Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
It looks like Crane is not the valve train component for me! >

It looks like Crane is not the valve train component for me!

Notices

It looks like Crane is not the valve train component for me!

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-08-2014, 09:38 PM
  #61  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Soild rollers are a PITA always need tear down and inspection. Usally due to high spring loads bearings in lifters and rockers often fail. Have pulled rockes of such engines and find needle bearings fall out or have already. Pure race might go for it but not for pleasure / poker runs/ racing combo.
turbo2256b is offline  
Old 11-08-2014, 12:33 PM
  #62  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[ATTACH=CONFIG]532279[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]532280[/ATTACH]well the dyno doesn't lie, 603 hp. Paid for 650, Builder Said it was still building power when red line was reached but with a stated rpm limit on the ( sales brochure ) and proof of the dyno sheet that stated hp was not attained sounds like misrepresentation to me.
Attached Thumbnails It looks like Crane is not the valve train component for me!-img_9904.jpg   It looks like Crane is not the valve train component for me!-img_3422.jpg  
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 06:57 AM
  #63  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OK CIty, OK
Posts: 1,449
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, what now?
Cole2534 is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 07:12 AM
  #64  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
donzi matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Moultonborough NH
Posts: 1,339
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy Nielsen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]532279[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]532280[/ATTACH]well the dyno doesn't lie, 603 hp. Paid for 650, Builder Said it was still building power when red line was reached but with a stated rpm limit on the ( sales brochure ) and proof of the dyno sheet that stated hp was not attained sounds like misrepresentation to me.

Good luck with that. I am sure the original builder would argue variations in different dynos being the reason for the less than 10% variation. It sucks, but probably nothing you will get out of it. How about advancing the cam a bit to try and bring your peak HP down under redline?
donzi matt is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 07:55 AM
  #65  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy Nielsen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]530314[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]530315[/ATTACH]Mcprodesign, these are not merc engines. Sorry for any confusion. These engines are Bullet Engines 650hp normally aspirated series 540 cid. They are Merlin III blocks, this one has a Callies compstar crank, Manley H beam rods, Manley flat top pistons, Edelbrock marine rpm heads, Crane cam, & lifters, Crower pushrods, & Scorpion rocker arms. At least that is what the part #s are telling me.
What cam, intake, and carb ?

As an FYI: Eddy heads used on many 500-600hp NA Builds. You don't really see'm on NA builds higher than that.

AFR's / Specialized Brodix and etc, yes.

Many 600-640HP 502's out there with AFR's.

Many 600-700HP 540's with AFR's.
SB is online now  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:01 AM
  #66  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

I just got my computer to bring up the dyno sheet.

There is some problems !

Mid .300's for BSFC's ?

Don't think so. This usually means the dyno sheet is jacked up power wise.

I'll run some #'s when I get back in from blowing leaves.

And yeh, the fuel usage and air flow used is down from strong motors in the mid 600's.

The dyno operator should have pulled the engine to higher rpm so the owner can see the whole picture.
SB is online now  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:01 AM
  #67  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

I just got my computer to bring up the dyno sheet.

There is some problems !

Mid .300's for BSFC's ?

Don't think so. This usually means the dyno sheet is jacked up power wise.

I'll run some #'s when I get back in from blowing leaves.

And yeh, the fuel usage and air flow used is down from strong motors in the mid 600's.

The dyno operator should have pulled the engine to higher rpm so the owner can see the whole picture.
SB is online now  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:06 AM
  #68  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,094
Received 700 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

cams just about right for your Hp http://www.cranecams.com/product/car...detail&p=24223.
to get over 650hp,I had to use a cam in the 250° intake range.also on a 540 w/ canfield 320 heads
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 09:40 AM
  #69  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taunton Ma
Posts: 8,527
Received 698 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Randy I have 2 of those 651 cams I'll be selling soon
Unlimited jd is offline  
Old 11-09-2014, 03:25 PM
  #70  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Omaha Ne
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just wanted to post the dyno results that we got so anyone can see what I have. He said it wasn't done making power at that red line but this isn't a race boat and was not propped to run above the stated rpm. We are changing heads & stuff so I will update when we get some progress made.
Randy Nielsen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.