Notices
General Boating Discussion

Apache vs. Cigarette

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-10-2005 | 12:37 PM
  #71  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 4
From: Boca Raton, FL
Talking Re: Apache vs. Cigarette

Originally Posted by satisfactionII
Very good thread with lots of good opinions. I love both brands but the first offshore boat I fell in love with was an Apache. I have grown to appreciate both.
The first offshore boat I fell in love with was a SeaRay!

That's how little I knew!
Edward R. Cozzi is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2007 | 10:00 PM
  #72  
Hot Duck's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,749
Likes: 91
From: Ocean City, MD
Default

Ttt
Hot Duck is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 08:22 AM
  #73  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Duck
Ttt
Two weeks ago I rode on a friends Top Gun for the afternoon. There were small/moderate seas in the 3-4 ft range with one or two 5 ft'ers. By the end of the trip my knees were hurting. For some reason the boat was a slammer.

To make sure this wasn't just a biased opinion, once we got back to the dock I went for a ride in the same waters with my 36' Apache. The ride was completely different.....on the plus side....

I was surprised how the top gun ran, I thought it would be a better ride than my boat with the extra 2 ft in length. To my dismay it was a slammer...
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 08:35 AM
  #74  
sakoutis3's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
From: Colts Neck,NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
Two weeks ago I rode on a friends Top Gun for the afternoon. There were small/moderate seas in the 3-4 ft range with one or two 5 ft'ers. By the end of the trip my knees were hurting. For some reason the boat was a slammer.

To make sure this wasn't just a biased opinion, once we got back to the dock I went for a ride in the same waters with my 36' Apache. The ride was completely different.....on the plus side....

I was surprised how the top gun ran, I thought it would be a better ride than my boat with the extra 2 ft in length. To my dismay it was a slammer...
He had it trimmed wrong.
sakoutis3 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 09:44 AM
  #75  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by sakoutis3
He had it trimmed wrong.
The 42 OL that I rode on didn't ride so good in rough water either....

On the other hand, the Gorski's flat deck is a nice riding boat....
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 10:41 AM
  #76  
Reckless32's Avatar
Rough Seas Lie Ahead
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

I've heard that both Outerlimits and Nortech had surprisingly bad rides. Guess all the magazine coverage has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Let's not forget they are all just fiberglass tubs with gauges and motors. Personally I think they all will beat the crap out of you only in different ways.

The best "rides" in my opinion would have to be the heavier deep vee models of old. Faster more fuel economic the later modesl of anything.
Reckless32 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 10:52 AM
  #77  
cfischer's Avatar
never trade luck for skil
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
Two weeks ago I rode on a friends Top Gun for the afternoon. There were small/moderate seas in the 3-4 ft range with one or two 5 ft'ers. By the end of the trip my knees were hurting. For some reason the boat was a slammer.

To make sure this wasn't just a biased opinion, once we got back to the dock I went for a ride in the same waters with my 36' Apache. The ride was completely different.....on the plus side....

I was surprised how the top gun ran, I thought it would be a better ride than my boat with the extra 2 ft in length. To my dismay it was a slammer...
Was sit a T/S or a flat bottom?

My buddy just put his 98 Top Gun in last night after adding new fuel tanks and some strength. With fresh Chief 1000s and fresh 6s that boat ran last night in 1 to 3s like no other Cigarette! He jumped up 5 inches on his prop pitch so at 4700 RPMs, we were at 87 MPH!!

I would like to say congrats to Curt on an unbelievable job!!
cfischer is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 10:57 AM
  #78  
Tom A.'s Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,288
Likes: 87
From: New Jersey
Default

Not all boats are fiberglass and this is where the problem lies. The new composite boats with the carbon fiber, kevlar and epoxy resins are much lighter and faster than the old boats. However, due to their very rigid construction (due to material charecteristics and reinforcing) their ride quality in rough water is suffering.
Which boat is best will be determined by each owner and the type of boating they do.
I agree with the analogy of the older Cigarettes and Apaches being like vintage Ferraris. They may not be the supercars being built now but will always carry the marque and be respected for what they are no matter what their age.
Tom A. is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 02:02 PM
  #79  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by offshore whore
Was sit a T/S or a flat bottom?

My buddy just put his 98 Top Gun in last night after adding new fuel tanks and some strength. With fresh Chief 1000s and fresh 6s that boat ran last night in 1 to 3s like no other Cigarette! He jumped up 5 inches on his prop pitch so at 4700 RPMs, we were at 87 MPH!!

I would like to say congrats to Curt on an unbelievable job!!
Flat bottom, late 90's model era. It was almost the same year as mine. I could use the extra couple feet to span the swells but the landings were much more forgiving on my body.

I've been in a flat deck a dozen times, late 80's model with SSM's and it ran much better.
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-2007 | 02:05 PM
  #80  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Tom A.
Not all boats are fiberglass and this is where the problem lies. The new composite boats with the carbon fiber, kevlar and epoxy resins are much lighter and faster than the old boats. However, due to their very rigid construction (due to material charecteristics and reinforcing) their ride quality in rough water is suffering.
Which boat is best will be determined by each owner and the type of boating they do.
I agree with the analogy of the older Cigarettes and Apaches being like vintage Ferraris. They may not be the supercars being built now but will always carry the marque and be respected for what they are no matter what their age.
I think that sums it up well. Back then boats were built to run offshore and now it seems like they are built to run the fastest with the least amount of power.

On both sides certain things suffer so it's up to you what you want.
Panther is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.