Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Help Deciding - Velocity vs Checkmate >

Help Deciding - Velocity vs Checkmate

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Help Deciding - Velocity vs Checkmate

Old 04-09-2022 | 08:39 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
From: New Hampshire
Default Help Deciding - Velocity vs Checkmate

So I'm very indecisive right now and wanted to make a post and see what other people think... I currently have a 2006 Velocity VR-1 with a 496 Mag HO, and I'm thinking about selling it and getting a 1996 Checkmate Convincor 283 with a 502 mag MPI. I am from New England, more specifically I go out of the mouth of the Merrimack river, which the waters out there can get rough, and was the whole reasoning behind this. Both boats are solid, and in great shape, so that's not really the issue. On the price end of things, the guy wants $33k for the Checkmate, and I could get like $38-40k for my Velocity.

Some comparisons:
The Checkmate has a deep V hull, more cabin space, full cabin enclosure (custom made snap-in, like you can walk in it, things actually really cool), has a fiberglass windscreen that comes with it in addition to the regular windshield, more cabinet space under the deck. The stereo system is stock and needs to be completely redone, and the cabin interior is really really outdated, and it has regular trim tabs
The Velocity has a pad style hull, cabins kind of cramped but more updated and has a TV (needs work to make it useful), it has K-planes, has a imco -2" lower unit and also have the original bravo 1x lower unit (needs a rebuild), overall a better looking boat and more updated, and it's powered by a 496 mag HO. The stereo system needs a new head unit and a new amplifier, and with the imco -2 drive it cavitates when trying to go on plane

Both boats are solid like I said, both boats have full Garmin systems, just having a really hard time making this decision because I see pros and cons to both. Someone help me!!!
Tjmrider is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 08:49 AM
  #2  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 3,684
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

2006 vr1 to a ‘96 something else ? I don’t get it, but i don’t get much. We all have opinions. It’s yours thst matters (in this instance )
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 08:51 AM
  #3  
rak rua's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 1,242
From: Thailand
Default

Going from a 2006 boat you know very well, that is “……overall a better looking boat and more updated….” to a 1996 model sounds brave. Even if you’re a few thousand better off, you know how quickly that gets eaten up by repairs and upgrades.

I think I’d be trying to find something newer. No hating on the Checkmate but it sounds like you may be going backwards, without much $$ compensation.

RR
rak rua is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:06 AM
  #4  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 769
From: Wichita, Kansas
Default

Is there any guarantee the Checkmate will truly handle the rougher water better? Have you tested it, etc? Hours on each boat's engine? You are essentially the same length of hull?
I just searched for '2006 Velocity VR-1' and man...that is one helluva boat you have! Rave review after rave review. Of course it is up to you as others have noted but...yeah, my opinion is it would be a backwards move.
__________________
Baja 252 Islander
bajaman is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by bajaman
Is there any guarantee the Checkmate will truly handle the rougher water better? Have you tested it, etc? Hours on each boat's engine? You are essentially the same length of hull?
I just searched for '2006 Velocity VR-1' and man...that is one helluva boat you have! Rave review after rave review. Of course it is up to you as others have noted but...yeah, my opinion is it would be a backwards move.
Have not tested the Checkmate but a ton of people say that those hulls are amazing in rough water. Checkmate has 350 hours, Velocity has like 390
Tjmrider is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:15 AM
  #6  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 146
Likes: 118
From: Atlantic City NJ
Default

I agree with all the above posts. Why would you buy a boat that’s significantly older than the one you already have ? I’m sure the Checkmate will need some work down the road that you won’t even anticipate. Sometimes it’s better to go with the devil you know than the one you don’t know. If you want another boat, move forward not backwards. Good luck !
outlaw511 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 650
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

I own a Velocity VR 1, 2005. I have been in smaller Checkmates but not a 28. However can't believe it would ride significantly, if at all, better then the VR 1. The Checkmate will be slower. If the Checkmate does not have K planes that will be an additional expense. What about external hydraulic steering. Last but definitely not least...The Velocity VR 1 is constructed without wood anywhere. IMO, A BIG plus.

How long have you had the Velocity? There is a learning curve to running a Velocity or any performance boat..

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:44 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Padraig
I own a Velocity VR 1, 2005. I have been in smaller Checkmates but not a 28. However can't believe it would ride significantly, if at all, better then the VR 1. The Checkmate will be slower. If the Checkmate does not have K planes that will be an additional expense. What about external hydraulic steering. Last but definitely not least...The Velocity VR 1 is constructed without wood anywhere. IMO, A BIG plus.

How long have you had the Velocity? There is a learning curve to running a Velocity or any performance boat..

Padraig
I know, that's kind of a thing right now is I feel I didn't give the Velocity a chance, I have only had the thing for 1 season and put like 7 hours on it. Everyone here is convincing me to keep the Velocity lol, I mean the boat is really nice, I gotta give it that
Tjmrider is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,003
Likes: 1,080
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

A good buddy of mine came from the NY Finger Lakes region and brought his `28 Checkmate to the CT coast (Long Island Sound). The Sound can kick up no problem and felt it was just not the proper hull for it, he sold it and got a PowerPlay. I never rode in it but he didn't keep it very long.
Indy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2022 | 10:23 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 175
Likes: 124
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Checkmates are great boats but I've never heard them be like a tank in rough water. Their typically a lighter weight hull so you'll get more speed on less power but I don't see that translating well in rough waters.

Honestly the biggest aspect of this Is going from a boat you know inside and out and the maintenance history in, to someone else's boat your just guessing on.

If your going to do it I would say it would need to be a significant difference to justify the headache of the switch and this just doesn't seem like enough of a change in a positive direction to merit the hassle.
CharlieWhiskey85 is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.