Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Poker Run Format - should it be changed? >

Poker Run Format - should it be changed?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Poker Run Format - should it be changed?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-10-2013 | 12:43 PM
  #221  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: Wyandotte, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Cat & Mice
There are a lot of variables that can create different scenarios when crossing a roost. , Speed, Trim, size of roost, etc...

I had a personal experience that is relevant.

Desert storm i think 2002-03. I was in my 145mph 28 Daytona starting the PR. the fleet took off and I was right next to a large red Skater. I was right next to the guy on his left (we were still accelerating) doing about 115-120mph and my right engine hit rev limiter and shut down. I was still trimmed too high for acceleration and didn't trim down early enough once at speed (rookie move). My boat immediately turned right directly towards the Skater. He looked over and saw me. I was doing everything i could get get the engine re fired and hold the wheel but I ended up going right behind him and took the roost right in the face (no canopies or windshield) It hurt bad. Because I had lost power and momentum I was not going to blow over, plus I had a center pod which helped LOL. If that same thing happened at 130+ it would have been a much different deal. At that time I had no idea about running up a roost and blowing over. I had my family on the boat with me like it was a sunday cruise, So stupid... My wife will not ride in a PR again.

Accidents happen but they happen more often to people that do not have experience and training.

MP
Thank you for this first hand experience post. THis is what I am trying (and others) to get at. Lets say this mechanical difficulty you experienced had happened while traveling within feet of spectator boats? You most likely would have hurt someone seriously... I am now way saying you would ever drive this close to spectator boats.. It sounds like your experience has tought you a valuable driving leason. You also have been humbled enought to admit yourmistake and learn from it, which is great!. I am just using your experience to prove my point. Had an engine shut down, a hyd failure or any number of things happened on the PP Skater while it was that close to spectator boats it would have been catestrophic... Or maybe even someone was swimming or sitting on a raft....

Last edited by low_psi; 09-10-2013 at 12:45 PM.
low_psi is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 12:59 PM
  #222  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 752
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Default

Also, Poker Runs are not sport. Sport requires competition. Driving around a lake collecting cards is not sport. It may be fast and colorful and exciting and fun but it is not sport. SBI, OSS, OPA racing is sport when you're competing against someone in a race.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:01 PM
  #223  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZZ60jrw6cg
Tcraft is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:02 PM
  #224  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cat & Mice
trying to improve the performance of the boat will only make drivers go faster to get to the limits.

If a Ferrari can't make a corner and crashes does that mean we need better tire technology to create better grip? maybe better suspensions? No these will not help, the driver of the Ferrari was going to fast for the conditions of equipment and terrain, period. If the car was made better to have not crashed on that day then the next time the guy came thru the corner he would be going that much faster and still crash because he is driving beyond the conditions.

This is not a boat technology problem this is a knowledge, attitude, preparation, and safety gear problem.

Its like F1 racing, they have for years trying to slow the cars down so they don't get killed when something goes wrong.

We will not solve the problem making boats safer at higher speeds.

MP
and yet for some reason millions of dollars and even billions of dollars is spent on tire technology in the form of rummer compounds, tread patterns, sidewall structure, build structure of the tire, belting materials

and millions if not billions of dollars is spent on suspensions (like active suspensions), geometry of suspensions, weight of components and materials used

anti-lock breaks, active wings, air bags

so really what your solution sounds like is accept that boats will not place money into technology or technological advancement, slow them down, but a big orange life preserver on everyone and a canopy and just go out there and do flip after flip

because F! and others put no money into improving technology until the speeds that could be raced at for the majority of laps got to the point where any crash was going to be catastrophic before they decided to dial back the speeds because they were getting speeds that were getting beyond catastrophic

well boats are pretty much there now between flipping and stuffing and even with canopies there have been deaths so it is either put on another orange life preserver for more cushion in that flip or perhaps think about trying to reduce the incidents of flipping and with an active control surface I would believe you could also reduce the incidents of stuffing as well by keeping the bow level to the water VS letting it get nose down

unfortunately because of a weak sanctioning body or bodies ad because of unsanctioned "races" high performance boats have been allowed to just add more power with only moderate improvements in overall safety especially when it comes to limiting/avoiding crashes VS the idea that "we might survive it with a spare air strapped to my big orange life vest and a canopy"

