Transom water pickup vs through hull
#51
Registered
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
The official Mercruiser closed cooling kit requires it. It is in the manual.You probably have an aftermarket kit.Of course, there is nothing that can stop you not to install additional pickup.
#52
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,329
Likes: 1,834
From: Merritt Island, FL
Edit:
I just cruised through Mercurys parts catalog and can not find that part number, care to share a link to this information?
Last edited by Wildman_grafix; 08-30-2024 at 08:01 AM.
#53
Registered
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I do not get that, I have friends with both factory Merc closed cooled 525's, 600SCI and they all used the factory water pickup through the drive. Pretty sure the 39 Velocity with 565's also did.
Edit:
I just cruised through Mercurys parts catalog and can not find that part number, care to share a link to this information?
Edit:
I just cruised through Mercurys parts catalog and can not find that part number, care to share a link to this information?
#54
Registered
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
If you go through this catalog, it is Y-shaped fitting, part #2, that connects to alternative transom/hull water pickup.
http://www.boats.net/catalog/mercrui...g-system-bravo
http://www.boats.net/catalog/mercrui...g-system-bravo
#57
Interesting.
maybe because it’s a full system and they feel they need more flow to cool exhaust?
I stand by my comment - I’d install without initially and monitor your temps. They move a LOT of water and I’ll bet you won’t have any issues.
maybe because it’s a full system and they feel they need more flow to cool exhaust?
I stand by my comment - I’d install without initially and monitor your temps. They move a LOT of water and I’ll bet you won’t have any issues.
#58
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,329
Likes: 1,834
From: Merritt Island, FL
Thank you for the link.
Like seaford said that is a full system including the exhaust (nice) when most performance installs do not cool the headers with the closed cooling.
I would try it without if you are using it on something like a 300hp 5.7 and monitor.
Unless the motor is out already.
Like seaford said that is a full system including the exhaust (nice) when most performance installs do not cool the headers with the closed cooling.
I would try it without if you are using it on something like a 300hp 5.7 and monitor.
Unless the motor is out already.
#59
Registered


Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 420
From: BC
Running a full system off the Bravo raw water feed depends on a few factors. Boating location and expected raw water temps. Exh manifold size and style. Fresh water circulation flow through the heat exchanger.
Generally, fresh water heat exchanged engines run a bit warmer at a 160°F thermostat, where the temp differential in the heat exchanger is greater. Also having a consistent block coolant pressure etc.
Often the full systems have the thermostat in the heat exchanger, to enable coolant flow through the exh manifolds before thermostat opening. Will also warm up the engine faster.
One of the potential coolant flow bottlenecks is the exh manifolds.
Generally, fresh water heat exchanged engines run a bit warmer at a 160°F thermostat, where the temp differential in the heat exchanger is greater. Also having a consistent block coolant pressure etc.
Often the full systems have the thermostat in the heat exchanger, to enable coolant flow through the exh manifolds before thermostat opening. Will also warm up the engine faster.
One of the potential coolant flow bottlenecks is the exh manifolds.
#60
Registered
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 288
Likes: 92
From: WI



