![]() |
Another cool project from Marker 17 Marine
7 Attachment(s)
48 Ft Express Cruiser
|
why? I am sure it was a bunch of work and looks great. but why convert to outboards when you can have a pair of diesels?
|
We had two Cummins. Outboards are so much easier, quieter and just work better where we boat. The boat runs better, lighter and is easier to drive. I think Intrepid says it best:
The advantages of an outboard: more spacious, more efficient, more range. The 475 offers nearly twice as much topside and interior space as comparable sized inboards. In addition to all the stowage, recreational and living space afforded by the outboard configuration, engine noise and vibration are dramatically reduced. There’s less smoke and fuel odor. The roar and shudder of inboard acceleration simply never happens. In all, outboards add the finishing touch of luxury, with fuel-efficiency and range increased by up to 50 percent. The surefooted handling and precise response inspire total confidence. The hushed chorus of multiple outboards combines with aerodynamically neutral topside surfaces to reduce noise to “conversation level” even at speeds up to 55 mph. The hull form builds the trim in automatically. Bow rise is minimized, pitching and heeling are reduced, and the shallower draft means quiet seclusion in the shallower coves and anchorages an inboard vessel can’t reach. |
Interesting & I like it.
What are the speed differences with the outboards? |
Wait I thought you still had the diesels? Is this where you shed some pounds? What did it weigh before?
Any pics of the cockpit? |
Originally Posted by mcraymond3
(Post 4143158)
We had two Cummins. Outboards are so much easier, quieter and just work better where we boat. The boat runs better, lighter and is easier to drive. I think Intrepid says it best:
The advantages of an outboard: more spacious, more efficient, more range. The 475 offers nearly twice as much topside and interior space as comparable sized inboards. In addition to all the stowage, recreational and living space afforded by the outboard configuration, engine noise and vibration are dramatically reduced. There’s less smoke and fuel odor. The roar and shudder of inboard acceleration simply never happens. In all, outboards add the finishing touch of luxury, with fuel-efficiency and range increased by up to 50 percent. The surefooted handling and precise response inspire total confidence. The hushed chorus of multiple outboards combines with aerodynamically neutral topside surfaces to reduce noise to “conversation level” even at speeds up to 55 mph. The hull form builds the trim in automatically. Bow rise is minimized, pitching and heeling are reduced, and the shallower draft means quiet seclusion in the shallower coves and anchorages an inboard vessel can’t reach. |
What size are the outboards? I heard Mercury going to build 400 plus hp .
|
very interesting, would love to hear some numbers
|
Can't wait to see it in person on Friday. Looks great.
|
What did you do to the space where the motors used to be?
|
Interesting to say the least. The fuel burn of the (4) gas burning O/Bs vs. the (2) Cummins diesels will tell the story.... No doubt access to maintain is easier. Wonder how it effected the boat's CG?
|
Originally Posted by pbekemeyer
(Post 4143190)
What size are the outboards? I heard Mercury going to build 400 plus hp .
|
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4143185)
not in any way more efficient than a pair of diesels with surface drives that is a stupid statement.
|
I believe all the boats were three engine packages.
|
No some were available as twin cummins.
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]525186[/ATTACH]
Originally Posted by DirtyMoney
(Post 4143461)
No some were available as twin cummins.
|
Originally Posted by Dean Ferry
(Post 4143333)
Interesting to say the least. The fuel burn of the (4) gas burning O/Bs vs. the (2) Cummins diesels will tell the story.... No doubt access to maintain is easier. Wonder how it effected the boat's CG?
BTW great idea......plenty of those 48's are getting to be 8-10 years old and will have tired power (gas 525's or the diesels) so you basically built yourself a Cig Huntress for about 1/5 the cost! |
Originally Posted by Dean Ferry
(Post 4143333)
Interesting to say the least. The fuel burn of the (4) gas burning O/Bs vs. the (2) Cummins diesels will tell the story.... No doubt access to maintain is easier. Wonder how it effected the boat's CG?
2 550 Cummins wide open 60 GPH I don't understand why everybody says outboards are easier to maintain, diesels don't break down. They both require the same maintenance but the diesel intervals are longer. |
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4143531)
4 300 Verados wide open more or less 100GPH
2 550 Cummins wide open 60 GPH I don't understand why everybody says outboards are easier to maintain, diesels don't break down. They both require the same maintenance but the diesel intervals are longer. In my opinion, if you want trouble free boating, go OB whenever possible. |
love that rooster
Originally Posted by Sydwayz
(Post 4143469)
|
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4143308)
What did you do to the space where the motors used to be?
|
Originally Posted by stimleck
(Post 4143585)
love that rooster
|
Originally Posted by DirtyMoney
(Post 4143183)
Wait I thought you still had the diesels? Is this where you shed some pounds? What did it weigh before?
