Poker Run Format - should it be changed?
#221
Registered
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: Wyandotte, MI
There are a lot of variables that can create different scenarios when crossing a roost. , Speed, Trim, size of roost, etc...
I had a personal experience that is relevant.
Desert storm i think 2002-03. I was in my 145mph 28 Daytona starting the PR. the fleet took off and I was right next to a large red Skater. I was right next to the guy on his left (we were still accelerating) doing about 115-120mph and my right engine hit rev limiter and shut down. I was still trimmed too high for acceleration and didn't trim down early enough once at speed (rookie move). My boat immediately turned right directly towards the Skater. He looked over and saw me. I was doing everything i could get get the engine re fired and hold the wheel but I ended up going right behind him and took the roost right in the face (no canopies or windshield) It hurt bad. Because I had lost power and momentum I was not going to blow over, plus I had a center pod which helped LOL. If that same thing happened at 130+ it would have been a much different deal. At that time I had no idea about running up a roost and blowing over. I had my family on the boat with me like it was a sunday cruise, So stupid... My wife will not ride in a PR again.
Accidents happen but they happen more often to people that do not have experience and training.
MP
I had a personal experience that is relevant.
Desert storm i think 2002-03. I was in my 145mph 28 Daytona starting the PR. the fleet took off and I was right next to a large red Skater. I was right next to the guy on his left (we were still accelerating) doing about 115-120mph and my right engine hit rev limiter and shut down. I was still trimmed too high for acceleration and didn't trim down early enough once at speed (rookie move). My boat immediately turned right directly towards the Skater. He looked over and saw me. I was doing everything i could get get the engine re fired and hold the wheel but I ended up going right behind him and took the roost right in the face (no canopies or windshield) It hurt bad. Because I had lost power and momentum I was not going to blow over, plus I had a center pod which helped LOL. If that same thing happened at 130+ it would have been a much different deal. At that time I had no idea about running up a roost and blowing over. I had my family on the boat with me like it was a sunday cruise, So stupid... My wife will not ride in a PR again.
Accidents happen but they happen more often to people that do not have experience and training.
MP
Last edited by low_psi; 09-10-2013 at 12:45 PM.
#222
Registered

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 752
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Also, Poker Runs are not sport. Sport requires competition. Driving around a lake collecting cards is not sport. It may be fast and colorful and exciting and fun but it is not sport. SBI, OSS, OPA racing is sport when you're competing against someone in a race.
#224
Registered
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
trying to improve the performance of the boat will only make drivers go faster to get to the limits.
If a Ferrari can't make a corner and crashes does that mean we need better tire technology to create better grip? maybe better suspensions? No these will not help, the driver of the Ferrari was going to fast for the conditions of equipment and terrain, period. If the car was made better to have not crashed on that day then the next time the guy came thru the corner he would be going that much faster and still crash because he is driving beyond the conditions.
This is not a boat technology problem this is a knowledge, attitude, preparation, and safety gear problem.
Its like F1 racing, they have for years trying to slow the cars down so they don't get killed when something goes wrong.
We will not solve the problem making boats safer at higher speeds.
MP
If a Ferrari can't make a corner and crashes does that mean we need better tire technology to create better grip? maybe better suspensions? No these will not help, the driver of the Ferrari was going to fast for the conditions of equipment and terrain, period. If the car was made better to have not crashed on that day then the next time the guy came thru the corner he would be going that much faster and still crash because he is driving beyond the conditions.
This is not a boat technology problem this is a knowledge, attitude, preparation, and safety gear problem.
Its like F1 racing, they have for years trying to slow the cars down so they don't get killed when something goes wrong.
We will not solve the problem making boats safer at higher speeds.
MP
and millions if not billions of dollars is spent on suspensions (like active suspensions), geometry of suspensions, weight of components and materials used
anti-lock breaks, active wings, air bags
so really what your solution sounds like is accept that boats will not place money into technology or technological advancement, slow them down, but a big orange life preserver on everyone and a canopy and just go out there and do flip after flip
because F! and others put no money into improving technology until the speeds that could be raced at for the majority of laps got to the point where any crash was going to be catastrophic before they decided to dial back the speeds because they were getting speeds that were getting beyond catastrophic
well boats are pretty much there now between flipping and stuffing and even with canopies there have been deaths so it is either put on another orange life preserver for more cushion in that flip or perhaps think about trying to reduce the incidents of flipping and with an active control surface I would believe you could also reduce the incidents of stuffing as well by keeping the bow level to the water VS letting it get nose down
unfortunately because of a weak sanctioning body or bodies ad because of unsanctioned "races" high performance boats have been allowed to just add more power with only moderate improvements in overall safety especially when it comes to limiting/avoiding crashes VS the idea that "we might survive it with a spare air strapped to my big orange life vest and a canopy"
safety and speed have always gone hand and hand in sanctioned racing and that includes technological advances to limit the need for crash survival not just advancements in surviving crashes.....otherwise Indy cars would still be like they were in the 1930s only with a big roll cage all around them and 800hp running on 4 little thin tires that have to be changed every 2 laps
#225
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL0GrnnNwhE
#226
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
This is my take :
When I go to take part in a Poker Run, it is because I want to run together with similar-level performance boats.