safety and speed have always gone hand and hand in sanctioned racing and that includes technological advances to limit the need for crash survival not just advancements in surviving crashes.....otherwise Indy cars would still be like they were in the 1930s only with a big roll cage all around them and 800hp running on 4 little thin tires that have to be changed every 2 laps
TexasVines is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:11 PM
  #225  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 1,072
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
Secondly the reason as you guys say to not let off is by letting off he wouldn't have as great as control, especially from those speeds. Sometime you have to power out/through of a dangerous situation, cant just hit the brakes all the time.
At 8:30 in this vid the driver of this boat comes off plane pretty darn fast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL0GrnnNwhE
Indy is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:12 PM
  #226  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Kelly O
This is my take :
When I go to take part in a Poker Run, it is because I want to run together with similar-level performance boats.
I know we are on public waterways and that will cause all of us entered in the event to be required to take the safety of the general public into foremost consideration.
I also know that at some point I need my fellow poker runners to take my safety into consideration as well.
Therefore, if my fellow runners and I encounter say, a boat in the middle of the course, I expect all guys running near me to lift off the throttle while maintaining control of their boat. Especially when big power and roostertails are involved- boats coming behind see the tails drop down and they know to slow down themselves or take other precaution, this can be noticed from miles behind as a signal to slow down.
Should I need to take serious evasive action, at least I would not have the additional danger of the roost to contend with.

In the accident which spurred this most-current debate, I keep wishing that the boat that made it past (the obstacle of the boat 'in the way') had been more aware of other poker runners around them.

Recognize the dangers not only to yourself but to all others running with you. i.e.: spectator boat entering intended path
Take actions to preserve your safety but also help others to preserve their own safety. i.e.: lift out of the throttle
Give 'your friends' some room to help them avoid an accident, while giving yourself an escape route also. i.e.: change your path if possible to give others room to avoid oncoming danger, even though you may be able to make it past yourself without a path change.

Back to the most recent tragedy, I just wish both boats had lifted off the throttles enough so that dealing with the effects of the roostertail would have been avoided. I can't help but believe it would have made a difference.
Great post.....But it is tough to help your fellow boater out or help him have an escape route when all your thinking about, while in front, is ribbing him that you have beat him to the card stop. Here lies the MOST BASIC problem. IT IS NOT A RACE. I know I have caught myself getting caught up in the moment just like I would think most of us have. Until we solve this problem, or mindset, we are on a fast path to self destructing our sport. All I can control is what I do. I don't have a boat that runs as fast as others but it does run fast enough to get me in trouble if I'm not on m y game. You guys with the ultra fast stuff have got to take a good look at where we are headed. I know I am with what I have got. And this pretty much goes across the board if we are running sport boats.
682gold is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:14 PM
  #227  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 1,072
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Originally Posted by CLA
but IMO at 150mph plus there is no time to do anything.
Ok then...this begs the question; Is this this type of activity on an open course safe?
Indy is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #228  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 1,072
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Originally Posted by jmoore1225
All you guys running your mouth about how stupid or moronic these guys are were not there, your not seeing what they seen for them to choose those lines.

Then they're free to post the vids, I'm sure every one of these boats is equipped with Go-Pro. Then that should put an end to the speculation right?
Indy is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #229  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 666
Likes: 16
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Originally Posted by boatme
Holy crap!! did i see this correctly?? did they split the boat with the camera and the nblue boat in front of them ?????? Please say that isnt true
Man am i glad i only go to two events every year... that was stupid. Almost impossible for me to believe they would do that...

I love boating alone on the great lakes... none of this s**t to deal with.

Tom
Tborisch is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 01:23 PM
  #230  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
Even the unlimited hydroplanes use manual controls for their canard There a lot involved with computer controlled flight surfaces then the cost of the black box.
"The canard allows the driver to more easily “fly” the boat, pushing the rear of the canard down to create lift and raise the nose of the boat, or raising it to lower the nose of the boat if it gets too high and is in danger of “blowing over”. The driver will also manipulate the canard in the turns or when rough water and windy conditions persist."

and here is one on a 1/8th scale hydroplane

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WhFfBQSw9w

here is the person that built it talking about it

http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...p/t-19596.html

the reason they are not computer controlled on RACING is because they are RACING and they want the human factor involved and it is a simple fact that a computer can make a decision faster than a human can in instances of flying and the like because if a human without the aid of a computer tried to fly the stealth bomber it would crash and it is only with the aid of a computer that it flies

and again we are talking about a safety feature to try and prevent a catastrophic event not something that is there to get 1 more MPH or 5 more MPH out of a hull or horsepower and we are talking about what should be considered non-race boats not race boats on a closed course with a professional driver surrounded by other professional drivers that know they will kill someone if they cut them off and send their rooster tail up the tunnel

would it be 100% fail safe no nothing is, but the technology is out there and the vast majority of components are on the shelf already it is the modeling of the hulls and the aerodynamics of the hull and when that critical point is that needs to be studied

if you watch boats (or anything else) flip it always starts very slowly with a slow liftoff and everyone in the crowd thinks "is it going over" and then very rapidly it has pretty much gone over......implementing a system that reacts in that "is it going to go over period" would greatly reduce the number of times it does go over.....again look at NASCAR all they put in place is what looks like a deck hatch on a boat that pops up.....it is not for speed, it is not for aerodynamics, it is not for improved handling it is for one thing and one thing only to prevent flips
TexasVines is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.