Notices
General Boating Discussion

name for upcoming war?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-19-2003 | 08:06 PM
  #11  
VelocityMark's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, nc.
Default

Originally posted by srobak
Catmando's Catastrophe
Catmando's Call To Shut The F@ck Up
I'll second that!!
VelocityMark is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2003 | 08:10 PM
  #12  
Erie Desire's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Lake Erie,MI
Default

Operation.......



SADDAMIZE
Erie Desire is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2003 | 08:21 PM
  #13  
Pantera1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Winnipesaukee
Default OK

316
Pantera1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2003 | 09:50 PM
  #14  
AKA "BAZOOKA JOE"
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
From: NEW JERSEY
Default

there all good
bojoe2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2003 | 11:43 PM
  #15  
Erie Desire's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Lake Erie,MI
Default

Did I mispell Saddamy?


Now it's the beer talking
Erie Desire is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2003 | 12:04 AM
  #16  
puder's Avatar
speel chekk this fokker!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 1
From: Locust Valley, New York
Default

Operation "Set a very bad prescident for countries like North Korea, India and Pakistan. So it now make sit OK for them to make pre-emptive strikes on thier precieved enemies tha may or may not have weapons of mass destruction, which india and pakistan BOTH have and are WILLING to use"

or is that too long and not catchey enough for TV?

That being said its begun and diplomacy failed. Bomb them back to the stone age. And lets see if we can this damn stock market stabailized. At least all teh uncertainty is over and teh upcommgin war taht has been "priced into" everythign for teh passed few months will eb over and we can start making a move to the upside and i can cash in on some purchases.
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
puder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2003 | 12:10 AM
  #17  
puder's Avatar
speel chekk this fokker!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 1
From: Locust Valley, New York
Default

lemme just clairifed my last statement before I get jumped on. Sadam Hussein is a madman and needs to be "taken care of" I just think perhaps a "secret assasination" might be better than a full frontal assaul tha make us loosk like the bad guys beating on eth oppressed iraq's (what a PR job they pulled, insane, meglomaniac, emperialistic madman turned into the empoverished defenseless opressed nation of sufferers)

Once agian to clarify I have no problem with the OBJECTIVES in this war i jsut hitnk the ware isn't needed to achieve them. But its the path we chose so we better hope those checmical biological weapons turn up when its all over.
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
puder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2003 | 01:02 AM
  #18  
at100plus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Default Pardon me

This is not a "pre emptive strike"

It is a resumption of war, and we have full authority under international law to do so.

Gulf War I Treaty signed by Saddam Hussein in 1991 said that Saddam must give full cooperation to UN and eliminate his arsenal of certain weapons.

HE HAS DONE NEITHER.

Under international law, if you violate a war treaty, war resumes to defend the principles of that treaty.

THIS IS A R E S U M P T I O N OF the 1991 Gulf War


Time to finish the job.

Oh yea, lets not forget 17 UN resolutions and 12 years of trying to figure out how to make Saddam comply without resuming war. The 17th resolution was a unanimous vote (France included) of the UN Security council to use military force if Saddam did not comply.
at100plus is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2003 | 08:04 AM
  #19  
X-Rated30's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 1
From: Monroe, LA
Default

I like "Gulf War - Version 1.2".

BTW - I am a lifelong Republican and I grew up in Texas. Nevertheless, I think Bush has f---ed this thing up to no end. But while I disagree with how they ended up in this war, I unquestioningly support out troops, and can't wait to see them kick some A$$.

I'm with Puder -- let's just hope it helps the economy (where the President should have declared war to begin with). uppy:
X-Rated30 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2003 | 08:16 AM
  #20  
Playn's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 1
From: BRENTWOOD, TN
Default Re: Pardon me

Originally posted by at100plus
This is not a "pre emptive strike"

It is a resumption of war, and we have full authority under international law to do so.

Gulf War I Treaty signed by Saddam Hussein in 1991 said that Saddam must give full cooperation to UN and eliminate his arsenal of certain weapons.

HE HAS DONE NEITHER.

Under international law, if you violate a war treaty, war resumes to defend the principles of that treaty.

THIS IS A R E S U M P T I O N OF the 1991 Gulf War


Time to finish the job.

Oh yea, lets not forget 17 UN resolutions and 12 years of trying to figure out how to make Saddam comply without resuming war. The 17th resolution was a unanimous vote (France included) of the UN Security council to use military force if Saddam did not comply.
Absolutely 100% correct!
Playn is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boatfreak
Technical Issues
0
08-21-2008 10:18 PM
trimman
Great Lakes and Canada
0
08-14-2005 08:41 PM
fountain525sc
General Boating Discussion
8
02-03-2003 08:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.