Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Why Doesn't Mercury Up The Cubes On Big Outboards? >

Why Doesn't Mercury Up The Cubes On Big Outboards?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Why Doesn't Mercury Up The Cubes On Big Outboards?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-27-2015 | 06:35 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,825
Likes: 612
From: Clarkston, Michigan
Default

The 7s are a different story. They took a car engine and bolted it vertically to a gear case. Mercury has been on top of the game developing outboards with proprietary components. Just wondering why they're stuck on 2.6 liters.
thirdchildhood is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2015 | 06:48 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: yorktown,va
Default

It could be the weight...the 400's are 400 lbs lighter than a 7, that gives them a power to weight advantage. Then again they could just be trying to get the most out of that design before having to redesign and retool for more displacement.
turbofox54 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2015 | 07:14 AM
  #13  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by airjunky
Hondas 3.5 v6 is the only variable valve timing outboard i know of .its a big 60degree sohc unit .real simple real durable .real expensive . But oh the possibilities of something like that in a 8.2 v8 version. Especially pre-cat
could have your radical cam for off idle , and no wake zone reversion proof cam profile at idle
of course there is the cadillac blower motor outboard think its the 7 . 5.3 liter ? Unholy expensive
Suzukis have variable valve timing and are the most reasonably OBs on the market.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2015 | 07:18 AM
  #14  
SS930's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 3
From: At the office.
Default

When it comes to 4 strokes large ci = heavy. They can typically make more power with less weight with a high reving smaller CI engine with forced induction than they can with a big CI engine NA engine.
SS930 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 358
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, Mn
Default

Originally Posted by boostbros
better yet why are they still using the old iron duke 3 liter 4 cylinder that is from the late 50s! there are some wicked 4 bangers out there today i keep telling my boy if something happens to his vw passat with a 2.5 5 cylinder i want to put it in a boat, that engine is ultra smooth sounds wicked and rips i think merc is hurting the entry level boats by not marinizing a few better engines
Agreed infact GM makes a 4cyl direct injected marine motor that puts out 275hp all day long. Its based of the AHU car motor, last I heard it wasnt beind sold state sides thou.

I have my feelers into GM about getting a marine Manifold for one, as I can get one of those motors fairly easy. Would be great set-up for my pontoon that I'm already building a LS1 for. Same hp half the weight.
turbom700 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2015 | 06:28 PM
  #16  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 7
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

why invest money when suckers are lining up?
stimleck is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.