Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   Custom Engine Builders (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/291525-custom-engine-builders.html)

cheech 02-20-2013 11:07 PM


Originally Posted by only1adrian (Post 3870333)
lsx with twin turbo's 6lbs of boost.
http://im1.shutterfly.com/media/47a3...D550/ry%3D400/

Nevermind, I cant get pic to post.

Anymore specs on this build?

bulletbob 02-21-2013 09:10 AM

Great informative thread. Thanks to everyone for contributing and not crapping all over one another in the process!

hogie roll 02-21-2013 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by professor_speed (Post 3868716)

Imo The LS will shine in up some 30 foot singles and Maybe up a to 38 in twins. Beyond that to make a single speed transmission set up work you really need more torque. Two speed marine transmissions are too rpm limited cause they were designed around diesels, Now if you turbo them, I think you can stick with a bbc to 1200 hp. (1000hp is probably more realistic though) Past that You are going to need an aftermarket LS block and 6 bolt heads other wise, you will lift the heads in a boat environment, And the turbos are going to get too big to bring in boost fast enough to make the torque down low that's needed(you can get away with more for short

I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.

professor_speed 02-21-2013 01:31 PM

Yes a glide can be set up direct drive and the parts are off shelf stock car stuff, also it can be built as a shorty and would be about the same length as a BW72c but, there are no decent ratios. first gear is too low, reverse is two low as well. LS four bolts will hold fine up to an easy 800hp. There are ways to go way further than that if needed. studs Help, some aftermarket head castings are thicker which is really the problem. (All the GM castings are thin)

only1adrian 02-21-2013 01:36 PM


Originally Posted by korvetkeith (Post 3872117)
I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.

Its not a problem with the Real LSX brand block However they are pricey!!

only1adrian 02-21-2013 01:53 PM


Originally Posted by cheech (Post 3871879)
Anymore specs on this build?

I will see if I can find the build sheet around here and let you know.

Bromaguire 02-21-2013 03:55 PM


Originally Posted by korvetkeith (Post 3872117)
I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.

I was running around 14psi through a whipple blower on my totally stock LQ4 for around 30-40k miles with zero problems before changed my setup. I've seen plenty of FI setups on the LS motors and haven't heard of any real head lifting problems.

My current engine with the actual "LSX" block has additional head bolts and extra cooling features.

only1adrian 02-21-2013 08:19 PM


Originally Posted by Bromaguire (Post 3872206)
I was running around 14psi through a whipple blower on my totally stock LQ4 for around 30-40k miles with zero problems before changed my setup. I've seen plenty of FI setups on the LS motors and haven't heard of any real head lifting problems.

My current engine with the actual "LSX" block has additional head bolts and extra cooling features.

This was part of testing with this motor, We actually detuned the motor to only about 930hp due to the heads lifting. It is a big problem, but again, if your gonna spend that money, might as well get the LSX block.

Bromaguire 02-21-2013 08:28 PM


Originally Posted by only1adrian (Post 3872407)
This was part of testing with this motor, We actually detuned the motor to only about 930hp due to the heads lifting. It is a big problem, but again, if your gonna spend that money, might as well get the LSX block.

Ok, I wasn't running 1000hp on my completely stock motor but closer to 650-700hp and there were zero problems. I'd agree if you plan on going for anywhere near 1000hp an LSX block is a better choice, although there are people pushing the non-LSX block that far.

This quad turbo motor built by my engine builder was making over 1600hp at 6psi and had no head lift problems with the LSX block.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u...gy/engine1.jpg
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u...gy/engine3.jpg
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u...gy/engine2.jpg

only1adrian 02-21-2013 09:04 PM

Thats some nice Hardware!!!!



http://www.shutterfly.com/lightbox/v...cd1d30d33b21f1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.