I know we are on public waterways and that will cause all of us entered in the event to be required to take the safety of the general public into foremost consideration.
I also know that at some point I need my fellow poker runners to take my safety into consideration as well.
Therefore, if my fellow runners and I encounter say, a boat in the middle of the course, I expect all guys running near me to lift off the throttle while maintaining control of their boat. Especially when big power and roostertails are involved- boats coming behind see the tails drop down and they know to slow down themselves or take other precaution, this can be noticed from miles behind as a signal to slow down.
Should I need to take serious evasive action, at least I would not have the additional danger of the roost to contend with.
In the accident which spurred this most-current debate, I keep wishing that the boat that made it past (the obstacle of the boat 'in the way') had been more aware of other poker runners around them.
Recognize the dangers not only to yourself but to all others running with you. i.e.: spectator boat entering intended path
Take actions to preserve your safety but also help others to preserve their own safety. i.e.: lift out of the throttle
Give 'your friends' some room to help them avoid an accident, while giving yourself an escape route also. i.e.: change your path if possible to give others room to avoid oncoming danger, even though you may be able to make it past yourself without a path change.
Back to the most recent tragedy, I just wish both boats had lifted off the throttles enough so that dealing with the effects of the roostertail would have been avoided. I can't help but believe it would have made a difference.
When I go to take part in a Poker Run, it is because I want to run together with similar-level performance boats.
I know we are on public waterways and that will cause all of us entered in the event to be required to take the safety of the general public into foremost consideration.
I also know that at some point I need my fellow poker runners to take my safety into consideration as well.
Therefore, if my fellow runners and I encounter say, a boat in the middle of the course, I expect all guys running near me to lift off the throttle while maintaining control of their boat. Especially when big power and roostertails are involved- boats coming behind see the tails drop down and they know to slow down themselves or take other precaution, this can be noticed from miles behind as a signal to slow down.
Should I need to take serious evasive action, at least I would not have the additional danger of the roost to contend with.
In the accident which spurred this most-current debate, I keep wishing that the boat that made it past (the obstacle of the boat 'in the way') had been more aware of other poker runners around them.
Recognize the dangers not only to yourself but to all others running with you. i.e.: spectator boat entering intended path
Take actions to preserve your safety but also help others to preserve their own safety. i.e.: lift out of the throttle
Give 'your friends' some room to help them avoid an accident, while giving yourself an escape route also. i.e.: change your path if possible to give others room to avoid oncoming danger, even though you may be able to make it past yourself without a path change.
Back to the most recent tragedy, I just wish both boats had lifted off the throttles enough so that dealing with the effects of the roostertail would have been avoided. I can't help but believe it would have made a difference.
#228
Then they're free to post the vids, I'm sure every one of these boats is equipped with Go-Pro. Then that should put an end to the speculation right?
#229
Registered

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 666
Likes: 16
From: Grand Rapids, MI
I love boating alone on the great lakes... none of this s**t to deal with.
Tom
#230
Registered
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Even the unlimited hydroplanes use manual controls for their canard There a lot involved with computer controlled flight surfaces then the cost of the black box.
"The canard allows the driver to more easily “fly” the boat, pushing the rear of the canard down to create lift and raise the nose of the boat, or raising it to lower the nose of the boat if it gets too high and is in danger of “blowing over”. The driver will also manipulate the canard in the turns or when rough water and windy conditions persist."
"The canard allows the driver to more easily “fly” the boat, pushing the rear of the canard down to create lift and raise the nose of the boat, or raising it to lower the nose of the boat if it gets too high and is in danger of “blowing over”. The driver will also manipulate the canard in the turns or when rough water and windy conditions persist."
and here is one on a 1/8th scale hydroplane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WhFfBQSw9w
here is the person that built it talking about it
http://forums.offshoreelectrics.com/...p/t-19596.html
the reason they are not computer controlled on RACING is because they are RACING and they want the human factor involved and it is a simple fact that a computer can make a decision faster than a human can in instances of flying and the like because if a human without the aid of a computer tried to fly the stealth bomber it would crash and it is only with the aid of a computer that it flies
and again we are talking about a safety feature to try and prevent a catastrophic event not something that is there to get 1 more MPH or 5 more MPH out of a hull or horsepower and we are talking about what should be considered non-race boats not race boats on a closed course with a professional driver surrounded by other professional drivers that know they will kill someone if they cut them off and send their rooster tail up the tunnel
would it be 100% fail safe no nothing is, but the technology is out there and the vast majority of components are on the shelf already it is the modeling of the hulls and the aerodynamics of the hull and when that critical point is that needs to be studied
if you watch boats (or anything else) flip it always starts very slowly with a slow liftoff and everyone in the crowd thinks "is it going over" and then very rapidly it has pretty much gone over......implementing a system that reacts in that "is it going to go over period" would greatly reduce the number of times it does go over.....again look at NASCAR all they put in place is what looks like a deck hatch on a boat that pops up.....it is not for speed, it is not for aerodynamics, it is not for improved handling it is for one thing and one thing only to prevent flips



