Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   525 SC questions (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/365208-525-sc-questions.html)

SCARAB.23.SCS 03-03-2020 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by thisistank (Post 4727884)
My 97 Baja 24 Outlaw came with a 454 from the factory. Boat weighed about 4500 lbs. I pulled the 454 and dropped in a fresh 525SC in 2000. You definitely can keep out of the boost and obviously save fuel but in the end, carb'd big motors suck lots of fuel and add a blower on top, it sucks even more. They weren't built with fuel efficiency in mind. Like Griff said, I was figuring around 1 mile per gallon too in both the baja and our Top Gun. So you have 54 gallons, you're good for 54 miles, stay out of the boost and I'm sure you could get into the 75 - 80 mile range.

Thanks for the detailed info! Im definitely considering this motor. I do 62 mph now with the 330hp motor. I'm sure I'd be in the high 70s with the 525.

Would be pretty awesome. And realisticly the longest trips I go on are within range of 50 miles by far.

phragle 03-03-2020 09:13 PM

for comparisons sake... with a 330 hp 454 I was right at 60, raised the x 2.25 or so, and a rather warmed up 525sc has me at 83 and still playing with props.

SCARAB.23.SCS 03-03-2020 09:15 PM


Originally Posted by phragle (Post 4727926)
for comparisons sake... with a 330 hp 454 I was right at 60, raised the x 2.25 or so, and a rather warmed up 525sc has me at 83 and still playing with props.

Wow! What a difference. Must feel like a totally different boat.

phragle 03-03-2020 09:22 PM

https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/...502-415hp.html

SCARAB.23.SCS 03-03-2020 09:35 PM


Originally Posted by phragle (Post 4727928)

Thanks for the link, informative thread. By the sounds of those HP/mph numbers I'd be doing 80 easy.

flat rate 03-03-2020 09:43 PM

We had a new 1999 42 fountain with trip 525sc They were great engines and way conservative. They said they burned 60 gallons a hour at wot x3 and I would agree. The fuel burn plus premium fuel was stupid and back then it was $5.00 a gallon. We put high altitude pulleys on and it helped. I’m sure they could be leaned out a bit to help the fuel burn. They didn’t need the 1050 dominators on them. That being said you won’t hurt them they will
run forever !!

flat rate 03-03-2020 09:44 PM

The only problems we had was ignition coils. They laid down stock. Replaced with msd ss coils

SCARAB.23.SCS 03-03-2020 09:51 PM


Originally Posted by flat rate (Post 4727934)
We had a new 1999 42 fountain with trip 525sc They were great engines and way conservative. They said they burned 60 gallons a hour at wot x3 and I would agree. The fuel burn plus premium fuel was stupid and back then it was $5.00 a gallon. We put high altitude pulleys on and it helped. I’m sure they could be leaned out a bit to help the fuel burn. They didn’t need the 1050 dominators on them. That being said you won’t hurt them they will
run forever !!

Wow that must have been quite the fuel bill 3x

Swamplizard 03-04-2020 06:57 AM

Would be interesting to see someone compare 525sc with 1050 versus with an EFI. Bet the idle consumption would go way down....but at 5000rpm gotta believe it would be remarkably the same.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.