Notices

Gear ratio 1:5:1 vs 1:36

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-29-2014, 06:26 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Osage Beach, MO
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Sitting on a lift year round, is there any wear difference lol
QWKRN U is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 06:33 PM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QWKRN U
Sitting on a lift year round, is there any wear difference lol
Lol! There's a Dust difference WR!!
Unlimited39 is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Osage Beach, MO
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unlimited39
Lol! There's a Dust difference WR!!
QWKRN U is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 07:34 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

It's just math as whether the 1:36 or 1:50 is better for longevity & dependability HP = RPM x T / 5252. As I raise the RPM of the output shaft on the drive the torque goes down. Since the shaft dia and bearing are all equal in size there is less load on it now, higher RPM will increase wear as every bearing has X number of revolutions in it, you now reach that number sooner for the same hours of running. That's the theory and math.

With the diesels we always ran very high shaft rpm's and smaller props. Many of the diesel boats you see people trying to go fast with today have prop issues, they break blades. It was amazing how compared to today props the props of yesteryear were junk yet could run Cowes Torquay Cowes at 100mph and not loose a blade?

I'm just a big fan of smaller and faster than bigger and slower?
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 05:37 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With the 1.36 gear there is more surface material compared to the 1.50 making it stronger. Before xr drives were introduced the 1.36 gear was used in big hp applications and more often with Blower motors. This was also seen in the alpha generation as well. With bravo failures all around us and with the cost of new drives continally rising I would think most want every angle they can get. Heat and tourgue kills bravo drives. More rpm and less pitch hooked up to drive gauges will steer you in the right direction.
BLUEMAGIC is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 09:15 AM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Appreciate the responses!!!
Unlimited39 is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 10:01 AM
  #17  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 2,639
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Probably not worth the money unless you run out of prop pitch options. Although bblades has mentioned that the 34 bravo is a different animal (whatever that means?) and does not perform as well as the 32. It is my opinion that in a high x dimention situation (single engine) that high gear and lower prop pitch can reduce crabbing...i have no data on this.
JRider is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 10:31 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JRider
Probably not worth the money unless you run out of prop pitch options. Although bblades has mentioned that the 34 bravo is a different animal (whatever that means?) and does not perform as well as the 32. It is my opinion that in a high x dimention situation (single engine) that high gear and lower prop pitch can reduce crabbing...i have no data on this.
Depends on the situation. Here is my take on this. Big gears and little props is for top end. Just look at the ouotboards. Less prop diameter size etc is less drag. Less out of the whole and mid range. Bigger props are the oposite with less top end but everywhere else is better. As far as durabilty. I would say less pitch is better. Plus lots of blades. 4 blade bravo 34's vibrate like crazy on my high x fountain. 5 and 6 blades are smoother and keep the vibration out of the gears making the gears last longer. I know I got side tracked..

Last edited by mcprodesign; 05-31-2014 at 09:25 AM.
mcprodesign is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 10:48 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osage Beach, MO
Posts: 285
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quinlan
I had both 1.50 and 1.36 on my T/S Gun. The 1.36 gears seemed to hold up better. Also seemed to like the lab'ed 30 Bravos A lot better with the 1.36 Vs the 1.50 and 32's.
That was with both stock 575s and after rebuild with about 650 hp. Now I am over 725 and need to try some 34's

All around the 1.36 worked the best for me.
We have a customer with worked over 575s in a T/S who tried 34s, the boat would barely get on plane. We limped back to the dock and put the 32s back on!! Might be time for some 5 blades???
GL@PBC is offline  
Old 05-30-2014, 11:30 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaylord, Mi
Posts: 2,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unlimited39
Dr.pete, the boat was running 1:5:1 with 4 blade bravo 1 -32s with stock 575s, the motors were rebuilt- and Dynoed at 683hp @5600, they re geared the drives to 1:36 and spinning the same wheels but 30 pitch- boat GPSs at 96 mph- twin step, so it's set up right I believe, I was just concerned with longevity and dependability of the 1:36 gear ratio?
Very cool. I have been told buy drive guys that the 136 is stronger than 150 and as glass dave pointed out if you went back to 1.50 maybe you would lose performance due to needing bigger props.
drpete3 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.