Notices
General Boating Discussion

Headers on a 496 HO

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2018 | 07:11 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Likes: 3
From: Oslo
Default

Thank you for the reply

From what most people are saying that is not possible …
SO you where lucky ,ot drove with a light hand on your throtle ?
With out knowing to much about this, I am sure of one thing, if you leave your engine stock, it will be more durable then
taking more HP out of it, no matter if its 350, 454 Mag, 502 or a 496
So it comes down to evaluate the risk, and be careful. ;-)
Monaco20 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 03:33 PM
  #32  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 225
From: Ohio
Default

Those headers are 20 years old.

Gains will be minimal at best.

The juice isn’t worth the squeeze.
tmmii is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 08:11 PM
  #33  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 148
Default

3.5#’s on the procharger kit you should be fine. Procharger tends to send a pretty rich running tune up for safety. The procharger boost does not have the quick torque like a Whipple so the drive should last as long as your not coming in and out of the water a lot. We had the “good” 496 2003 and they said 5#’s was the max we ran 7 with no issues.
apex svt is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2018 | 06:59 AM
  #34  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 490
Likes: 185
From: Syracuse,NewYork
Default

I had ITS Merc XR drive and drove it like a normal high performance boat. The inner cooler and package designed for the motor that Whipple developed works as they say it will. The original setup made 5-6 lbs of boost. Dustin remapped my computer again and gave me a smaller pulley to make 7-8 lbs. Never an issue. 71-73 mph then 81 or so with 5-6lbs then 84+ with 7-8lbs. 86.7 with 5 blade prop worked from B blades. 30' Superboat y2k
Cary 29 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-09-2018 | 06:46 AM
  #35  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,825
Likes: 612
From: Clarkston, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by boatfreak
I'm guessing you will get a wide range of answers but I put CMI sport tubes on my 496 several yrs ago when they first came out and while the looked cool and even sounded better I didn't see any performance gains.
Me too. I spent 4k on CMIs for my old 496 HO and saw absolutely zero gain. Don't buy into the fake hp gain claims.
thirdchildhood is offline  
Reply
Old 11-09-2018 | 06:58 AM
  #36  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Likes: 3
From: Oslo
Default

Thanks for the replies

Thats a lot of money for only the look and sound :-)

I am going to pay 400, if its pas the pressure test :-)

And the fact that I should change my manifolds next season (2009 model engine) makes it kind of interesting
Monaco20 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-09-2018 | 07:06 AM
  #37  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 891
Default

I’d pass even if they were free...
1MOSES1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-09-2018 | 11:49 AM
  #38  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 536
Default

Originally Posted by Monaco20
Thanks for the replies

Thats a lot of money for only the look and sound :-)

I am going to pay 400, if its pas the pressure test :-)

And the fact that I should change my manifolds next season (2009 model engine) makes it kind of interesting
Do you boat in salt water? Is it flushed after each use?

My 496 manifolds (aluminum) are 15 years old and still going strong.
underpsi68 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.