Notices
General Boating Discussion

Top Gun -Head Scratcher

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-04-2024 | 01:36 PM
  #41  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,424
Likes: 3,953
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
Guys,

One dick's opinion....

Thanks. Brad.
At least we agree on one thing..................
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 03:50 PM
  #42  
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 2,099
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by TeamSaris
I know you arent arguing, I was trying to get at what you specifically were asking.
To answer your above question, YES. It is both slower with the B3s and limited. As stated above, they are B3X's so theyll take more power than you think. Dragging two props through the water is never going to be the ticket for high speed unless you have a very high x dimension. Boost or not, if the owner cared about how fast it went it would have XRs.
Johnny,

I thought it was the XRs that were so parasitic..?

I guess I've just never thought of the thing that is actually doing to pushing to be a drag as well. Seems odd...

Thanks. Brad.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
TeamSaris's Avatar
Driver-441
20 Year Member
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,011
Likes: 1,511
From: Lake George
Default

There is no real speed (therefore, HP) loss between a bone stock bravo 1 and a bone stock XR. Whoever told you that is flat out wrong. We've replaced hundreds of bravos with XZ, 1X, XR, etc. These are boats not F1 cars. They just aren't that sensitive. XR are louder and break less. That's it.
I get what you're saying, but yes, 6-7 blades will literally have more drag than 3, even if they're doing the "pushing". Drag. Parasitic loss. Power loss. Speed loss. Call it whatever you want, they are considerably slower.
Like I said a few posts ago, less blades = more speed if you can get them to hook up. I would almost guarantee your PQ would run its absolute top speed with a modified mirage plus, but stink in the midrange. I wish they made a mirage big enough for me to try on the krypto. I know it would put me over 110.
Sportmaster and IMCO lowers are also slower until you're running over 90 or so. A standard bravo lower (if at the correct drive height) is worth 3-4mph, until it sufferers from blowout in the low 90s. The ins and outs of prop, setup, drive height, gearcase size, gearcase design, are immense. Sometimes what you think will work wont even get on plane, and sometimes two identical boats act totally different. We have a wall of props to aid in dialing boats in after repowers. We also work very closely with Brett Anderson. The coolest is when we've dialed boats in at Lake X, but that doesnt fit into all budgets.
TeamSaris is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 05:53 PM
  #44  
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 2,099
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by TeamSaris
There is no real speed (therefore, HP) loss between a bone stock bravo 1 and a bone stock XR. Whoever told you that is flat out wrong. We've replaced hundreds of bravos with XZ, 1X, XR, etc. These are boats not F1 cars. They just aren't that sensitive. XR are louder and break less. That's it.
I get what you're saying, but yes, 6-7 blades will literally have more drag than 3, even if they're doing the "pushing". Drag. Parasitic loss. Power loss. Speed loss. Call it whatever you want, they are considerably slower.
Like I said a few posts ago, less blades = more speed if you can get them to hook up. I would almost guarantee your PQ would run its absolute top speed with a modified mirage plus, but stink in the midrange. I wish they made a mirage big enough for me to try on the krypto. I know it would put me over 110.
Sportmaster and IMCO lowers are also slower until you're running over 90 or so. A standard bravo lower (if at the correct drive height) is worth 3-4mph, until it sufferers from blowout in the low 90s. The ins and outs of prop, setup, drive height, gearcase size, gearcase design, are immense. Sometimes what you think will work wont even get on plane, and sometimes two identical boats act totally different. We have a wall of props to aid in dialing boats in after repowers. We also work very closely with Brett Anderson. The coolest is when we've dialed boats in at Lake X, but that doesnt fit into all budgets.
Johnny,

Gotcha. Interesting that I’ve read that the XR robs HP probably a couple dozen times here on OSO, in comments made by members whose voices I’ve learned are worth listening to. The straight cut gears, as opposed to spiral, are the proposed culprit, and the noise (which is an indicator of drag/friction) supports that. I don’t doubt you at all. You’re one of the few members here that actually play boats for a living, so….

Back to the OP topic…. As you stated, it’s obvious the original buyer wasn’t concerned with too speed, or they would have started with bigger power and drives to match. Seems kinda like buying a Corvette and putting knobbies on it, I guess…. Sweet ride, though.

For the record, I wanted to try a Mirage Plus 29P on our PQ, but was told I’d likely never get it on plane. Have not tried it.

Thanks. Brad.

Last edited by Brad Christy; 12-04-2024 at 05:56 PM.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-2024 | 09:03 PM
  #45  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 841
Likes: 494
Default

Not the same, but.... Cobalt 263 with 496 HO whipple charged with bravo XR 3.

Claims to do 72 MPH on GPS.

https://www.cobaltchat.com/viewtopic...e+263&start=15

Here's a short vid of him doing 30 - 60 MPH.




xlint89 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2024 | 03:25 AM
  #46  
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 907
Likes: 416
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
The straight cut gears, as opposed to spiral, are the proposed culprit, and the noise (which is an indicator of drag/friction) supports that.
While noisier, straight cut gears are actually slightly more efficient.
Markus is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2024 | 05:45 AM
  #47  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
Default

Originally Posted by Markus
While noisier, straight cut gears are actually slightly more efficient.
….and their best attribute

Pits
JaayTeee is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2024 | 09:38 AM
  #48  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 358
From: Mansfield, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TeamSaris
There is no real speed (therefore, HP) loss between a bone stock bravo 1 and a bone stock XR. Whoever told you that is flat out wrong. We've replaced hundreds of bravos with XZ, 1X, XR, etc. These are boats not F1 cars. They just aren't that sensitive. XR are louder and break less. That's it.
I get what you're saying, but yes, 6-7 blades will literally have more drag than 3, even if they're doing the "pushing". Drag. Parasitic loss. Power loss. Speed loss. Call it whatever you want, they are considerably slower.
Like I said a few posts ago, less blades = more speed if you can get them to hook up. I would almost guarantee your PQ would run its absolute top speed with a modified mirage plus, but stink in the midrange. I wish they made a mirage big enough for me to try on the krypto. I know it would put me over 110.
Sportmaster and IMCO lowers are also slower until you're running over 90 or so. A standard bravo lower (if at the correct drive height) is worth 3-4mph, until it sufferers from blowout in the low 90s. The ins and outs of prop, setup, drive height, gearcase size, gearcase design, are immense. Sometimes what you think will work wont even get on plane, and sometimes two identical boats act totally different. We have a wall of props to aid in dialing boats in after repowers. We also work very closely with Brett Anderson. The coolest is when we've dialed boats in at Lake X, but that doesnt fit into all budgets.

What a great post thanks for sharing. Had suspected some of these issues as I'm working thru some handling issues of my own and confirms what I thought.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-2024 | 11:35 AM
  #49  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 790
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Madman7
When I was scouring the interwebs everyday for a 39TG, this was for sale.

It was a FLA boat, painted white, and had the thru hulls coming out under water. Terrible lol.

This was back in 2018

(Quick Search this came up)
https://www.motor1.com/news/313326/c...racing-top-gun


Absolutely loved when it looked like this. Very clean and classy.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.