Any pics of the cockpit? Cockpit same for now. That is next winters project. |
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4143185)
not in any way more efficient than a pair of diesels with surface drives that is a stupid statement.
|
Originally Posted by Sportboats
(Post 4143476)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]525186[/ATTACH]
I have never seen a twin but anything is possible. |
Mc,
Do you take that bad boy down New River? I spent 11 months at New River MCAS back in 2010 working for Lockheed, and loved boating on New River, ONCE I figured out where to go and NOT to go... :) |
Looks sweet, where are you going to be running that thing?
|
I love it.....I have ridden in a 48 a few times and really like the room and the performance of the boat but the engine noise was too loud for a cruiser....Brian and I had often talked about the answer would be to rig one with outboards.....Congrats to Mat and also to Brian Forehand at Marker 17 for putting together one badazz cruiser
|
Originally Posted by mcraymond3
(Post 4143595)
I don't think it is either. That is off Intrepid Boats website. However, if you factor in that diesel fuel is almost $1.00 more per gallon.........
That is not true at marinas here in Miami and in the Bahamas, gasoline is $1.00 more per gallon, I'm pretty sure you aren't taking that beast on a trailer to the local gas station. Running costs in $/mile is double with outboards vs diesels. Not saying wasn't a cool idea what you did, just a lot of misinformation being thrown around here. |
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4143575)
The Cummins aren't as bulletproof as the OB's. Diesels don't break down? Bobthebuilder blew one up in his 50 Nortech after 500 hours, my buddy has them in a diesel flybridge cruiser and they have been fair at best with reliability. Also keep in mind the diesels are more way more complex than an old Detroit Diesel from 25 years ago and they don't love high rpms, throttles nailed to the dash for long stretches.
In my opinion, if you want trouble free boating, go OB whenever possible. Outboards have also increased in complexity, no way they are more reliable than a diesel. So two people you know have had issues with diesel engines nobody you know has had any problems with an outboard?? Now if you are talking about trouble free because you can get a 7 year warranty and worst case just slap a new one on yes that is easier, and more people can work on them. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4143759)
They also talk about shafts, and yes in that case complete waste of a diesel engine, but that is just boatbuilders being lazy.
That is not true at marinas here in Miami and in the Bahamas, gasoline is $1.00 more per gallon, I'm pretty sure you aren't taking that beast on a trailer to the local gas station. Running costs in $/mile is double with outboards vs diesels. Not saying wasn't a cool idea what you did, just a lot of misinformation being thrown around here. Sure, why not! |
Originally Posted by Earthwerks
(Post 4143783)
.
Sure, why not! |
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4143769)
Sorry I disagree 100% you can run a diesel at 90% throttle forever, and the commercial rated ones are for continuous 100% throttle, try that with an outboard. I have 600+ hrs on my Yanmars and I have not had one single problem with them, not one, in 4 years. The total maintenance I have done, one valve adjustment, oil changes every 150 hrs, one coolant replacement, one set of zincs and impellers, outdrive gear lube every 50 hrs. Everybody I know with a verado boat has had multiple issues, the Yamahas don't seem to be as bad. My boat runs a best of 58 mph and gets 2 mpg going 50 mph. I have run them throttles pinned to the dash for 30 minutes many times, no issues.
Outboards have also increased in complexity, no way they are more reliable than a diesel. So two people you know have had issues with diesel engines nobody you know has had any problems with an outboard?? Now if you are talking about trouble free because you can get a 7 year warranty and worst case just slap a new one on yes that is easier, and more people can work on them. |
We ran the boat this weekend in Norfolk for Power Boating For a Cure! I could not be happier with the performance! It ran 55 mph with 18 people and ten coolers on board. Jumped up on plane (not sure it would have planed with diesels and all those people) was quiet and it sits about a foot higher out of the water with the less weight and buoyancy from bracket. That was another issue, I could only get it off the lift at high tide. With half a tank of fuel and three people, it ran over 60 mph. I didn't even look once to see if oil was being pumped out of the bilge into the marina.
|
All statements above are correct, the boat is a stellar package now that makes one heck of a great place to party. Looks and runs great, congrats on a very successful conversion. I would add that the design/engineering stress test went very well as no motors were left behind as the boat hammered the less than perfect water conditions Saturday.
So who was putting down that sheen in the marina ? LOL |
After riding on the 48 this weekend I have not stopped thinking about taking the in-boards out of my 38 Sport Cruiser & going with outboards. Flawless, stealthy, sporty, and performed great in rough water. Could not hear the engines running. I watched the screens in the rough and the RPM's were the same across both screens. Other than the sound of big blocks I wouldn't miss a thing about inboards. Great job to all involved in that change over.
|
Originally Posted by mcraymond3
(Post 4145934)
We ran the boat this weekend in Norfolk for Power Boating For a Cure! I could not be happier with the performance! It ran 55 mph with 18 people and ten coolers on board. Jumped up on plane (not sure it would have planed with diesels and all those people) was quiet and it sits about a foot higher out of the water with the less weight and buoyancy from bracket. That was another issue, I could only get it off the lift at high tide. With half a tank of fuel and three people, it ran over 60 mph. I didn't even look once to see if oil was being pumped out of the bilge into the marina.
|
Originally Posted by Kelly O
(Post 4145951)
All statements above are correct, the boat is a stellar package now that makes one heck of a great place to party. Looks and runs great, congrats on a very successful conversion. I would add that the design/engineering stress test went very well as no motors were left behind as the boat hammered the less than perfect water conditions Saturday.
So who was putting down that sheen in the marina ? LOL |
If you were looking to lose weight and get 1200 hp of outboards why didn't you go with two Seven Marine 557 hp outboards?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.