Carbs vs FI... Pros/cons
#31
Agree. Mike Tkach on here has a pair of 588s with 8.3L whipples, and a pair of 1050 quick fuel carbs. They make 1200HP, and idle at 650 in gear. The bypass valve in the whipple is nice.
One nice thing about EFI though, it can be a big help for some of the guys running radical cams, combined with 18'' six blade props. A lot of times in order to get a carb'd setup not to fall on its face when shifted with big props, you really need to give them a lot of fuel and air. Which then becomes a problem of a fast neutral idle speed, or a rolling idle(surging), in order for them not to stall. Some builders have fought this problem, by adding shift solenoids, so that the throttle lever will be bumped up when put into gear. This eliminates that 1200RPM Nuetral, 700 in gear scenario when setup right. With EFI, the controller can take care of that.
One nice thing about EFI though, it can be a big help for some of the guys running radical cams, combined with 18'' six blade props. A lot of times in order to get a carb'd setup not to fall on its face when shifted with big props, you really need to give them a lot of fuel and air. Which then becomes a problem of a fast neutral idle speed, or a rolling idle(surging), in order for them not to stall. Some builders have fought this problem, by adding shift solenoids, so that the throttle lever will be bumped up when put into gear. This eliminates that 1200RPM Nuetral, 700 in gear scenario when setup right. With EFI, the controller can take care of that.
#32
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Aside from being able to adjust and optimize your fuel curve for every load and rpm point, the biggest benefit to using a good efi system is that it manages the whole engine. You can program it to monitor every conceivable sensor and engine condition, and then tell it what you want it to do when a parameter is out of range; pull timing, reduce rpm, add fuel, etc. Total engine control, built in wide band control and monitoring, guardian system, knock protection, built in data logging, etc. really make the extra cost up front worth it. A good efi system is far more reliable then any carburetor, and will last much longer. Also, if you value your time, tuning an efi engine's fuel curve takes a fraction of the time it takes to dial in a carburetor throughout the whole rpm range.
#33
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Aside from being able to adjust and optimize your fuel curve for every load and rpm point, the biggest benefit to using a good efi system is that it manages the whole engine. You can program it to monitor every conceivable sensor and engine condition, and then tell it what you want it to do when a parameter is out of range; pull timing, reduce rpm, add fuel, etc. Total engine control, built in wide band control and monitoring, guardian system, knock protection, built in data logging, etc. really make the extra cost up front worth it. A good efi system is far more reliable then any carburetor, and will last much longer. Also, if you value your time, tuning an efi engine's fuel curve takes a fraction of the time it takes to dial in a carburetor throughout the whole rpm range.
I wanna say a while back I priced out a EFI system for a blown roots setup, and it was around 5k per engine? Does that sound in the ballpark?
#34
Registered

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 930
From: LBC, OH
I personally run an EGT gauge, sometimes I take a peak at it....
#35
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
I can attest to that. Dialing the fuel curve in on a carb setup IN the boat, is time consuming. There's more to it then just jet sizes. esp with twin carbs on twin engines.
I wanna say a while back I priced out a EFI system for a blown roots setup, and it was around 5k per engine? Does that sound in the ballpark?
I wanna say a while back I priced out a EFI system for a blown roots setup, and it was around 5k per engine? Does that sound in the ballpark?
Or you could go with two throttle body injection units for a bit cheaper if you just want a bolt on option.
#36
Registered
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
as stated before... The ONLY reason for a carb setup is the cost and/or the lack of knowledge by the owner or builder of an EFI setup. You don't see a carb on anything from Mercury. You also can't go to any car lot anywhere and find a carburetor of any kind. Technology is better if you have the knowledge to install and tune.
#37
Yes there are some builders out there that can dial in a carb. It is also true that just about anyone can dial in an EFI closed loop system with a laptop if in fact it does not tune itself.
#38
Registered
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 160
From: central IL
I've had both Carbs and EFI. Both have their plus's and minus's.
I've had carb engines flood the fuel bowls when lauching the bow high and pulling back on the sticks.
I've had some minor vapor lock issues with my MPI's in exteme hot humid weather.
I thought most of the marine EFI set ups used fixed curves for fuel mapping and do not self adjust because of the lack of O2 sensors????
I've had carb engines flood the fuel bowls when lauching the bow high and pulling back on the sticks.
I've had some minor vapor lock issues with my MPI's in exteme hot humid weather.
I thought most of the marine EFI set ups used fixed curves for fuel mapping and do not self adjust because of the lack of O2 sensors????
Take cost out the equation and the choice becomes clear. EFI wins everytime the only reason for carbs is cost plain and simple.(or rules if you are racing in class, but again thats to control cost) New EFI systems, like Holley, Fast ect. are not hard to use, they just cost more.
My experience with those older TBI style setups, Holley or FASS, you could give it to me and I'd probably still trade for a good carb...
However one can easily hit the local bone yard and scavenge everything ya need to convert any marine engine to modern EFI for a little bit of nothing. With all the aftermarket ECM tuning options available today, I'd opt to build my own setups. Browse one of the LS forums and you'll find everything ya wanted to know about swaps. Big cams, blowers, turbos, all purr like a kitten when topped with modern fuel injection..
However one can easily hit the local bone yard and scavenge everything ya need to convert any marine engine to modern EFI for a little bit of nothing. With all the aftermarket ECM tuning options available today, I'd opt to build my own setups. Browse one of the LS forums and you'll find everything ya wanted to know about swaps. Big cams, blowers, turbos, all purr like a kitten when topped with modern fuel injection..
#39
Registered
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 160
From: central IL
As far as the original posters question, it's very easy to answer what the general boating community think is superior in the carb vs FI debate...
Look at prices for used 700SCI's and 1075SCI's versus used 700hp and 1100hp aftermarket carb's blower motors. You'll immediately notice which demand a higher resale value.
Look at prices for used 700SCI's and 1075SCI's versus used 700hp and 1100hp aftermarket carb's blower motors. You'll immediately notice which demand a higher resale value.
#40
Registered

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 980
Likes: 24
From: Midwest, LOTO, Miami Beach
Ok,
If I want to convert my Sterling carbureted 1100s (that ran flawlessly last summer, never lurched or died around the docks, and started every time I hit ignition) to EFI, what would I need to do?
They are currently at Native getting rebuilt and the boat is at Nauti Marine so now would be a good time if is truly worth it.
If I want to convert my Sterling carbureted 1100s (that ran flawlessly last summer, never lurched or died around the docks, and started every time I hit ignition) to EFI, what would I need to do?
They are currently at Native getting rebuilt and the boat is at Nauti Marine so now would be a good time if is truly worth it.


