Notices
General Boating Discussion

Custom Engine Builders

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-20-2013 | 11:07 PM
  #71  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 565
Default

Originally Posted by only1adrian
lsx with twin turbo's 6lbs of boost.


Nevermind, I cant get pic to post.
Anymore specs on this build?
cheech is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 09:10 AM
  #72  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 81
From: Columbia S.C.
Default

Great informative thread. Thanks to everyone for contributing and not crapping all over one another in the process!
bulletbob is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 12:59 PM
  #73  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 794
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by professor_speed

Imo The LS will shine in up some 30 foot singles and Maybe up a to 38 in twins. Beyond that to make a single speed transmission set up work you really need more torque. Two speed marine transmissions are too rpm limited cause they were designed around diesels, Now if you turbo them, I think you can stick with a bbc to 1200 hp. (1000hp is probably more realistic though) Past that You are going to need an aftermarket LS block and 6 bolt heads other wise, you will lift the heads in a boat environment, And the turbos are going to get too big to bring in boost fast enough to make the torque down low that's needed(you can get away with more for short
I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 01:31 PM
  #74  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 659
Likes: 3
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default

Yes a glide can be set up direct drive and the parts are off shelf stock car stuff, also it can be built as a shorty and would be about the same length as a BW72c but, there are no decent ratios. first gear is too low, reverse is two low as well. LS four bolts will hold fine up to an easy 800hp. There are ways to go way further than that if needed. studs Help, some aftermarket head castings are thicker which is really the problem. (All the GM castings are thin)
professor_speed is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 01:36 PM
  #75  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: St clair Shores Mi
Default

Originally Posted by korvetkeith
I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.
Its not a problem with the Real LSX brand block However they are pricey!!
only1adrian is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 01:53 PM
  #76  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: St clair Shores Mi
Default

Originally Posted by cheech
Anymore specs on this build?
I will see if I can find the build sheet around here and let you know.
only1adrian is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 03:55 PM
  #77  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by korvetkeith
I've been contemplating this transmission idea. I wonder if it be possible to repurpose a powerglide and remove the TC to make it direct.

I don't generally like the idea of forced induction LSX's due to their lack of head bolts, but maybe that theory has been debunked.
I was running around 14psi through a whipple blower on my totally stock LQ4 for around 30-40k miles with zero problems before changed my setup. I've seen plenty of FI setups on the LS motors and haven't heard of any real head lifting problems.

My current engine with the actual "LSX" block has additional head bolts and extra cooling features.
Bromaguire is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 08:19 PM
  #78  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: St clair Shores Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Bromaguire
I was running around 14psi through a whipple blower on my totally stock LQ4 for around 30-40k miles with zero problems before changed my setup. I've seen plenty of FI setups on the LS motors and haven't heard of any real head lifting problems.

My current engine with the actual "LSX" block has additional head bolts and extra cooling features.
This was part of testing with this motor, We actually detuned the motor to only about 930hp due to the heads lifting. It is a big problem, but again, if your gonna spend that money, might as well get the LSX block.
only1adrian is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 08:28 PM
  #79  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by only1adrian
This was part of testing with this motor, We actually detuned the motor to only about 930hp due to the heads lifting. It is a big problem, but again, if your gonna spend that money, might as well get the LSX block.
Ok, I wasn't running 1000hp on my completely stock motor but closer to 650-700hp and there were zero problems. I'd agree if you plan on going for anywhere near 1000hp an LSX block is a better choice, although there are people pushing the non-LSX block that far.

This quad turbo motor built by my engine builder was making over 1600hp at 6psi and had no head lift problems with the LSX block.



Last edited by Bromaguire; 02-21-2013 at 08:36 PM.
Bromaguire is offline  
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 09:04 PM
  #80  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: St clair Shores Mi
Default

Thats some nice Hardware!!!!



http://www.shutterfly.com/lightbox/v...cd1d30d33b21f1

Last edited by only1adrian; 02-21-2013 at 09:09 PM.
only1adrian is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.