Notices
General Boating Discussion

Bow Thruster

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-30-2022 | 06:48 PM
  #21  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 6,418
From: Chicago
Default

seems pretty large.

ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 11-30-2022 | 09:05 PM
  #22  
tlark's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 241
From: Lee'sSummit/6mmLOTO
Default

Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
$4600 for bow only , I don`t see a reason for stern unless you can`t dock at all lol
agreed, stearn thruster on a 370ss is over-kill.

wondering how many of these are in service at LOTO ? interesting find
tlark is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 09:20 AM
  #23  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 872
From: Cedar Rapids Iowa, LOTO, Cape Coral Fl.
Default

I am really considering doing the jet thruster unit. The key will be if I can get the 2 1/2" pipe (somewhat flexible) up to the bow. I agree that the stern thrusters are probably overkill, but for not much more $$$ it might be nice, especially when selling it at some point down the road (and it would be easier/safer/better for my adult kids). I am going to have my mechanic take a look at the plumbing routing this week. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
36Tango is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 12:01 PM
  #24  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,203
Likes: 1,592
From: Worldwide
Default

Originally Posted by 36Tango
I am really considering doing the jet thruster unit. The key will be if I can get the 2 1/2" pipe (somewhat flexible) up to the bow. I agree that the stern thrusters are probably overkill, but for not much more $$$ it might be nice, especially when selling it at some point down the road (and it would be easier/safer/better for my adult kids). I am going to have my mechanic take a look at the plumbing routing this week. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
Not ideal, but you can probably flex the pipes upward, instead of rearward; all depending on where you go though the hull, even if you are forced to go through the hull at a portion that is not as perpendicular to the water surface as ideally desired. It's still going to move the boat. I'm sure they have recommend angle specs.

Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 05:39 PM
  #25  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 6,418
From: Chicago
Default

If I didn`t have all this other spending going on I`d do the jet in a second vs. drilling a hole thru the boat and all that fiberglass work.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 06:02 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
Dufour 36 installation video

I put in a 54' boat, 7' above water line and the highest 7bft wind capture .. instead of one pump handling right and left their calculator recommends one pump per side .
"Dual pump installation required to meet wind performance you've chosen"
Puts out 158.03KGF of force.
Interesting system. Did anyone notice they switched sides in the video? Hole through the hull was at the bottom of the liner hole. Can’t get the backing but on.
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 08:49 PM
  #27  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 526
Default

Borrowing the " make your garage bigger than you need so down the line when you move into a bigger boat" theory from the mancave garage threads, I second the stern thruster.

Seen a video of a key fob remote the guy used the thrusters to hold it in the dock while he hopped out and tied her off.
I'll try to dig it up.
another company makes bolt on thrusters that are streamlined (sort of in that the prop is in a tube thats roughly shaped like hull)
like those sunglasses and nose combos from the thrift store.
i'll try to dig it up.
outonsafari is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2022 | 08:59 PM
  #28  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 526
Default

https://www.yachtthruster.com/

way better looking than the exposed prop version.
i like the jet thruster idea too

Last edited by outonsafari; 12-05-2022 at 09:16 PM.
outonsafari is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2022 | 08:31 AM
  #29  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 872
From: Cedar Rapids Iowa, LOTO, Cape Coral Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by outonsafari
https://www.yachtthruster.com/

way better looking than the exposed prop version.
i like the jet thruster idea too
I have talked to them and it looks like about $7,000 for the bow, and $7,000 for the stern, plus $4-5K to install. If I went this route I would not do the stern. I am still on the fence as far as the look of it sitting externally, as it would always just look like an aftermarket bolt on. For the same money, I would have Florida Bowthrusters come up and put in a traditional thruster. Hoping to learn more about the jet thrusters over the next week.
36Tango is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-2022 | 08:45 AM
  #30  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 180
From: Indianapolis, IN/ Punta Gorda, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 36Tango
I have talked to them and it looks like about $7,000 for the bow, and $7,000 for the stern, plus $4-5K to install. If I went this route I would not do the stern. I am still on the fence as far as the look of it sitting externally, as it would always just look like an aftermarket bolt on. For the same money, I would have Florida Bowthrusters come up and put in a traditional thruster. Hoping to learn more about the jet thrusters over the next week.
There is no way I would ever bolt that ugly thing on my boat, especially over a Florida Bow Thrusters install. I had them install a bow thruster on my cabin cruiser and they did a phenomenal job.
PremierPOWER is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.