![]() |
How bout a tq splitter gear box and a pair of alphas lol... it will save you some money...
Why not an ssm 8? Thats mercs biggest baddest drive til the 10 comes out |
Yes with the Merc twin shafts for the current 6 and up. Cost is not cheap either. I understand the SC lower is not that strong either. If I recall I think the Merc 6 is rated up to 1100 hp and a full SCX what is 900 or 1000 hp ? I know its 900 hp max or 1000 hp max if I recall correctly for a full SCX.
|
Originally Posted by BUP
(Post 4501584)
Yes with the Merc twin shafts for the current 6 and up. Cost is not cheap either. I understand the SC lower is not that strong either. If I recall I think the Merc 6 is rated up to 1100 hp and a full SCX what is 900 or 1000 hp ? I know its 900 hp max or 1000 hp max if I recall correctly for a full SCX.
I'm not to up to speed on the scx/sc lower combo as far as long term reliability with a torque engine package in a big single. It might hold up, my gut says probably not though. 900ft lb stump puller build, in a big single engine hull, prob gonna be tough on the gears. imco states MAXIMUM idle speed to be 800RPM for the scx. The drive holds 4.5 quarts of lube. A wet sump #6, held 20 quarts. A SSM V, held about 8 quarts, and an old 3A, about 10 quarts. |
I would like to see a pair of bravo lowers mounted to a #6 upper. Would not be that hard to do. Ask Tyson be a walk in the park for him. Big silver cat.
|
Great thread thanks for sharing!
Sounds like you will easily achieve your power and reliability goals! |
Originally Posted by BUP
(Post 4501584)
Yes with the Merc twin shafts for the current 6 and up. Cost is not cheap either. I understand the SC lower is not that strong either. If I recall I think the Merc 6 is rated up to 1100 hp and a full SCX what is 900 or 1000 hp ? I know its 900 hp max or 1000 hp max if I recall correctly for a full SCX.
Like the guy stated earlier a little too much fuel getting on plane and boom. Why arent u looking at the ssm8? |
Originally Posted by 14 apache
(Post 4501595)
I would like to see a pair of bravo lowers mounted to a #6 upper. Would not be that hard to do. Ask Tyson be a walk in the park for him. Big silver cat.
|
What about the x power drive? I know someone on here just bought a cat with those but haven't heard much. This boat is to be a trailblazer of sorts, so why not if starting from scratch.
Always easier helping others spend their money. :D great build and thanks for sharing. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4501570)
I think someone was blowing smoke your way. The big benefit of a SSM 6, is having dual vertical shafts, with dual gearsets in the lower. Properly setup, each gear and shaft, has to withstand 50% of the torque load. Not 100%. Benefit? You can run smaller diameter gears, and a more efficient lower case. The uppers gears and shafts are plenty big to handle the power. Its a design thats been around for several decades now, and race proven. It was used in the SSM 3,4,5,6, and now 8. Mercury never had a cone clutched drive that successfully handled power that you will be making.
Personally, I think you'll be chunking those standard SC lower gears, especially if you run hard in anything other than flat water. Either way, awesome build, looking forward to the results. |
Originally Posted by iliveonanisland
(Post 4501620)
You talking about a single six upper transerring power to a pair lf bravo lowers?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.