10 year old engine with 300hrs?
Who said it was worse? I said that 300 hours in 2 years is bad compared to 300 hours over 10 years and by bad I didn't mean that the motor is "bad" just referring to it having a lot of use in a shorter period of time. I've taken my boat out almost every weekend since I bought it in June and I still haven't put 30 hours on it yet so to me someone that puts 100+ hours in a year is a lot. That's just my opinion but opinions are like azzholes, everybody has one!
brett_p is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:39 PM
  #24  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chalmette, LA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Powerquest230
Keeping the golden rule of salt water in mind (if it ain't running it's rotting) I would prefer the 2yr old motor with 300 hours.

One of the local PD's had 502 powered Scarabs that would run anywhere from 3,000 to 5,000 on a set of engines.

Happy New Years,
RB
Not everyone is running in saltwater though.
brett_p is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:42 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,003
Received 734 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bert4332
Remember, stock bbc 454/502 require a top end rebuild at every 250-350hrs, that's approx. $2500. 500-600hrs require bottom end, that's not cheap, so consider the hours and ask if top and bottom rebuilds where done timely. 496 is different, and a lot more stout, I think it's 800hrs for the first rebuild.

Good Luck
That is a requirement for a box stock Mercruiser 454 or 502 ? Probably the most overlooked maintenance requirement in the marine industry.
ed
Interceptor is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:47 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lk. st. Clair MI
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by brett_p
Who said it was worse? I said that 300 hours in 2 years is bad compared to 300 hours over 10 years and by bad I didn't mean that the motor is "bad" just referring to it having a lot of use in a shorter period of time. I've taken my boat out almost every weekend since I bought it in June and I still haven't put 30 hours on it yet so to me someone that puts 100+ hours in a year is a lot. That's just my opinion but opinions are like azzholes, everybody has one!
You did. Post #3 in this thread.
POWERPLAY J is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 02:52 PM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 2,142
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brett_p
Who said it was worse? I said that 300 hours in 2 years is bad compared to 300 hours over 10 years and by bad I didn't mean that the motor is "bad" just referring to it having a lot of use in a shorter period of time. I've taken my boat out almost every weekend since I bought it in June and I still haven't put 30 hours on it yet so to me someone that puts 100+ hours in a year is a lot. That's just my opinion but opinions are like azzholes, everybody has one!
I put 150+ hrs a year on my boat, as anyone who has owned boats know the more you use them the better everything stays working. The worst thing for a boat is to sit unused. In south florida we boat year round. Any stock engine outboard, I/O ect that isn't a HP model will easily run for 2000 hours if it is maintained properly. As somebody else said the hours are nearly meaningless on a used boat condition is what is important, that is especially true of an older boat running a 454MPI or 502 ect. A survey and engine inspection are the best options.

And your comment about the diesel truck is wrong also, a two year old truck with 300k miles means the thing was driven on the highway almost exclusively and will have very little wear and tear compared to a 10 year old truck with 300k miles. Like you said just my opinion.
pstorti is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:53 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

At 600 hours my main concerns would be how hard the engines were normally run and if regular maintenance was performed. If the previous owners ran the boat conservatively, and if the engines had regular maintenance performed (documented maintenance history), and the numbers on your engine survey look good, you should be fine. Otherwise, run Forest run!
SR-71 is offline  
Old 01-01-2013, 04:55 PM
  #29  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: St.Peters,Mo/5mm LOTO/LEOPA
Posts: 1,227
Received 136 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bert4332
Remember, stock bbc 454/502 require a top end rebuild at every 250-350hrs, that's approx. $2500. 500-600hrs require bottom end, that's not cheap, so consider the hours and ask if top and bottom rebuilds where done timely. 496 is different, and a lot more stout, I think it's 800hrs for the first rebuild.

Good Luck
not on a black engine maybe blue
flat rate is online now  
Old 01-01-2013, 06:19 PM
  #30  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
dirtlawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 478
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pstorti
I put 150+ hrs a year on my boat, as anyone who has owned boats know the more you use them the better everything stays working. The worst thing for a boat is to sit unused. In south florida we boat year round. Any stock engine outboard, I/O ect that isn't a HP model will easily run for 2000 hours if it is maintained properly.
I could not agree with this more - boats were meant to be used. When they sit around collecting dust things begin to deteriorate. I would not be concerned with a well used, well maintained motor. As said several times above, get a survey!
dirtlawyer is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.