41 apache worth.
#111
Registered

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 1,377
From: naples,florida
OHH and LENGTH is KING in any BIG WATER if you can keep the weight in a correct balance of COG and the hull built light but structurally resilient enough to absorb the pounding of the waves rather than reflecting those loads to the passengers.
I think there is a fine line between a potato chip and a wet burrito.
I think there is a fine line between a potato chip and a wet burrito.
Last edited by tommymonza; 07-25-2014 at 12:16 AM.
#115
Registered

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 752
From: Traverse City, Michigan
My choice to match any Apache in big water is a Magnum. http://magnummarine.com/history/
ed
ed
Last edited by Interceptor; 07-25-2014 at 10:13 AM.
#118
I think the Fountains ended up having a slight advantage in that thread due to sea cows flocking to the Cigs. I believe the addition of Apache would alter that outcome however. Since a higher percentage of Apache boats lack a swim platform the cows would have a difficult time boarding. If they did manage to get on board they would quickly fall off due to not being able to fit down into the holes of the 3 and 6 pack cockpits they typically have leaving the power to weight ratio intact. Meanwhile the cows would have no problem dragging themselves up the Fountains integrated platforms and rolling into the pleasure cockpits. This would take away the weight advantage of the Fountain. Now on equal footing weight wise the typically more powerful Apache would walk the Fountain. In rough seas the Fountain might even sustain some damage due to the lighter layup and added weight.
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks
Straight bottoms and flat decks




