Notices
General Boating Discussion
View Poll Results: Yes or No
Yes
26
20.97%
No
98
79.03%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Arch - Yes no?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-12-2003 | 05:12 PM
  #21  
formula31's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Default

If you have and need radar, then yes, otherwise, always no. What's it called?
formula31 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 05:25 PM
  #22  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Too gay
GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 05:51 PM
  #23  
SUPERSTITIOUS's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 136
From: CT
Default

YYYYUUUUUCCCCCCHHHHHHHK...!!!
SUPERSTITIOUS is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 06:31 PM
  #24  
mcollinstn's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,769
Likes: 151
From: tn
Default

Looks? Not really. Even though it looks less odd on a long hull, I prefer the archless look on a go-fast.

Usefulness? Absolutely. Can run a bimini to it with a place to store it. Can attach canvas to the rear also. Lights, speakers, GPS receivers, antennas, and of course, radar. Up real high on the usefulness chart. You also got a good paint scheme for it.

I like em on cruisers, and Formula SS'es.

your boat, your call.
mcollinstn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 06:32 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 349
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Makes the boat look dated.
Gearhead99 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 06:49 PM
  #26  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

I say NO if you do not plan on putting navigation aids on it. However IF you are going to use them then I would say get it. On that boat it is SO large that it works well either way but my preference is to not have it.

Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 06:59 PM
  #27  
36spectre's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, new jersey
Default

Way too dangerous in case of an ejection!!Otto

Last edited by 36spectre; 02-12-2003 at 07:03 PM.
36spectre is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 07:12 PM
  #28  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

NO
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 07:22 PM
  #29  
timucin's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: istanbul
Default

looks better without it.
timucin is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2003 | 07:46 PM
  #30  
Charter Member #71
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: Long Island,N.Y.
Default I vote No !

Arches should be golden and in front of a fast food restaurant !
WesSmith is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.