Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Why Are Inadequate Drives Acceptable On Boats? >

Why Are Inadequate Drives Acceptable On Boats?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Why Are Inadequate Drives Acceptable On Boats?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-21-2017 | 09:06 AM
  #21  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,327
Likes: 1,830
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Slide
I mean, if you run any equipment at or past its maximum rating, you're going to have reduced life at best. Most of the world's Bravo drives are putting around behind stock power and doing their jobs perfectly fine.
And staying in the water. Start flying the boat and issues happen. Not saying it's good but that is the reality.

Comparing to cars isn't fair, they have a LOT more money for R&D and because of volume can drive the price down.

I would like to see how many failures there are on some of the performance cars out there if they install slicks and start running at the drags a LOT. Think about it, one good long day at the drag strip isn't even a hour run in good choppy water when you think how many times the boat drives can be loaded and unloaded when flying.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 10:21 AM
  #22  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 752
From: Traverse City, Michigan
Default

1. Market to small to develop a new better Bravo drive.
Interceptor is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 10:25 AM
  #23  
VoodooRob's Avatar
VIP Member
10 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 48
From: Cleveland Ohio
Default

I don't know if its inadequate but more overpowered. Many of us are guilty, including me. Merc supplied XRs behind factory 600SCIs on our boat, boat came that way because they sell the package that way. Should have NXT or IMCO but original owner checked the cheaper box on the order. When drives fail it's my problem. Same thing with 496 Mag boats, they should have XRs , not X or Bravo. XRs on a 38 Top Gun with 525s is a perfect example, a lot of boat on drives that just can't handle the power to begin with. Running in the middle of a products service range will yield much better results than on the far reaches of it's capabilities. How many people on here build engines and just run the stock drive, then bash Bravos because they don't hold up. I will agree drive parts are very over priced, but when your the Goliath of your industry .....
VoodooRob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 10:27 AM
  #24  
VoodooRob's Avatar
VIP Member
10 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 48
From: Cleveland Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
1. Market to small to develop a new better Bravo drive.
There is a badass small drive company out there,adapted INDY car technology to drives, can't remember the name someone posted on OSO about them a few weeks ago. Very expensive but handle big HP and no failures. Maybe someone will chime in.


P.S. Here it is X Power http://www.xpowerdrive.com/site56/home.html

Last edited by VoodooRob; 04-21-2017 at 10:29 AM.
VoodooRob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 11:05 AM
  #25  
CLA
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 618
Likes: 4
Default

I've been running SCX's with blueprinted 1400 lowers swinging #6 wheels. It is a great setup. Just call up IMCO and order one or two.
CLA is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 11:20 AM
  #26  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

If you were building a new boat what would get? SCX seems like the best deal. Asd 7s the next best deal. Then 6s which is what the fastest Vs still run.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 11:25 AM
  #27  
CLA
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 618
Likes: 4
Default

I re-did my boat when I bought it so the SCX made a lot of sense. Sold my XR/imco setup for the cost of one SCX and then bought the other. Props are $9500 but the slip numbers and performance is not even close to the bravo setup. You can also run a #6 tiebar.

When I buy again if new its 400R OB's but if used I'd go #6 or #8.
CLA is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 12:00 PM
  #28  
VP of the tickfaw200
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 185
From: baton rouge, louisiana
Default

Saw that don't want to run a reverse rotation motor
caseyh is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 12:04 PM
  #29  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 664
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

Originally Posted by VoodooRob
There is a badass small drive company out there,adapted INDY car technology to drives, can't remember the name someone posted on OSO about them a few weeks ago. Very expensive but handle big HP and no failures. Maybe someone will chime in.


P.S. Here it is X Power http://www.xpowerdrive.com/site56/home.html
This is interesting anyone have an idea on the Pricing?

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2017 | 12:31 PM
  #30  
VoodooRob's Avatar
VIP Member
10 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 48
From: Cleveland Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
If you were building a new boat what would get? SCX seems like the best deal. Asd 7s the next best deal. Then 6s which is what the fastest Vs still run.
Outboards ....All Day Long, then if I had to build a stern drive boat IMCO, if budget allowed X Power.
VoodooRob is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.