![]() |
Lets talk about Raylar
Gents some advice if you please; I am looking at a boat powered with 496 HOs wi- Raylar Big Power CNC aluminum cylinder heads,Raylar's full-roller rockers,BP-206 Max Effort Camshafts and Pistons. Aeromotive fuel system with upgraded injectors. Between 100-200 hours. The problem: love the boat, like to run WOT very occassionaly, butI really dont need all the power and would prefer a reliable, EZ maintenance setup. The Question: Since i dont have a heavy foot but i do like to cruise pretty fast, maybe 3500-4000 RPM. Given my preference for reliability, am I insane to consider these Raylar motors? Raylars- run from them like a scalded dog or reliable if not beat on? Thanks.
|
I didn’t think they were really anymore maintenance than any other performance engine. The normal routine maintenance checks and replacements etc. I wouldn’t let them be any deal breaker and you’ll be happier in the long run. Otherwise whatever you get engine wise you’ll be wanting to upgrade after a season. JMO
|
Probably the same answers as you got here https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/...ot-raylar.html
|
Deja Vu
|
Originally Posted by Griff
(Post 4825496)
Probably the same answers as you got here https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/...ot-raylar.html
|
It sounds like you want stock power, but this boat has massively modified motors. All you can do is get all the information about the motors and make an informed decision. Sounds like they used the right parts, but who put the motors together? Someone with experience? You say between 100-200 hours on the motors or since the the Raylar kit was installed? A delta of 100 hours is a lot. Are you going to maintain them? If not, is your marina or mechanic ok with Raylar built 496's? Get a survey, leak down test, go run them if you can.
If the motors were built correctly, maintained correctly, run correctly there is no reason to think they won't continue to run, especially if you are planning on running them reasonably. Raylar gear, when installed correctly and maintained correctly are just fine. |
lol'ing at the multiple threads...
|
Originally Posted by techman
(Post 4825510)
It sounds like you want stock power, but this boat has massively modified motors. All you can do is get all the information about the motors and make an informed decision. Sounds like they used the right parts, but who put the motors together? Someone with experience? You say between 100-200 hours on the motors or since the the Raylar kit was installed? A delta of 100 hours is a lot. Are you going to maintain them? If not, is your marina or mechanic ok with Raylar built 496's? Get a survey, leak down test, go run them if you can.
If the motors were built correctly, maintained correctly, run correctly there is no reason to think they won't continue to run, especially if you are planning on running them reasonably. Raylar gear, when installed correctly and maintained correctly are just fine. |
The 496HO platform is a very reliable, long hour running engine in general. There are some weaknesses we've seen over time, however not common. These are piston failures, sometimes rods. The stock fuel system has had issues also. Those Raylar kits addressed those weaknesses. I wouldn't hesitate to purchase these, especially since they have run 100+ hours. In my experience if something is going to fail it's generally at low hours after someone worked on it or modified it.
|
Originally Posted by Michaeloh59
(Post 4825487)
, but really don`t need all the power and would prefer a reliable EZ maintenance set up ..
|
I’m gonna wait for the 3rd identical thread to chime in technically again.
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4825623)
said no one ever and yeah don`t we all.
|
Originally Posted by Michaeloh59
(Post 4825625)
Lol. I sense skepticism. Would it help if i said Im an old man and would be quite happy with a 70 mph boat to take the Granchilrens for rides?
|
Originally Posted by sb
(Post 4825624)
i’m gonna wait for the 3rd identical thread to chime in technically again.
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4825626)
If that's the case, get stock 496ho's.
|
I had a 2003 496 HO with a complete raylar package installed. The stock motor was swapped at 50 hrs in 2003 with the raylar 496. When this swap was done you do a exchange with raylar for a complete ready to drop in package. The boat is still around on our lake a running as good as ever. Just routine maintenance done every year on it. It's around 700ish hrs on it last time I saw the owner.
|
1. If the boat is still available in this market there might be something wrong with it.
2. I have a set of them, they run very well. Once the original owner replaced everything (specifically forged pistons) they have very similar characteristics as Mercury 525's - they way they run are very reliable assuming the company who built them did it correctly. The cam is basically the same as the 525 and it yields roughly the same power and torque as well as the way they sound. |
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
Originally Posted by PA.WOODCHUCK
(Post 4825653)
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
Originally Posted by PA.WOODCHUCK
(Post 4825653)
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
What were the issues with the pistons and rods. For some reason I was thinking the pistons were the same as a 454 mag engine (forged) Not certain what rods they used however if rods are a weak point then there’s got to be other “trouble makers” going on. Takes a lot to break a rod!
|
Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
(Post 4825726)
Depends on what tune Whipple puts in the ECU.
I presume it's for how much HP it makes? |
Originally Posted by PA.WOODCHUCK
(Post 4825794)
I presume it's for how much HP it makes?
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4825757)
What were the issues with the pistons and rods. For some reason I was thinking the pistons were the same as a 454 mag engine (forged) Not certain what rods they used however if rods are a weak point then there’s got to be other “trouble makers” going on. Takes a lot to break a rod!
|
Appreciate the comments. Well, the on topic comments anyway:)
|
Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
(Post 4825652)
1. If the boat is still available in this market there might be something wrong with it.
2. I have a set of them, they run very well. Once the original owner replaced everything (specifically forged pistons) they have very similar characteristics as Mercury 525's - they way they run are very reliable assuming the company who built them did it correctly. The cam is basically the same as the 525 and it yields roughly the same power and torque as well as the way they sound. |
Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
(Post 4826153)
I disagree with market comment. I've seen a lot of decent boats for sale not move and starting to see lots of price drops. The market for these single purpose go-fast boats isn't what it was in 2020 or 2021.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4825757)
What were the issues with the pistons and rods. For some reason I was thinking the pistons were the same as a 454 mag engine (forged) Not certain what rods they used however if rods are a weak point then there’s got to be other “trouble makers” going on. Takes a lot to break a rod!
A select few of the first year 496HO engines had a forged Kellog crankshaft, after that everything was cast. Generally speaking most consider the stock cast crank to be good up to around 750HP. Valve springs are the biggest weakness on the heads, they have about 90lbs seat pressure. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.