|
FYI,,, Do NOT catch air on your segway....bad things are likely to happen.
|
Originally Posted by Fast Shafts
(Post 4252855)
....and I bet both sides signed a "non disclosure" agreement-sealing what could be relavant information from preventing this tragedy again. :(
|
^^^ I can't find a way to view without paying.
|
Originally Posted by bck
(Post 4253355)
^^^ I can't find a way to view without paying.
|
Originally Posted by PARADOX
(Post 4253068)
Typ. attorney, lawsuit BS. How come Ford wasn't in the law suit not providing "adequate" measures to hold a "potentially" dangerous beverage? Chew on this for a while.
Oh.. BTW.. PS.. Let me get this straight, An old lady gets a verdict, (reduced later) for 2.7 Mill, for getting her seldom used, (I would think) private part burned. Grattons gets less then 2 mill for loss of life, (no matter how, or why it happened) The legal system SUX. That's all folks. iddbibidudilut dot. It's ALL about mathematics and the legal dudes bragging rights. NOTHING to do with right and wrong. (see my previous disclaimer RE; attorneys) <JIC> |
Originally Posted by bck
(Post 4253355)
^^^ I can't find a way to view without paying.
FYI, Some of the testimony has already hit YouTube |
Originally Posted by stimleck
(Post 4253562)
Tee lawyer publicly stated "we made a demand and it was met" The settlement was dictated by the plaintiffs
|
I had oral surgery yesterday, so I am on pain meds. If I weren't, I would lay into you for knowing ABSOLUTELY nothing about how the legal system works, because there were obviously plenty of offers that went back and forth since the incident, and the DEFENDANTS dictated the settlement, because they CHOSE to accept the offer rather than try the case in front of a jury they helped to pick.
Looks like you have been around OSO for a while. Stick around, and you may learn something yet. |
You think I'am talking just about SBI only think again!:hitfan:I'll double that bet that more law suits follow this one care to take that bet:bsflag:
|
Originally Posted by PARADOX
(Post 4253573)
I understand. The "demand" was for less then the actual claim. Whatever it was it was less. The settlement was written all over this from the get go. That's all. (misc. I'm not an attorney, but I been in the "arena" as a witness and as an expert witness in legal matters enough to see the writing on the wall) I just hope this helps future safety and not hurt the racing venues.
X rated 30 if your comment was meant for me I was referring to the fact that the plaintiffs lawyer asked for a settlement amount and got it, of course the defence needed to agree. I don't need to be a message board member for a decade to have an opinion or a brain. Regarding your threat to "lay in to me" get a life. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.