Outboard help??
#52
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: QLD
I'd prefer tabs than ballast, both is even better. I have both, started with just 200L of ballast up front. After a season I got dana hp1100 tabs, man did it make a difference. The tabs work quick so you can change things at the drop of a hat, the ballast obviously takes a minute or so to fill and empty. I still like to throw a little ballast in if its the sort of water where you can run fast with trim but the boat is getting unsettled on some smaller waves.
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better.
It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal?
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better.
It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal?
#53
actual it looks like a 25" engine. Although it will put the center of gravity higher you can mount a hydraulic jack plate on it and it would help the powerhead/transom clearance when it is in trailer trim. My 22 velocity had a 225 excel yamaha(more like a true 175 hp) on it and was able to spin a 23 raker prop for 64 mph. without triming the jack plate it would run 55 mph. http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/boa/3618694826.html
#54
I'd prefer tabs than ballast, both is even better. I have both, started with just 200L of ballast up front. After a season I got dana hp1100 tabs, man did it make a difference. The tabs work quick so you can change things at the drop of a hat, the ballast obviously takes a minute or so to fill and empty. I still like to throw a little ballast in if its the sort of water where you can run fast with trim but the boat is getting unsettled on some smaller waves.
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better.
It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal?
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better.
It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal?
#55
actual it looks like a 25" engine. Although it will put the center of gravity higher you can mount a hydraulic jack plate on it and it would help the powerhead/transom clearance when it is in trailer trim. My 22 velocity had a 225 excel yamaha(more like a true 175 hp) on it and was able to spin a 23 raker prop for 64 mph. without triming the jack plate it would run 55 mph. http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/boa/3618694826.html
#58
Cant click on your pic to blow it up, but it looks about the same distance from the lower mount to the cav plate as his. My guess is 25". If he is gonna run 10" setback, he may even want to go 20". Only problem with that is it actually will lower the powerhead, and give him more trouble with his trim issue.
#59
Cant click on your pic to blow it up, but it looks about the same distance from the lower mount to the cav plate as his. My guess is 25". If he is gonna run 10" setback, he may even want to go 20". Only problem with that is it actually will lower the powerhead, and give him more trouble with his trim issue.
#60
Sorry about the pic. Not sure what happened there. Kevin used to build all of the 22's with a small splash well like mine has. But this required a 25" mid-section so the cowl didn't hit when you trailered the motor up. He will make them now with a cut down transom that allows for the use of a 20" mid. Of course if you run enough setback, the cowl won't hit anything anyway.




