Mercury 8.2 MAG vs 8.2 MAG H.O. opinions
09-13-2013, 10:47 AM
#11
Registered
I know this is a little different, but last year I had my twin 496 Mag motors "converted" to HOs via a cam and PCM change. Prior to the conversion, I could expect low 70s with 74 being the best WOT. After, I can get slightly over 80. My boat is a Advantage 32 Victory and I'm running Bravo 1s with Bravo 4 blade 28 pitch props. Of course, my "upgrade" didn't cost $11K, more like $6K so I would say, yes it was worth it! Good luck!
09-13-2013, 12:09 PM
#13
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
I don't know the specific differences between the regular Mag and Mag HO, but I would guess that its the cam and tune only.
IMO, I would go with the HO's. Although they cost more, you get the benefit of more hp and they will add value whenever you might want to sell.
IMO, I would go with the HO's. Although they cost more, you get the benefit of more hp and they will add value whenever you might want to sell.
09-13-2013, 12:48 PM
#14
Registered
+1, especially when you consider the $11k difference in the overall cost of a 310 FX. They are great looking all purpose boats for sure!
09-13-2013, 01:26 PM
#15
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
The Volvo Penta 430's are out now:
Volvo Penta 430 page.
Can't wait for a comparison test. Given the history of most of the LS-based engines introduced so far, I would expect that fuel economy numbers would be far better for the VP's.
Volvo Penta 430 page.
Can't wait for a comparison test. Given the history of most of the LS-based engines introduced so far, I would expect that fuel economy numbers would be far better for the VP's.
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
Retired! Boating full-time now.
